Drunk so not innocent (call, looking, different, serious)

[JSizzle225]

AZ State Law 13-1401 5b

5. "Without consent" includes any of the following:
(a) The victim is coerced by the immediate use or threatened use of force against a person or property.
(b) The victim is incapable of consent by reason of mental disorder, mental defect, drugs, alcohol, sleep or any other similar impairment of cognition and such condition is known or should have reasonably been known to the defendant. For purposes of this subdivision, "mental defect" means the victim is unable to comprehend the distinctively sexual nature of the conduct or is incapable of understanding or exercising the right to refuse to engage in the conduct with another.
(c) The victim is intentionally deceived as to the nature of the act.
(d) The victim is intentionally deceived to erroneously believe that the person is the victim's spouse.



The term REASON, is up for debate. You could put the guy on trial, in this state though.


Arizona Revised Statutes

(I don't really know how much it applies to this case...I was arguing when Mr. Roethlisberger said, "I'M DRUNK = EFF ME")

[2mares]

Originally Posted by seeniorita

Please tell me how a thief stealing a wallet is the same as a girl having drunk sex with a dude?

You do know what a thief is? Someone who takes without permission, steals.

The OP LET him have sex with her. Drunk or not, it was by choice.

The commonality is personal responsibility and drunkeness. In effect your goods are taken without permission when one is in such a druken state as to not be able to make a clear decision regarding sex same as your wallet lifted due to being in a state of drunkeness that you cant control your money.

[misswee]

Originally Posted by Mikala43

And earlier this week you were crying because you thought he was sooo amazing.

If you were my RL friend I would give you a hug, than wap you upside the head really hard.

You would obviuosly make a good friend then... I am usually the wapper, lol.....

[texas_dave11]

Originally Posted by JSizzle225

AZ State Law 13-1401 5b

5. "Without consent" includes any of the following:
(a) The victim is coerced by the immediate use or threatened use of force against a person or property.
(b) The victim is incapable of consent by reason of mental disorder, mental defect, drugs, alcohol, sleep or any other similar impairment of cognition and such condition is known or should have reasonably been known to the defendant. For purposes of this subdivision, "mental defect" means the victim is unable to comprehend the distinctively sexual nature of the conduct or is incapable of understanding or exercising the right to refuse to engage in the conduct with another.
(c) The victim is intentionally deceived as to the nature of the act.
(d) The victim is intentionally deceived to erroneously believe that the person is the victim's spouse.



The term REASON, is up for debate. You could put the guy on trial, in this state though.


Arizona Revised Statutes

(I don't really know how much it applies to this case...I was arguing when Mr. Roethlisberger said, "I'M DRUNK = EFF ME")

Sounds like if both partners are intoxicated, it would seem quite unconstitutional to rule in favor of the female.

[breeze823]

well it's like this: you went into drinking already knowing these things about yourself so why is it his responsibility to make sure you didn't drink too much? I'm an adult and know what my alcohol tolerance is and know when I should maybe stop drinking....just sayin

[JSizzle225]

Originally Posted by texas_dave11

Sounds like if both partners are intoxicated, it would seem quite unconstitutional to rule in favor of the female.

I'm simply too awesome to be talking to you. Goodbye.

[seeniorita]

Originally Posted by JSizzle225

By the way, my original argument was with Ben Roethlisberger, up there. He said "I'M DRUNK = F Me."

Originally Posted by JSizzle225

AZ State Law 13-1401 5b

5. "Without consent" includes any of the following:
(a) The victim is coerced by the immediate use or threatened use of force against a person or property.
(b) The victim is incapable of consent by reason of mental disorder, mental defect, drugs, alcohol, sleep or any other similar impairment of cognition and such condition is known or should have reasonably been known to the defendant. For purposes of this subdivision, "mental defect" means the victim is unable to comprehend the distinctively sexual nature of the conduct or is incapable of understanding or exercising the right to refuse to engage in the conduct with another.
(c) The victim is intentionally deceived as to the nature of the act.
(d) The victim is intentionally deceived to erroneously believe that the person is the victim's spouse.



The term REASON, is up for debate. You could put the guy on trial, in this state though.


Arizona Revised Statutes

(I don't really know how much it applies to this case...I was arguing when Mr. Roethlisberger said, "I'M DRUNK = EFF ME")

Exactly. We only know her side of the story. Alot of innocent men are sitting behind bars because some woman had regrets about sex.

This is not the case here but the fact that you are even willing to go to such extent as to recite statute and say the guy could be put on trial should be very disburbing for all males out there...regardless of state.

[RedJacket]

Originally Posted by misswee

Yeah, I think you hit the nail with the hammer there.... I think I was testing him.... I think I feel sad, because, well NONE of my guy friends have or would do that to me.....
.

Batteries not included.

[texas_dave11]

Originally Posted by JSizzle225

I'm simply too awesome to be talking to you. Goodbye.

Tell the mayor of Candyland I said hi.

[starsfalling]

Originally Posted by misswee

A little of both mabey??

I find him attractive, so mabey I want to get rid of him before I get hurt???

Yeah, runnaway bride syndrome, big time here...

Someone please kick my *****???

mabey=maybe Please, remember this.

Also, too much drama surrounds you, or you manufacture drama constantly. Either way, I can't respond to this thread because I would insult you, and that is beneath me.