Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-19-2013, 01:49 AM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
28,226 posts, read 36,715,742 times
Reputation: 28561

Advertisements

#1 is too small, #2 is too cut......

Ideal for me is an unpictured option 3.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-19-2013, 04:57 AM
 
4,699 posts, read 4,044,087 times
Reputation: 2483
Guy number 1 still seem a lot more skinny than the average guy. His tummy is not even visible.

This is more like an average guy.

Last edited by picmod; 01-10-2014 at 04:51 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 07:13 AM
 
219 posts, read 329,559 times
Reputation: 223
Lol typical women with opinions all over the place. These are obviously before and after pictures and it is supposed to be clear that the "after" guy is supposed to look better. The guy in 2 has more muscle mass, is more lean, he even did his hair, shaved his face, and the lighting is better, yet many women here are still picking guy 1 LOL. It's almost like they know guy 2 is "supposed" to look better but they don't want to openly admit it. I'm pretty sure all the men in this thread would unanimously pick #2 for their physique if they had a choice. I would feel terrible if I put all that work into my body only to be told by a woman that I was more attractive before I did anything.

They have done studies to show that women tend to have great variance in what they find attractive whereas men are more uniform in what they consider attractive. I think the posts here so far have demonstrated that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 07:36 AM
 
752 posts, read 1,160,165 times
Reputation: 397
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
Well, I am from California, ladies here myself included do not like the body builders' type. (Please do not hate me for saying that I am only telling the truth) There are always exceptions to the rule of course, but most women here are into swimmer's body type. Long lean fit, low body fat.
I'm a male and I lift, but not to serious about it. I can say that is most demotivational when I see real body builders in bars. Accurse it not look good. But at first place many of them start with one ugly asymmetric body. When they acquire some mass they are just ugly folks with muscle mass. Theirs ugly bone structure is still always there. So question "do women like bodybuilders" is somewhat misleading as in bodybuilders range you can set many kind of people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 07:44 AM
 
Location: NC
6,032 posts, read 9,173,066 times
Reputation: 6378

bigger faster stronger film clip featuring Rick Schaff - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 10:06 AM
 
5,312 posts, read 6,079,489 times
Reputation: 4110
I find it hillarious how women complain about how men have unrealstic standards of womens bodies then put in the same position women do the same thing with men lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
38,968 posts, read 27,353,595 times
Reputation: 15909
Quote:
Originally Posted by tipitop View Post
I'm a male and I lift, but not to serious about it. I can say that is most demotivational when I see real body builders in bars. Accurse it not look good. But at first place many of them start with one ugly asymmetric body. When they acquire some mass they are just ugly folks with muscle mass. Theirs ugly bone structure is still always there. So question "do women like bodybuilders" is somewhat misleading as in bodybuilders range you can set many kind of people.
That is true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 10:14 AM
 
Location: moved
13,575 posts, read 9,594,825 times
Reputation: 23322
OK, the initially counterintuitive appeal of the scrawny-guy is now starting to dawn on me. Many women are saying that...

- - The “muscular” guy’s life revolves around the gym. He’d have no time for a girlfriend. The girlfriend would just be an appendage instead of a priority.


- - The “muscular” guy is narcissistic and obsessed with appearance; he’s preening and vain. That’s a character flaw and a basic immaturity.

I get that. As a weightlifter myself, I’m not impressed with guy #2. He’s more interested in cosmetic appeal of muscles than real strength. There’s something effete about him. Plus, his transformation appears to be more of a quick-fix than a lifelong commitment.

So if I may, let me rephrase the OP’s question: on purely physical grounds and disregarding how pursuit of fitness does or does not affect personality, to what extent is bulk-muscle (in men) appealing to women?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 10:29 AM
 
14,078 posts, read 16,534,867 times
Reputation: 17654
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohio_peasant View Post
So if I may, let me rephrase the OP’s question: on purely physical grounds and disregarding how pursuit of fitness does or does not affect personality, to what extent is bulk-muscle (in men) appealing to women?
On purely physical grounds, Guy #2 is a lot more appealing. Guy #1 isn't sexy to me. His body doesn't make me lust after him, but I could easily lust after Guy #2.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2013, 10:38 AM
 
5,258 posts, read 9,118,252 times
Reputation: 3316
I don't see what's wrong with a guy who wants to put in a little time at the gym to look like #2. There are plenty of men who look like #2 whose lives don't revolve around living in the gym or rejecting any type of food that has even a little bit of fat. Although #1 isn't bad, I'm much more attracted to #2, and as long as he wouldn't put our relationship on the backburner and devote himself COMPLETELY to working out, I'd much rather have a #2 over a #1.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top