Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-25-2016, 11:23 AM
 
1,399 posts, read 1,797,222 times
Reputation: 3256

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA2SGF View Post
It's a California thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mello-Roos

I wouldn't want that either but we don't have it here.

I don't have an HOA, but I pay an average of $120/month for lawn care plus $42/month gym fees. So on the surface, if an HOA had a gym and took care of the lawn, $160/month sounds OK. But I guess I'm a cranky old lady because I prefer handling these things myself. I like having the choice of who to hire for the yard, and what gym to go to. So, I prefer no HOA and they aren't very common down here anyway.
it is ironic isn't it......the public speaks, says no more astounding property tax increases and the legislature "creates" a new source of funding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-25-2016, 06:43 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, AK
7,448 posts, read 7,576,216 times
Reputation: 16456
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA2SGF View Post
It's a California thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mello-Roos

I wouldn't want that either but we don't have it here.

I don't have an HOA, but I pay an average of $120/month for lawn care plus $42/month gym fees. So on the surface, if an HOA had a gym and took care of the lawn, $160/month sounds OK. But I guess I'm a cranky old lady because I prefer handling these things myself. I like having the choice of who to hire for the yard, and what gym to go to. So, I prefer no HOA and they aren't very common down here anyway.

Sounds like a way around Prop 13.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2016, 09:32 PM
 
741 posts, read 589,858 times
Reputation: 3471
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlaskaErik View Post
Sounds like a way around Prop 13.
Yep, that's exactly what it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 04:16 PM
 
Location: Southwest Washington State
30,585 posts, read 25,121,941 times
Reputation: 50801
For us in 2012 these were deal breakers:

two story
steep lot or steep road leading to house
too close to noisy commercial areas or major roads
tight kitchen
a house that needs major upgrades in the kitchen or bath
poorly maintained home
inefficient floor plan
family room too small for our furniture

These things were all considerations for various homes we looked at.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 08:21 PM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,486,164 times
Reputation: 35437
Quote:
Originally Posted by FairMindedLL View Post
There's definitely a story (or several) here. Wait, let me get the popcorn......Ok, I'm ready. Can you share? We're house hunting right now and I'd love to hear about the emotional sellers you've had the misfortune to stumble across. 😁


Lol.
Here is one about 3 months ago. Husband and wife divorcing. (Found out later)
560 asking price.
I offered
550k 20 down and 30 day escrow. Good job no issues closing. I pay my closing/costs they pay theirs (I though I was reasonable) house needed some work but it fit our wants.
They came back with
559,500
60 day escrow
Release of property 8 days after escrow close with no out of pocket cost on their side (they wanted enough time to move. I guess 60 day escrow wasn't enough)
AND
escrow timeline to start after they find a house to buy. I inquired about the expected timeline of finding a house. they came back wanted a open ended timeline as they each had to secure independent housing
Totally crazy. I just thanked them for their time. (They came back two times offering same terms but took $500 off the price each time. I finally told my agent to ignore any more contact as I will not be purchasing)


Went to see this one house week ago. Made appointment got there on time. Was looking outside from the driveway. Homeowner pulled up in a really mad aggressive way. Gave me a look. But I dont GAF and really don't intimidate easily. So I walked in the house. House was nice but his body language simply said i'm not selling. Started talking to him. Ends up the house was his dream home. Wife wanted to move to Hawaii or some far away land.
And this guy was just mad and standoffish. I didn't even bother bidding.

first house is still for sale. The second was pulled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2016, 08:41 PM
 
Location: here
24,873 posts, read 36,146,706 times
Reputation: 32726
Some things that are listed here as deal breakers are things that would prevent me from ever looking at a house in the first place, like location. The first think I can think of that would be a deal breaker is a busy street, front or back, a tiny yard, or a garage that's too small.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 08:19 PM
 
