Snake husband buys $1.5M worth of bling at Neiman Marcus so his GF can get the commission (wife, woman)

[no kudzu]

and Neiman Marcus will not take any of it back despite their generous return policy. His ex wife is suing Neiman Marcus and the GF is still employed as a personal shopper.

Neiman Marcus Shopper Says She Was Betrayed, Sues Over $1.4M Return - ABC News

[aragx6]

I imagine timely is the key phrase in the return policy. And how is NM culpable for her husband and the personal shopper's actions? Why should the GF have been disciplined? This case is nonsense -- I don't blame this woman for being angry and bitter, but it's misplaced.

[TheImportersWife]

Team NM here.

[no kudzu]

But Neiman Marcus has built it's reputation on it's incredible return policy and she tried to return these things in a timely manner. I'm thinking it is the volume which has them ticked but they have not given a reason for not taking the things back. As I understand it, she has had these things in storage and not worn any of it after they would not take it back.

The moral of the story is don't underestimate the sleaziness of a husband when a woman is sick in bed. Why would she need furs and bangles when she was in bed recovering from this horrendous accident? Hope she got a good divorce settlement.

[himain]

She needs to get over it and move on. Sell the stuff out of the storage unit and use that money to move on. Good god

[bellakin123]

Originally Posted by no kudzu

But Neiman Marcus has built it's reputation on it's incredible return policy and she tried to return these things in a timely manner. I'm thinking it is the volume which has them ticked but they have not given a reason for not taking the things back. As I understand it, she has had these things in storage and not worn any of it after they would not take it back.

The moral of the story is don't underestimate the sleaziness of a husband when a woman is sick in bed. Why would she need furs and bangles when she was in bed recovering from this horrendous accident? Hope she got a good divorce settlement.

Exactly. I doubt NM gets in the middle of domestic disputes which may be another reason for them not to refund the items but I definitely agree it probably has more to do with the dollar value.

[Dragonfly8]

The goods were purchased from 2007 to 2010. NM does not have to take back items that are 5 years old.

My opinion- the ex-wife filed this suit to bring attention to the scandalous behavior of her ex-husband and the NM personal shopper.

[lovesMountains]

Originally Posted by TheImportersWife

Team NM here.

You and me both.

What the heck did the store do wrong??

But hey, there's nothing more crazed than a woman scorned.

Her anger is sorely misplaced though.

[deliz]

Originally Posted by aragx6

I imagine timely is the key phrase in the return policy. And how is NM culpable for her husband and the personal shopper's actions? Why should the GF have been disciplined? This case is nonsense -- I don't blame this woman for being angry and bitter, but it's misplaced.

Right on. This is NOT NM fault.

[Dewdrop93]

Well, at least her husband gave them to HER and not the personal shopper!!!

Why doesn't she just sell them? Misplaced anger indeed.