Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm wondering what a rent-a-wife would be like, LOL.
Him: Ugh, what a day at the office. I am worn out. Our client presentation is on Friday and I don't know if we'll be ready ... the Phoenix office is still not up to speed. And Kevin's new assistant sits right outside my office and smacks gum all day. It's horrible--I'm sorry, am I boring you?
Her: No, by all means, go ahead. I've made $20 since you started talking.
A woman who's attracted to a guy's looks versus a woman's who attracted to his wealth (include a bit of social status), which one's more superficial?
I'm wondering this because it seems more okay for women to admit that they're attracted to an attractive person rather than a rich person. A lot of my friends easily say that another guy's "hot" but rarely compliments him on his wealth.
Now, is wealth becoming less important than physical attraction or are women ashamed of liking a man for his wealth?
Personally, I think it's more superficial for woman to like a guy's looks. Most guys have to earn their money themselves while genetics play a bigger role for looks.
I might be a bit biased since I'm richer than I am good looking. But, I'm not rich on an absolute sense since I'm not very attractive.
I think the first attraction would be for the looks, how would she know if he was wealthy or not?And though looks might draw her near....it's personality that will draw her closer..I think wealth is a definate bonus, but usually just an added bonus to the man himself.
They are both superficial, but you can make an argument for 'looks' being less so because you are going to have to have sex with the person and you can't do that if you're not attracted to them physically.
A woman who's attracted to a guy's looks versus a woman's who attracted to his wealth (include a bit of social status), which one's more superficial?
I won't address the mindset of the woman but I will observe that while both wealth and appearance are transitory, only wealth is based upon an illusion; appearance is reality.
All too often people can decide what you are without ever knowing you, the good and the bad, the person. For this reason I tend to hide my income, I prefer to be judged on merit, not labeled on sight.
The question is ridiculous because of one salient point: VERY few people are wealthy. So they tend to stand out.
Many people are good-looking or reasonably attractive, so it's hardly shallow to be attracted to those types. Women who specifically go after wealthy men, target a very, very select group of men and will take them for a ride, regardless of their looks. Almost everyone is attracted to good looks! Most women are NOT attracted to wealthy men solely for their money. Vast difference.
Which is more superficial-a woman attracted to a man because he is rich OR a man attracted to a woman because she is hot/beautiful?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
another thread from another guy with a broken self image wondering why women won't date him.
