Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The same way you pulled a few case out of your ass about women living in poverty after divorces(which is not the majority) and can pull some out of mine about women hitting the mega jack pot for doing nothing but marrying rich men. See how it goes both ways, so your point means nothing.
These statistics of women living in poverty after the divorce is nothing but false. Then again, that's feminists making false statistics.
The top ten...read that The top 10. If the divorce rate is between 40 and 50%, 10 it's like spitting and thinking it's a rainstorm.
I know what it says you , I was trying to make a point about people saying well some women end up in poverty therefore the divorce doesn't benefit the women.
The same way you pulled a few case out of your ass about women living in poverty after divorces(which is not the majority) and can pull some out of mine about women hitting the mega jack pot for doing nothing but marrying rich men. See how it goes both ways, so your point means nothing.
You obviously have no grasp on reality and you are quite set of playing your silly game of not bothering to read anything.
I'm not going to post anything, you go do some researching before you come back here spouting nonsense.
Honestly, some posters are just so intellectually lazy these days.
How could divorced women (and if they have an offspring) live in poverty after getting paid a large settlement after the divorce?
First off the majority of people are middle of the road incomes and I've yet to meet anyone, man or woman, who got paid a huge suit case sized large settlement and I have 12 aunts and uncles all divorced, some more than once.
Secondly, the person paying alimony can write all of it off as a tax deduction while the receiver of it must pay income taxes on it.
Third, I see we've come to the bitter-he-man-know-nothing-about-divorce segment of our program. I'm not sure if those of you posting on the last couple pages have read the whole thread, but you might want to in order to avoid trite BS posts.
Because the majority of divorced women do not get anything close to a "large settlement".
No ,they just get the house(if they had one) and child support at the very least. If thats not enough to live on then the women was probably a loser begain with.
No ,they just get the house(if they had one) and child support at the very least. If thats not enough to live on then the women was probably a loser begain with.
What good is it to "get the house" if she can't afford the mortgage payment, utilities, and maintenance costs on one salary?
No ,they just get the house(if they had one) and child support at the very least. If thats not enough to live on then the women was probably a loser begain with.
Seriously, are you 12 years old? Since when did paying to support your children and provide for their needs some kind of pay off for one of the divorcing parties?
These posts are getting juvenile and sliding downhill fast. Read the thread then get back to us.
What good is it to "get the house" if she can't afford the mortgage payment, utilities, and maintenance costs on one salary?
The house belong to the man. He brought it in the first place and the home was his before he married her.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
