Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-26-2015, 02:40 PM
 
Location: Salem, OR
15,572 posts, read 40,409,288 times
Reputation: 17473

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokerHarry View Post
If price per square foot is so meaningless & irrelevant...then maybe you can explain why appraisers go thru the effort of ascertaining the accurate dimensions of the dwelling before they determine the market value of the property?

I have never met an appraiser yet who didn't consider price per square foot somewhere in their report.
Um, that is because they use the required Fannie Mae Uniform Residential Appraisal Report (Form 1004) which has it as a line item. The form was created by Fannie Mae, not appraisers. It is a lender-driven form. So that is why they put it on there. Putting it on there because Fannie Mae requires it, and considering it in their calculations are two different things.

They measure the house because people do additions all the time without permits. They measure the house because the floor plan the builder submits to the city/county isn't what actually gets built sometimes. They measure the house because one of the adjustments they do is for square footage and they need to confirm the square footage to confirm the needed adjustment.

It is meaningless and irrelevant for anything other than ballpark/computer algorithms. We can disagree on the value of that calculation, but if you are going to be so pro using it, at least know why appraisers note it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-27-2015, 06:36 AM
 
577 posts, read 662,642 times
Reputation: 1605
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokerHarry View Post
If price per square foot is so meaningless & irrelevant...then maybe you can explain why appraisers go thru the effort of ascertaining the accurate dimensions of the dwelling before they determine the market value of the property?

I have never met an appraiser yet who didn't consider price per square foot somewhere in their report.
Appraisals include an adjustment for square footage. However, it is typically the last adjustment that is made, and it is not derived by dividing the purchase price by the size of the dwelling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2015, 09:56 AM
 
104 posts, read 98,248 times
Reputation: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokerHarry View Post
To the contrary, I believe price per square foot is extremely meaningful, & anyone who doesn't consider or know their $psf is flying blind.

...by calculating the $psf, it allows the interested party the ability to now ascertain the additional cost, plus or minus, of those upgrades or amenities, or lack thereof.

Respectfully, I will never agree with any agent who says price per sq ft is meaningless.
I totally agree with this statement. I think price per sq ft should be used to establish a base price then add or subtract a $ amount based on upgrades, location, layout etc from another comp. One thing that really annoys me is how some realtors will pad sq footage; a good example - I am looking at a townhouse to purchase. Listing agent lists sq ft as 2000. However it turns out they included the attached garage in that calculation.

Most people do look at sq ft, realtors know this and some will purposely pad the sq footage just to get buyers in the door. Luckily the townhouse is a PUD and the city assessors site lists the sq footage of the building as well as the size of the owned plot of land underneath. Turns out the living area is actually 1700 sq ft.

Padding sq ft is bad for comps. Another townhouse down the street which does NOT have an attached garage is listed at 2000 sq ft. The true living space is approx 2000 sq ft - so more living space than the townhouse I mentioned above. When my realtor ran a CMA, the comp down the street was included, yet he never mentioned to me that garage was not included in sq ft calculation. Luckily I'm familiar with how this all works and was able to determine a fair price for the townhouse I'm looking at. The average buyer would probably not be aware of this.

I also found that some realtors are simply lazy and will copy inaccurate info from a previously sold comp of an identical unit to use for a new listing. Go in and take measurements of the room sizes before you list the property! I say BS to the statement "price per sq ft is meaningless".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-27-2015, 10:04 AM
 
104 posts, read 98,248 times
Reputation: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by RestArea View Post
A lot of listing agents are absolutely shameless in my opinion.
Yes, totally agree!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top