Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It all depends on how much the price drops with legalization, how much hotter of a prostitute you could hire than you could land in the dating world, what you are able to get women in the dating world to do in bed vs what you can hire out.
Sure guys that can get reasonably attractive women in the dating world AND get women who will do what they need in bed will have no reason to go to a hooker. Because if you can get that in the dating world PLUS the emotional/love part/long term companion why on earth would you visit a hooker.
The only reason a guy would hire a prostitute is if he could not land a reasonably attractive non prude woman in real life. Or if he could not land a woman period.
Legal reasonably priced prostititues would force women in the dating world to up their game as well, you would see more women willing to do more in bed.
Just weeding out the women who don't swa**ow cuts the pool down quite a bit which is unfortunate.
I don't think the price would drop. In Nevada, it's very $$$ in the legal brothels. I don't think a lot of the guys use them because they can't get girls, many are businessmen, married people, etc who just want quick and uncomplicated sex. I also don't think it would force women to "up their game" in any way. There are already tons of women who are not prostitutes who are uninhibited and adventurous in bed.
I think it's well suited for it to be allowed at least in my country for my personal benefit.
I state my personal benefit as then perhaps it'll lessen the about of what I see as male whining about how dating is oh so easier for gals which really seems to be about how they can't have as much sex with as many attractive gals as they want as easily as gals can have sex with guys. Plus it may lessen the about of approaches I get if guys have other viable legal sex options as I find the sole intention of most female-male interaction is the male getting sex.
The general effect of this will likely be gals being pressured even more to forgo themselves and please the male by not only fearing that another gal will take his attention if she's not putting out enough for him but that he can just up and get a prostitute if she won't do what he want. As well as likely guys being even less motivated to please gals than they are even now as why bother pleasing their partner when they can just get a prostitute who will focus on pleasing him. So basically to me this will be result in even more of the seemingly typical gals doing more to please guys and guys doing noting to little to please gals.
I don't think the price would drop. In Nevada, it's very $$$ in the legal brothels. I don't think a lot of the guys use them because they can't get girls, many are businessmen, married people, etc who just want quick and uncomplicated sex. I also don't think it would force women to "up their game" in any way. There are already tons of women who are not prostitutes who are uninhibited and adventurous in bed.
Its expensive because its the only county in the USA where its legal and its HIGHLY regulated. When any woman can throw our her business for an incall anywhere in the nation it will change the game considerably.
If the price does not change considerably then the legalization will be irrelevant and rape and going postal will still happen. Most guys cant afford $300 a pop, if it went down to say 40-50 it would be a game changer.
I think it's well suited for it to be allowed at least in my country then perhaps it'll lessen the about of what I see as male whining about how dating is oh so easier for gals which really seems to be about how they can't have as much sex with as many attractive gals as they want as easily as gals can have sex with guys. Plus it may lessen the about of approaches I get if guys have other viable legal sex options as I find the sole intention of most female-male interaction is the male getting sex.
Correct, then you will know that when a man approaches you he wants the whole package because if he just wanted sex he could go throw down a couple 20's and get what he wants, which is what your dinner and drinks will cost anyways.
In other countries prostitution is the norm. I've had several European friends tell me of their regular weekly mistress trips.
i don't get the connection between mistresses and prostitution. seems like a giant leap to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mighty_Pelican
Escorts aren't sex workers. And it is false that the biggest share of clients are losers who cannot get sex without paying for it.
the far majority have sex for money, even though for legal purposes they state that payment is for their time and not for any specific services. but they would not be long for business if they didn't provide sexual services.
That is ideal but having legal CHEAP prostitution would be a god send if your ever in a rough dry spell. At the end of the day I would rather have a nice BJ than my hand.
I don't want any parting gifts i.e herpes. I'll just stay home, save my cash and have at myself
Correct, then you will know that when a man approaches you he wants the whole package because if he just wanted sex he could go throw down a couple 20's and get what he wants, which is what your dinner and drinks will cost anyways.
No I will not know he is approaching because he wants the whole package as many dates cost far less than a couple of 20's or in fact free and perhaps he is approaching because he can't afford prostitutes.
Though nice on seemingly agreeing that most female-male interaction is about the male getting sex.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.