U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-21-2013, 06:20 AM
 
Location: Metro Detroit
1,106 posts, read 1,081,648 times
Reputation: 675

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by iknowftbll View Post
The article is one data point on the curve. There are plenty of examples to support your argument as well as the opposite. I don't know who has it easier, to be honest. I think when we talk in aggregate numbers we lose sight of the fact that we're talking human behavior and it can be difficult to predict or quantify. Real people with real preferences are not necessarily going to behave the same way as the cohorts in front of them or behind them.
5' 7" and I've been with more beautiful women (not fat, pretty face, nice body curvatious or slender but NOT fat. The normal definition of what most men call beautiful) than the average guy by a long shot. Land beasts, like the one in this article, do not have it easier. In fact, it's probably quite the opposite.

Sure someone will go hogging at the bar occasionally after a long dry spell, or there the chubby chasers (rare), or its the best they can do. By no measure do cows have it easier than "short" men in finding a long term mate of ***decent value***.

 
Old 06-21-2013, 07:12 AM
 
Location: Center of the universe
24,757 posts, read 32,859,759 times
Reputation: 11780
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetJockey View Post
Yep, and for those who do online dating it's amazing how many men are very obviously obese (and I'm not talking in the 'might be a linebacker' sense) and describe themselves as 'average' or 'athletic'. Yeah...no. And many of those guys have stipulations like 'must be under 130 lbs', 'no fat chicks' etc etc.

I'm on OKcupid and I did a general search for 'no fat chicks' and had a BLAST reading those profiles

I need to get out more
Did you see the ones that said "no fat men?"
 
Old 06-21-2013, 07:26 AM
 
Location: Center of the universe
24,757 posts, read 32,859,759 times
Reputation: 11780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stockyman View Post
But that's the problem, obesity rates are increasing bringing other types of health problems. Most obese/overweight people are not losing the weight, it's only getting worse.
And treating them as pariahs is going to help?
 
Old 06-21-2013, 08:13 AM
 
11,223 posts, read 9,206,051 times
Reputation: 14632
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhenomenalAJ View Post
That woman is deluding herself in thinking her man isn't a chubby chaser. The only guys who date those women are guys who can't do any better or fetishists; she's quite lucky to have found a man who likes riding the blimps.

OP: I like fat women.
PhenomenalAJ: No you don't. I know what you like better than you do.

 
Old 06-21-2013, 08:24 AM
 
13,658 posts, read 16,205,242 times
Reputation: 10415
What I don't understand is why women's appearances get fussed over, nitpicked and even discussed so much. It's unnerving.
 
Old 06-21-2013, 08:35 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
21,420 posts, read 22,643,063 times
Reputation: 45019
Quote:
Originally Posted by somebodynew View Post
OP: I like fat women.
PhenomenalAJ: No you don't. I know what you like better than you do.

Welcome to the internet.
 
Old 06-21-2013, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Metro Detroit
1,106 posts, read 1,081,648 times
Reputation: 675
Quote:
Originally Posted by srjth View Post
What I don't understand is why women's appearances get fussed over, nitpicked and even discussed so much. It's unnerving.
Lol. Because as much as feminists want it to be untrue, the majority of a woman's value (her ability to attract a mate of value) is derived from her appearance.

If this were not true, why do the majority of men with endless options almost UNIVERSALLY choose slender pretty faced women?
 
Old 06-21-2013, 08:55 AM
 
13,658 posts, read 16,205,242 times
Reputation: 10415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caddy1316 View Post
Lol. Because as much as feminists want it to be untrue, the majority of a woman's value (her ability to attract a mate of value) is derived from her appearance.

If this were not true, why do the majority of men with endless options almost UNIVERSALLY choose slender pretty faced women?
Women don't like to reduced to that, just like men don't like to be reduced to their bank accounts. It's very unromantic.
 
Old 06-21-2013, 08:55 AM
 
Location: NW Indiana
39,332 posts, read 14,403,359 times
Reputation: 99333
I think this tread has run its course. Since it's no longer staying on topic, it's closed.
__________________
My posts as a Moderator will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS And check this out: FAQ
Moderator of Canada (and sub-fora), Illinois (and sub-fora), Indiana (and sub-fora), Automotive, Caregiving, Community Chat, Fashion & Beauty, Hair Care, Games/Trivia, History, Nature, Psychology, Travel, Work & Employment, Writing.
___________________________
~ Life's a gift. Don't waste it. ~
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top