Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I do not think those who disagree with Christianity in this regard are "immoral". However, whether they know it or not, it is an immoral viewpoint and contributes to the overwhelming immorality everywhere today. Not all viewpoints are equal; there are some things that are always immoral, no matter what the individual believes.
Here you are contradicting yourself.
Is cohabitating before marriage immoral and wrong or not? It works out for tons of people and theres also tons of people who are not Christian, and therefore doesn't need to listen to what your "God" has to say.
This is the exact "holier than thou" attitude I'm taling about. My viewpoint is "equal" and it is not immoral or wrong. I'd love to see you prove me otherwise.
Yeah, then quit biotching and moaning that the christians bother you.
If you are so fricking sure of your beliefs, why do you flinch?? Do the Christians make you insecure??
The OP bothers me with his "holier than thou" attitude where he thinks my viewpoint is less equal than his and that it's immoral and wrong(when tons of people do it).
I'll ***** and moan as much as I please about ignorant people who can't let people live their lifes the way they want to without judging them.
Freedom of speach? Ok, then I'll say he's an ignorant real life version of Ned Flanders who should shut the **** up about what he considers immoral and wrong because ultimately if you believe in god you might aswell believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny. Hows that for freedom of speach?
I'm not forcing him to think anything, I'm simply saying that it's not immoral or wrong to cohabitate or have sex before marriage. And that is a fact, no matter how you twist it with your ultra-conservative childish views it's perfectly acceptable for hundreds of millions of people around the world who it works out just fine for.
And people also have the freedom to be offended by what he says and have their own say about it too.
Exactly.
I don't get whats so hard to understand. Neither view is immoral and wrong, it really is that simple, and THAT is why I take offence. Because he actually has the nerve to judge other people and say that their ways are wrong and immoral without having anything to back it up with.
Freedom of speach? Ok, then I'll say he's an ignorant real life version of Ned Flanders who should shut the **** up about what he considers immoral and wrong because ultimately if you believe in god you might aswell believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny. Hows that for freedom of speach?
I'm not forcing him to think anything, I'm simply saying that it's not immoral or wrong to cohabitate or have sex before marriage. And that is a fact, no matter how you twist it with your ultra-conservative childish views it's perfectly acceptable for hundreds of millions of people around the world who it works out just fine for.
your thoughts are not a problem for me. so what i'm gonna say is "ok."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
