Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2008, 07:54 PM
 
1,305 posts, read 2,755,376 times
Reputation: 238

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gbone View Post
If you believe that high radon levels in your house can lead to serious health problems(and I do) you need to get a radon test. Not having a radon test done on a house you are purchasing(whether old or new) is like having unprotected sex with someone you just met. Things may be okay, but if not it may turn deadly. Unless you are in a part of the country where radon is not an issue at all(and I don't know where that is) then I think getting a radon test is a slam dunk.
It's local. I lived in Phoenix, AZ and never heard about radon tests. Now I live in Seattle, WA and also have never heard about people getting radon tests.

Back in my home state of Montana, people don't talk much about it, thought it is more common there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-05-2008, 04:39 AM
 
192 posts, read 437,945 times
Reputation: 58
Default radon seems like necessary then

how about termite testing for a new construction?
cost is not really an issue, but do not want to waste time doing something not meaningful
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2008, 07:00 AM
 
Location: Stewartsville, NJ
7,577 posts, read 22,607,487 times
Reputation: 1260
Quote:
Originally Posted by duhrambull View Post
how about termite testing for a new construction?
cost is not really an issue, but do not want to waste time doing something not meaningful
I'm also buying new const. - I hired a Structural Engineer to do my inspection. Little things like termites, radon, etc. aren't going to be huge issues - my concern will be "quality" of the construction and who better to pick up on bad construction practices than a Structural engineer? And his fees aren't terrible - $350.00 plus $75.00 for the radon. And he emails the results of his inspection the same day!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2008, 08:28 PM
 
Location: Knoxville
4,704 posts, read 25,301,161 times
Reputation: 6131
Since NJ is a licensed State, I hope your inspector holds a NJ home inspector license.

You can always go to the EPA radon web site and look up potential radon exposure levels in any State.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2008, 09:03 PM
 
1,305 posts, read 2,755,376 times
Reputation: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barking Spider View Post
Since NJ is a licensed State, I hope your inspector holds a NJ home inspector license.

You can always go to the EPA radon web site and look up potential radon exposure levels in any State.
Professional (Structural is one type of professional) engineers generally don't need a home inspection license in order to make a structural assessment of a home. Assuming they are competent, most states consider that to be acting within the scope of the engineering license they have.

Of course, structural engineers can't do a termite inspection and call that part of their engineering evaluation. But if termite damage has occured, it'd be appropriate for the engineer to make the determination if the house is still structurally sound.

As comparison, the licensed home inspector can't make a structural determination on whether the house is sound. The home inspector can not if some was done improperly but can't make a determination on what the structural implications are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2008, 05:27 AM
 
Location: Stewartsville, NJ
7,577 posts, read 22,607,487 times
Reputation: 1260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barking Spider View Post
Since NJ is a licensed State, I hope your inspector holds a NJ home inspector license.

You can always go to the EPA radon web site and look up potential radon exposure levels in any State.
They carry a radon and termite lic. no. - full service company.

Home Inspections NY | Home Inspections New Jersey (http://www.alphahomeinspectors.net/index.html - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2008, 09:03 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
2,510 posts, read 3,976,796 times
Reputation: 621
Default New Jersey Testing

I am a New Jersey DEP licensed radon specialist.....I do testing and mitigation. It is not a requirement that passive radon systems be installed in all new construction.....only new houses in Tier 1 areas....those are zip codes where more than 25% of all tests reported to the DEP have elevated levels of radon. Additionally........most builders cannot provide "closed house" conditions for testing as they constantly have sub-contractors running in an out of the house leaving doors and windows open....arrange for a 30 day period after settlement to do your test......reputable builders will allow for this.

Mike Huber
DEP License# MIS10433
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2008, 06:54 AM
 
Location: Knoxville
4,704 posts, read 25,301,161 times
Reputation: 6131
Default Clarification about home inspector license

bigtrees - You are correct that a PE does not need a home inspection license to do a "structural inspection". However, a "home inspection" for a real estate transaction does require a Home Inspectors license, and substitutes are not accepted (in States that I know of).

A home inspection is usually well defined by the State, as are the qualifications of the license holder. Can't speak for NJ, but in TN at least, they do not accept ANY variations of the basic license requirements.

NJ used to have one of the best home inspection licensing bills around, but it was amended a while back, and watered down a bunch. I am not sure what all they allow now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2008, 07:00 AM
 
9,848 posts, read 30,286,677 times
Reputation: 10516
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtrees View Post
However, if your builder won't pay for corrective action, I'm not sure the radon test is worthwhile.
I don't understand this response. So if your builder will not agree to pay for mitigation you should just ignore the possibility that you might have a radon problem in the first place? That doesn't make any sense to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2008, 07:07 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
20,958 posts, read 45,404,950 times
Reputation: 24745
You can find the EPA map of radon zones for your area here. This link is to Texas; just replace "texas" with the name of your state in the url and it will take you to the zone map for your state. In most of Texas, radon is not an issue and we don't get inspections for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top