Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-03-2013, 03:20 PM
 
Location: Chicago
3,391 posts, read 4,481,097 times
Reputation: 7857

Advertisements

I always thought calling someone "my fiance" implied that you had agreed to get married, and that the wedding would take place within a fairly short amount of time--maybe a year or two.

However, I keep running into people who have been "engaged" for 5, 6, even 7 or more years. Some even have kids.

I am not questioning people's right to conduct their relationships as they choose. But at what point does calling someone "my fiance" begin to raise eyebrows?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2013, 03:21 PM
 
3,549 posts, read 5,375,525 times
Reputation: 3769
A fiance is when you propose and put a ring on their finger IMO... After that, it can take however long.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 03:33 PM
 
1,839 posts, read 3,065,818 times
Reputation: 1102
I think the OP has a point. Get married already. 5+ years ??? Plus it is a joke when you claim to have a fiancée and act like a player. (not trying to state the obvious here) Fiancee implies serious commitment, so live it don't just throw around a word.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 03:35 PM
 
15,013 posts, read 21,646,900 times
Reputation: 12334
More than a year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
7,844 posts, read 13,232,605 times
Reputation: 9247
Quote:
Originally Posted by RogersParkGuy View Post
I always thought calling someone "my fiance" implied that you had agreed to get married, and that the wedding would take place within a fairly short amount of time--maybe a year or two.

However, I keep running into people who have been "engaged" for 5, 6, even 7 or more years. Some even have kids.

I am not questioning people's right to conduct their relationships as they choose. But at what point does calling someone "my fiance" begin to raise eyebrows?

I think you have a good point. I knew a few people who were engaged for over 10 years. Some had children, some didn't. They lived together, bought homes, made lives together but married such a long time after they got engaged.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Sunny Florida
7,136 posts, read 12,671,168 times
Reputation: 9547
When it gets to be like Oprah and Steadman it's a joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 03:47 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,344 posts, read 60,534,984 times
Reputation: 60925
When he goes from "fiance" to "baby daddy". Then scoots on support, changes his phone number and claims in Court that he's homeless. Is happening to a friend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 04:12 PM
 
2,758 posts, read 4,958,018 times
Reputation: 3014
I wonder if people use fiancé in the OP more for social means...

Let's say you are living together for an extended time. And he hasn't' popped the question. Friends and family of the woman or man start asking questions. Eventually they start talking about their s/o as fiancé. This is probably due to societal expectations and pressures.
Thing is, most people don't realize that after a year or two, people that pressure others, start going:

Some people believe that getting married is what 'we are supposed to do'.

More than anything, the pressure of society has people calling each other fiancé, just to shut up the masses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 04:29 PM
 
Location: On the corner of Grey Street
6,126 posts, read 10,106,089 times
Reputation: 11796
I wouldn't want to get engaged if I wasn't going to be married within a year afterwards. I definitely think it's weird to be engaged for 10 years, but whatever works I guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2013, 08:02 PM
 
14,376 posts, read 18,368,101 times
Reputation: 43059
Meh, my old boss got married after an engagement that lasted nearly a decade. She had been with the guy who is now her husband since she was 18 - she didn't see the need to formalize it. Plus they had two ginormous families who would expect the "full pageant" wedding, and she was dreading that. After around 15 or 20 years together, they decided to have children, so they got married.

The way I figure, you can call it whatever you want. It's no skin off my back how someone chooses to define their relationship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top