Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-29-2017, 05:14 PM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,283 posts, read 77,104,102 times
Reputation: 45647

Advertisements

"Insult" is a choice driven by emotion. No more. No less.
Unless the buyer says something like, "Yer ugly and yer Ma dresses you funny," it is just a business discussion regarding an asset.

I have seen sellers choose to lose many thousands of dollars by choosing to be "insulted" rather than to be "businesslike."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-29-2017, 05:18 PM
 
8,574 posts, read 12,408,664 times
Reputation: 16528
Quote:
Originally Posted by marid4061 View Post
I think if they were serious buyers they would not have put in such a low offer with a contingency. I think they are testing the waters. This far out I might have taken the contingency offer but countered around $378,000. And add the kick out clause. This is your first nibble, I would hang in there and wait out other offers.
I wouldn't automatically assume that someone who puts in a low offer isn't a serious buyer. They may just be thinking that they'll throw out a low offer to see if there is a nibble, figuring that they can always go up. Of course, sometimes that may offend some people, leading to no further negotiations. Sometimes people who choose to be less emotional can reach a meeting of the minds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2017, 05:21 PM
 
1,078 posts, read 938,011 times
Reputation: 2877
Quote:
Originally Posted by marid4061 View Post
I think if they were serious buyers they would not have put in such a low offer with a contingency. I think they are testing the waters. This far out I might have taken the contingency offer but countered around $378,000. And add the kick out clause. This is your first nibble, I would hang in there and wait out other offers.
That's kind of where I was going with his too. Unless the house is priced competitively already, accepting a contingency can be a good way to get a higher offer. I know I haggle harder when I'm paying almost all cash or have nothing to lose than when I absolutely want the house and need to sell mine. I'd accept a lower offer with no contingency or a higher offer with one, except in cases where the house has been priced very, very aggressively.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2017, 05:22 PM
 
1,491 posts, read 379,314 times
Reputation: 774
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmichigan View Post
I wouldn't automatically assume that someone who puts in a low offer isn't a serious buyer. They may just be thinking that they'll throw out a low offer to see if there is a nibble, figuring that they can always go up. Of course, sometimes that may offend some people, leading to no further negotiations. Sometimes a meeting of the minds can eventually occur.

I agree with you. It doesn't mean they aren't serious, and also, people shouldn't get insulted over an offer. If you don't like it, move along to the next buyer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2017, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Florida
3,133 posts, read 2,257,513 times
Reputation: 9171
I would have countered similar to what you did. I wouldn't have been insulted by their offer though. People offer what they do for a lot of reasons,not all of which are because they wish to lowball you. It's business after all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2017, 05:53 PM
 
Location: Kansas City North
6,816 posts, read 11,542,919 times
Reputation: 17146
We've heard nothing further.....but didn't expect to since we rejected the contingency. Maybe if they put their house on the market AND get a quick offer on it they'll come back and we can really play ball if they are serious about it. Or maybe someone else will come along with something.

Kick out clauses are standard around here (they had one in their offer) but our realtor said it may tend to reduce showings since some people don't feel like messing with such a house. In a couple weeks we will definitely entertain them.

As far as our financial details, we'll be withdrawing less than 10% of our investments and using our equity from the current house to pay for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2017, 05:56 PM
 
2,509 posts, read 2,496,877 times
Reputation: 4692
Not about the OP, but I think getting insulted by lowballs is silly. An offer is an offer. Just counter back at full price
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2017, 05:57 PM
 
1,491 posts, read 379,314 times
Reputation: 774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Okey Dokie View Post
We've heard nothing further.....but didn't expect to since we rejected the contingency. Maybe if they put their house on the market AND get a quick offer on it they'll come back and we can really play ball if they are serious about it. Or maybe someone else will come along with something.

Kick out clauses are standard around here (they had one in their offer) but our realtor said it may tend to reduce showings since some people don't feel like messing with such a house. In a couple weeks we will definitely entertain them.

As far as our financial details, we'll be withdrawing less than 10% of our investments and using our equity from the current house to pay for it.

Good luck to you. I hope everything works out for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2017, 05:59 PM
 
1,491 posts, read 379,314 times
Reputation: 774
Quote:
Originally Posted by bookspage View Post
Not about the OP, but I think getting insulted by lowballs is silly. An offer is an offer. Just counter back at full price

Exactly!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2017, 06:05 PM
 
Location: 89052 & 75206
8,147 posts, read 8,348,424 times
Reputation: 20081
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
Ding Ding Ding


Have you discussed this with your CPA and/or financial advisor?

If you're still working with a decent income... having a mortgage can make good sense.
Even if going into retirement it can be a great cash management tool.

How big the mortgage is relative to your total net worth is the issue.
iow.. borrow but do so on a smaller property.
This has nothing to do with the OP question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top