Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-23-2008, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Gilbert - Val Vista Lakes
6,069 posts, read 14,731,435 times
Reputation: 3876

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jennybgoode View Post
I have no buyer's agent (if I did I would seek advice from them of course) I am more trying to figure out what's up with the seller's behavior (returning same counter which is 10% above appraised value) rather than "cut out the agent" so to speak. The effort exerted by the listing agent consisted of showing me the property (once, in the dark) and receiving two purchase offer faxes from me. I wrote them, she presumably called up the seller and told him about them. It's possible she sent a couple of faxes herself. The amount I would be willing to pay remains unchanged regardless of commissions so the extra money is all in the seller's pocket. There is no second agent. If I had a personal agreement with anyone, I would honor it. I found the listing agent very unhelpful, but I have no agreement with her, she's the listing agent. I guess I have to wait and see if the seller is actually motivated to sell.
It was incorrectly assumed that you had a buyers agent, therefore, the responses were geared to that.

This is all strange because if I were the listing agent, and I'm in Arizona, and you came to me with an offer, and you were representing yourself, then I would need to have you sign an Agency Disclosure form that notifies you that I am the Agent of the Seller and do not represent you. I don't know about your state.

It needs to be clear who the agent is representing, and not representing, no matter who actually pens the offer. Otherwise there could be an implied dual agency situation that arises.

When the seller countered with the same price as before, they were telling you that you need to come up more to get into their ball park before they would make more concessions. Once you get in their ball park then you could consider making small concessions each time and giving the sellers 48 hours instead of 24 to think about it. In the meantime you can be looking at other properties.

There are many ways to structure negotiations that don't amount to higher price offers. That's where a good buyers representative can be worth their weight in gold for you.

So to answer your question with the new information:

Since you state that you were not represented by the sellers agent, then you can go directly to the seller since they are now fsbo.

The other thing you may do is to wait for 180 days, assuming that is the contract extension time, and then contact the seller directly. The reason they went fsbo is the home didn't sell with the agent, and without the marketing it most likely won't sell now, and the price will have to come down in 6 months.

If you buy the home within the period of time in the contract extension period, the sellers will still have to pay the realtors commission. So they will not save any money by not using their realtor.

Since you were going on your own, then I assume you have the knowledge to complete a transaction. However, the fsbo may not, and that can cause some problems. That's just to give you a heads up.

If it were me, I would go back to the realtor, since they're going to have to pay the commission anyway. At least you'll know that there is someone on that other side that knows what they're doing in the transaction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-23-2008, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
10,907 posts, read 21,866,487 times
Reputation: 10539
Whoa there Capt. Bill.

The agent may be protected for a predetermined amount of time after the listing to anyone they showed property to. It won't affect the buyer either way, but the seller could have to pay commission. Honestly, at this point I think the buyer should call the agent back first and if they aren't helpful then go from there.

Buyer, I also suggest representation on the next one if this one doesn't work. Find an agent you like and hire them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2008, 10:47 AM
 
Location: NW Las Vegas - Lone Mountain
15,756 posts, read 38,076,041 times
Reputation: 2661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon Hoffman View Post
Whoa there Capt. Bill.

The agent may be protected for a predetermined amount of time after the listing to anyone they showed property to. It won't affect the buyer either way, but the seller could have to pay commission. Honestly, at this point I think the buyer should call the agent back first and if they aren't helpful then go from there.

Buyer, I also suggest representation on the next one if this one doesn't work. Find an agent you like and hire them.
Yup...note as laid out the Listing Agent will end up with the commission that would have been paid to a buyers agent.
-
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2008, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Gilbert - Val Vista Lakes
6,069 posts, read 14,731,435 times
Reputation: 3876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon Hoffman View Post
Whoa there Capt. Bill.

The agent may be protected for a predetermined amount of time after the listing to anyone they showed property to. It won't affect the buyer either way, but the seller could have to pay commission. Honestly, at this point I think the buyer should call the agent back first and if they aren't helpful then go from there.

Buyer, I also suggest representation on the next one if this one doesn't work. Find an agent you like and hire them.
You're right, and I thought I said the sellers agent would be due a commission.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2008, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Palm Coast, Fl
2,249 posts, read 8,874,703 times
Reputation: 1009
Ok, so then you are in the clear. It's the seller that has to be careful and is on the hook for a fee to the listing agent for a certain period of time if they sell to someone who has seen the house previously. It looks to me as if the listing ended, the seller could do the deal if the agent was out of the way but they're on the hook. The listing agent isn't going to do anything because the seller won't resign. You'll have to wait it out or the seller would have to renegotiate the fee he would pay to the past agent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top