Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-26-2008, 12:00 PM
 
546 posts, read 2,204,262 times
Reputation: 160

Advertisements

I’m trying to get a feeling from others, do you personally prefer a 4 year old condo unit, with very little land, a HOA due OR a VERY old home with a larger land, but will have more problems with the old house down the road? Under the condition that the price is about the same, around the same area, same quality schools..thanks.

just examples here...
Example of newer condo:
2264 E. 4500 S. For Sale, Holladay UT Real Estate
OLD house example:
Utah Real Estate - Your One Stop Source for Searching Real Estate in Utah
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-26-2008, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Marion, IN
8,189 posts, read 31,235,578 times
Reputation: 7344
I would choose the house every time. Problems down the road will happen with the condo as well as the house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2008, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Central Texas
20,958 posts, read 45,404,950 times
Reputation: 24745
I would choose the house. But that's my personal taste - I actually live in an early 1900's house on 55 acres. And our house in town is a 1950's house on a larger lot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2008, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Knoxville
4,704 posts, read 25,301,161 times
Reputation: 6131
Has a lot to do with what you like or don't like.

If you don't like yard work - then the condo is for you.
If you don't mind yard work, but don't own stuff to take care of it - added expense. Plus the added expense of taking care of the yard, etc.
Condo may have little or no outside maintenance for you to be responsible for - saving in time and money.
House may or may not have a HOA. Some sub-divisions have HOA. This also depends on how you feel about rules and regs.
With either the condo or the house, there is always the expenses involved with upkeep and equipment wearing out. Condo may not have a roof expense, but some do. For instance, the water heater and heating system will wear out in both places.
If you have or want to have animals (dogs), then a house is usually a better choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2008, 01:51 PM
 
Location: East Tennessee
3,928 posts, read 11,601,624 times
Reputation: 5260
I would choose based on the location and proximity to necessary services.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2008, 02:31 PM
 
3,191 posts, read 9,183,768 times
Reputation: 2203
if you can't stand yard work and don't mind very close neighbors...the condo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2008, 02:34 PM
 
546 posts, read 2,204,262 times
Reputation: 160
I would pick the house over the condo, but my issue was that the condo is super old like built in the 1930-50s, the condo was built in yr 2004. so, in this siutation which one would you prefer? the house is about 50 something yrs older than the condo...thanks for all of your input.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2008, 02:47 PM
 
Location: East Tennessee
3,928 posts, read 11,601,624 times
Reputation: 5260
Would the taxes and insurance make a difference? In Florida, a home built prior to 2004 would would have higher homeowner insurance premiums. I think the newer construction would have better energy efficiency as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2008, 03:16 PM
 
546 posts, read 2,204,262 times
Reputation: 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by TampaKaren View Post
Would the taxes and insurance make a difference? In Florida, a home built prior to 2004 would would have higher homeowner insurance premiums. I think the newer construction would have better energy efficiency as well.
never thought of that..will check it out..that's a very good point. thanks...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top