Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 04-04-2012, 12:19 PM
 
14,725 posts, read 33,357,750 times
Reputation: 8949

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Braunwyn View Post
It's a loaded gender specific insult. Imagine calling a man a little a b*tch. That's pretty darn insulting because it's a negative term meant for women, so it's a double whammy. At best, it's fitting for gay men and women. You, like most, are conditioned to blindly accept.
Wow, your brain is working pretty well at 6:30 am Boston time.

Correct, we're all conditioned to make certain abstractions. One is that feminist equates with carpet muncher.

 
Old 04-04-2012, 12:22 PM
 
14,725 posts, read 33,357,750 times
Reputation: 8949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yzette View Post
Perhaps some would be happy if the OP now went back and started a thread titled "Is there a prick look?" Then we'd know they were talking about men, and to phrase our responses accordingly.
I mentioned that same concept somewhere in this thread. There is a pr!ck look. Because of the double standard, it doesn't bother me.
 
Old 04-04-2012, 12:23 PM
 
8,679 posts, read 15,263,675 times
Reputation: 15342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Cash View Post
ya, its like in the politics forum, I really love Ron Paul and his ideas, but people have rightly criticized "Paul-bots" that ALWAYS try to bring him up in EVERY single thread, and I sometimes check myself and try to just discuss the issue at hand in the specific thread lol. Its almost as if these two posters I alluded to are playing the ROLES of "feminist" and "chauvinist" lol

Best part is that the OP hasn't returned since the first post!
 
Old 04-04-2012, 12:23 PM
 
Location: in Mary Ann and Ginger's hut
639 posts, read 828,001 times
Reputation: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertpolyglot View Post
I mentioned that same concept somewhere in this thread. There is a pr!ck look. Because of the double standard, it doesn't bother me.
gelled hair, Ed Hardy/Affliction tees? lol
 
Old 04-04-2012, 12:26 PM
 
14,725 posts, read 33,357,750 times
Reputation: 8949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Cash View Post
gelled hair, Ed Hardy/Affliction tees? lol
As an aside, did Mary Anne and Ginger share a hut?
 
Old 04-04-2012, 12:27 PM
 
Location: Whiteville Tennessee
8,262 posts, read 18,478,817 times
Reputation: 10150
When I think of the "bitchy look" I think of Mrs.Olsen on Little House on the Prairie.
 
Old 04-04-2012, 12:28 PM
 
Location: in Mary Ann and Ginger's hut
639 posts, read 828,001 times
Reputation: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertpolyglot View Post
As an aside, did Mary Anne and Ginger share a hut?
ya, check my "Location" in my profile lol
 
Old 04-04-2012, 12:28 PM
 
8,679 posts, read 15,263,675 times
Reputation: 15342
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertpolyglot View Post
I mentioned that same concept somewhere in this thread. There is a pr!ck look. Because of the double standard, it doesn't bother me.

Like it or not, we'd all do well to realize that some terms in the English language are gender-specific.

Indeed, I could just as easily argue that the non-specificity of terms aimed at men makes insulting them worse.

Ahole. Bastard. Even mild words like "jerk." People tend think of men when those words are said, even though the terms themselves do not denote gender, like beyotch does with female dogs.

Wait. I'm a feminist. I should be railing about how male behavior ruined three perfectly good non-specific words.
 
Old 04-04-2012, 12:32 PM
 
14,725 posts, read 33,357,750 times
Reputation: 8949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yzette View Post
Ahole. Bastard. Even mild words like "jerk." People tend think of men when those words are said, even though the terms themselves do not denote gender, like beyotch does with female dogs.
But pr!ck carries the most "punch" and definitely denotes gender. Again, when used about someone else, men either shrug or agree. We don't take the "bleeding heart" empathy route to defend that person. It's usually an accurate assessment.
 
Old 04-04-2012, 12:43 PM
 
19,046 posts, read 25,182,643 times
Reputation: 13485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yzette View Post
Has nothing to do with conditioning and everything to do with the fact that I choose not to be hypersensitive and offended at every little word people use. Indeed, the tendency to take personal affront at every utterance is a rather b*tchy trait. Have a nice day!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yzette View Post
but I have a reputation as one of C-D's staunchest feminists.
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertpolyglot View Post
One is that feminist equates with carpet muncher.
Yep, real nice. Of course, words don't have power. No, not at all.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top