741 posts, read 589,858 times
Reputation: 3471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electrician4you View Post
Lol.
Here is one about 3 months ago. Husband and wife divorcing. (Found out later)
560 asking price.
I offered
550k 20 down and 30 day escrow. Good job no issues closing. I pay my closing/costs they pay theirs (I though I was reasonable) house needed some work but it fit our wants.
They came back with
559,500
60 day escrow
Release of property 8 days after escrow close with no out of pocket cost on their side (they wanted enough time to move. I guess 60 day escrow wasn't enough)
AND
escrow timeline to start after they find a house to buy. I inquired about the expected timeline of finding a house. they came back wanted a open ended timeline as they each had to secure independent housing
Totally crazy. I just thanked them for their time. (They came back two times offering same terms but took $500 off the price each time. I finally told my agent to ignore any more contact as I will not be purchasing)


Went to see this one house week ago. Made appointment got there on time. Was looking outside from the driveway. Homeowner pulled up in a really mad aggressive way. Gave me a look. But I dont GAF and really don't intimidate easily. So I walked in the house. House was nice but his body language simply said i'm not selling. Started talking to him. Ends up the house was his dream home. Wife wanted to move to Hawaii or some far away land.
And this guy was just mad and standoffish. I didn't even bother bidding.

first house is still for sale. The second was pulled.
Wow, thank you--I needed that. Very entertaining! I think I need to add emotional sellers to my list of deal breakers.

I have some house hunting stories to share, but I'm going to start a new thread. This could be really therapeutic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Midwest transplant
2,050 posts, read 5,939,491 times
Reputation: 1623
My deal breakers were and I wouldn't even go look at the home/houses:

no swimming pool
must have an attached garage
basement access without having to walk through the house, I wanted to come in the house and be able to access the basement from garage door entrance
1st floor laundry
gas heat and central air conditioning
NO septic system
NO well water
NO corner lot
must have sidewalks
NO ridiculous HOA's~

We ended up with a decent HOA~not terribly restrictive and maintains green space, entrances and cul de sac landscaping, pays for street lights, keeps people from parking recreational vehicles on their property. When there is a good board we have a proactive voice with the township/municipality in which we reside. Dues are less than $100 year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2016, 12:08 PM
jw2
 
2,028 posts, read 3,264,087 times
Reputation: 3387
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA2SGF View Post
It's a California thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mello-Roos

I wouldn't want that either but we don't have it here.

I don't have an HOA, but I pay an average of $120/month for lawn care plus $42/month gym fees. So on the surface, if an HOA had a gym and took care of the lawn, $160/month sounds OK. But I guess I'm a cranky old lady because I prefer handling these things myself. I like having the choice of who to hire for the yard, and what gym to go to. So, I prefer no HOA and they aren't very common down here anyway.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cargoman View Post
it is ironic isn't it......the public speaks, says no more astounding property tax increases and the legislature "creates" a new source of funding.

But the proper people are paying for it now.

In a nutshell, to summarize this part of it, if a new development came to town, frequently it placed a burden on the existing infrastructure with new or expanded roads, libraries, schools, etc. Previously, they just raised the property taxes in the whole town to pay for it. Part of the argument that lead to the passage of Prop 13 was the existing homeowners should not have to pay for the new schools to be built in the new neighborhood that their kids were not even going to attend, or roads that lead to the new development. etc.

Mello Roos basically says the new developer has to pay for any infrastructure that the development needs. Sometimes they take out bonds, maybe 10 or 20 year duration, and stick the new homeowner with them. At least the homeowner knows he is paying the bond when he is buying the house. Sometimes the developer just pays them and adds the cost to the price of the house. But existing homeowners are not stuck paying for something that a new neighborhood requires.

Sometimes, they are not that big a deal. It might show up as a $600 yearly expense but there may only be a year or two left on the bond. That is peanuts on a $800,000 house. It needs to be evaluated when buying, not avoided at all costs.

Last edited by jw2; 03-30-2016 at 12:16 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2016, 12:25 PM
 
741 posts, read 589,858 times
Reputation: 3471
Quote:
Originally Posted by jw2 View Post
Sometimes, they are not that big a deal. It might show up as a $600 yearly expense but there may only be a year or two left on the bond. That is peanuts on a $800,000 house. It needs to be evaluated when buying, not avoided at all costs.
If mello roos taxes were that cheap around here, it wouldn't be a deterrent to own a home burdened with them. "Cheap" is $180 per month. That's what it would have cost us if we purchased this place at $450K that we're currently renting. But some of the new developments have mello roos as high as $900 per month. The bond is supposed to be paid off in theory, but in practice rarely is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top