Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you found out early in a relationship (before deep feelings were involved) that the guy you were dating had a small “package”..(size of 4” or less), would you continue dating him? I know there are gonna be those that say “it’s not the size, it’s the motion, etc” or “we can bring in toys” etc…, but the bottom line is: would you commit yourself to a long-term relationship with a guy if you learn early on that he’s not physically equipped to give you pleasure, sans toys and/or other stimulation?
I know there are gonna be those that say “it’s not the size, it’s the motion, etc” or “we can bring in toys” etc…
That's exactly what I would say. On top of which, sex is good because I love my husband and we've gotten to know one another and what each other likes. It's not good because he's superbly equipped or crazy talented or anything.
I tried to wait until marriage for sex (failed) but if I had succeeded I would have had no idea what I was getting in that department until after we were married. That didn't worry me at all.
That's exactly what I would say. On top of which, sex is good because I love my husband and we've gotten to know one another and what each other likes. It's not good because he's superbly equipped or crazy talented or anything.
I tried to wait until marriage for sex (failed) but if I had succeeded I would have had no idea what I was getting in that department until after we were married. That didn't worry me at all.
My only thing with toys, etc is: who wants to deal with that every time you want to have sex? What if you want it spur of the moment? What if you're on vacation and don't want to pack toys? What if you don't want all of your satisfaction to come orally? If the guy had little equipment to get the job done, without help, it would seem taxing to have to use toys, games, etc every time you wanted to get it on.
If you found out early in a relationship (before deep feelings were involved) that the guy you were dating had a small “package”..(size of 4” or less), would you continue dating him? I know there are gonna be those that say “it’s not the size, it’s the motion, etc” or “we can bring in toys” etc…, but the bottom line is: would you commit yourself to a long-term relationship with a guy if you learn early on that he’s not physically equipped to give you pleasure, sans toys and/or other stimulation?
Why do guys always think bigger is better??
It's not the size of the boat, but the motion of the ocean that women care about
It's not the size of the boat, but the motion of the ocean that women care about
But if the oar is diminutive, how many waves can one expect to make?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
