U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-27-2011, 12:29 PM
 
Location: Cumberland Co., TN
11,454 posts, read 11,394,428 times
Reputation: 11699

Advertisements

Quote:
No skank/slutty/revealing clothes for men because there is no interest by either men nor women for it.
Flamboyant gay men.

Quote:
Women, back in the day, seemed to dress with more décor, self-respect, less revealing, etc.
So did men.

Quote:
That is why I said that back in the day women didn’t find it necessary to dress slutty/skanky/revealing to attract men. Not saying it is wrong but is it really necessary to dress that way to attract men?
Apparently, that is what the majority of men are attracted to, otherwise you wouldnt be seeing it. Men control the fashion industry and the media. Sexy sells.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2011, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
13,217 posts, read 10,877,922 times
Reputation: 20462
Women have always dressed in ways that show off their figures to attract men. Even before the era of bare midriffs and short skirts, women would show off their shoulders, their nipped-in waists and ample busoms, their elegant wrists, their necks. It may seem chaste to us now, but they were working what they had.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 01:47 PM
 
102 posts, read 90,013 times
Reputation: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS Jaun View Post
Obviously not into football! I don't think it is a gay tendancy to take an opposing player out. Football is a Testosterone (Male) based game.
Yup. So is gay sex...Testosterone based...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Cumberland Co., TN
11,454 posts, read 11,394,428 times
Reputation: 11699
Quote:
Originally Posted by fleetiebelle View Post
Women have always dressed in ways that show off their figures to attract men. Even before the era of bare midriffs and short skirts, women would show off their shoulders, their nipped-in waists and ample busoms, their elegant wrists, their necks. It may seem chaste to us now, but they were working what they had.
LOL. So true. I remember when my little bro. found dads hidden stash of playboy mags. Most were old, black and white photos and the women werent even naked, just in skimpy outfits. No one would blink and eye at that now but Im sure in the day it was racy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 03:22 PM
 
19,081 posts, read 12,581,190 times
Reputation: 13237
Quote:
Originally Posted by onihC View Post
No skank/slutty/revealing clothes for men because there is no interest by either men nor women for it. Women, back in the day, seemed to dress with more décor, self-respect, less revealing, etc.
Back in the day fit whatever the current trends were. Clothing was indeed risqué for the times providing you're not drawing on TV land. It makes no difference. There are no prostitutes without john's and no John's without prostitutes. That's an extreme analogy, but play between the sexes are the same. Employ a bit of logic here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 03:32 PM
 
5,051 posts, read 2,909,445 times
Reputation: 2612
Quote:
Originally Posted by Braunwyn View Post
Back in the day fit whatever the current trends were. Clothing was indeed risqué for the times providing you're not drawing on TV land. It makes no difference
You’re right, time makes no difference. Regardless of being year 1800 or present time, doesn’t change the fact that it is women the ones who dress skanky/slutty/revealing, not men.

Ok, back to topic…

Girls who say they won’t have sex until marriage are admired and respected.
Guys who say they won’t have sex until marriage have their sexuality questioned, are ridiculed, disrespected, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 04:03 PM
 
19,081 posts, read 12,581,190 times
Reputation: 13237
Quote:
Originally Posted by onihC View Post
You’re right, time makes no difference. Regardless of being year 1800 or present time, doesn’t change the fact that it is women the ones who dress skanky/slutty/revealing, not men.

Ok, back to topic…

Girls who say they won’t have sex until marriage are admired and respected.
Guys who say they won’t have sex until marriage have their sexuality questioned, are ridiculed, disrespected, etc.
Back on topic nothing. You're being intentionally obtuse. Grow up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2011, 04:32 PM
 
5,051 posts, read 2,909,445 times
Reputation: 2612
Quote:
Originally Posted by Braunwyn View Post
Back on topic nothing. You're being intentionally obtuse. Grow up.
Well, then reply to my comment. Here it goes again:

You’re right, time makes no difference. Regardless of being year 1800 or present time, doesn’t change the fact that it is women the ones who dress skanky/slutty/revealing, not men.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2011, 09:16 AM
 
7,532 posts, read 6,257,225 times
Reputation: 6678
Quote:
Originally Posted by Percentage View Post
Wait a minute, do YOU want to wear panties?
Wait a cotton-pickin minute!!!

Who dug up this thread?!? That was a long time ago!!!

I have changed....WAIT I mean...NO NO NO!!! I never.

Hee hee.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2011, 02:09 PM
 
2,114 posts, read 1,275,528 times
Reputation: 1731
Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCal Dude View Post
Never mind the criminal courts. Man hits woman, goes to jail. Woman hits man, man still goes to jail.
Or man hits and rapes woman and woman must pay spousal support AND his court fees!

Victim Ordered to Pay Attacker Spousal Support - Yahoo! News

Quote:
The jury heard a damning audiotape of the attack secretly recorded by Crystal Harris, and her husband was convicted of forced oral copulation.
Even so, in 2010, the year their divorce became finalized, he requested spousal support. The judge awarded him $1,000 a month, and also asked Crystal Harris to pay $47,000 of her ex-husband's legal fees from the divorce proceedings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $84,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 AM.

© 2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top