Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-04-2014, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Illinois
4,751 posts, read 5,437,466 times
Reputation: 13001

Advertisements

While I get what you all are saying, why is it the responsibility of the parent (and in most cases it's the woman)? If you are a guy and you don't want to date a woman with more than two kids, just say so in your profile. That way she can skip you since you wouldn't be interested in her.

Chow, I'm guessing you haven't had to deal with online dating since you're in a relationship, but most sites that I have been on allow you to tailor your criteria very specifically - there are boxes to check or questions to answer about children, smoking, religion, etc. On Okcupid there is a specific question that says "Will you date a person with children from a previous relationship?" And you can very simply answer "No" and make it a mandatory criteria, or you can add to your answer and say something like "Yes, but no more than 2." It's really not that difficult to filter out people you would not be interested in.

And as far as wasting time- how much time is really being wasted? You exchange a few emails and meet for coffee or dinner. Find out she has 4 kids and that's a dealbreaker for you? Oh well, you're out a few hours of your life and you move on. Not that much time or effort being wasted. It would be no different than meeting someone in real life, talk a little bit, decide to go on a date and then find out something about them doesn't work for you. It happens, people move on, it's not like you've wasted weeks or months of your life with someone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-04-2014, 12:21 PM
 
Location: So Cal
52,222 posts, read 52,648,334 times
Reputation: 52742
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonBeam33 View Post
While I get what you all are saying, why is it the responsibility of the parent (and in most cases it's the woman)? If you are a guy and you don't want to date a woman with more than two kids, just say so in your profile. That way she can skip you since you wouldn't be interested in her.

Chow, I'm guessing you haven't had to deal with online dating since you're in a relationship, but most sites that I have been on allow you to tailor your criteria very specifically - there are boxes to check or questions to answer about children, smoking, religion, etc. On Okcupid there is a specific question that says "Will you date a person with children from a previous relationship?" And you can very simply answer "No" and make it a mandatory criteria, or you can add to your answer and say something like "Yes, but no more than 2." It's really not that difficult to filter out people you would not be interested in.

And as far as wasting time- how much time is really being wasted? You exchange a few emails and meet for coffee or dinner. Find out she has 4 kids and that's a dealbreaker for you? Oh well, you're out a few hours of your life and you move on. Not that much time or effort being wasted. It would be no different than meeting someone in real life, talk a little bit, decide to go on a date and then find out something about them doesn't work for you. It happens, people move on, it's not like you've wasted weeks or months of your life with someone.
I never really said it was the woman's responsibility, I was actually pretty careful to say man or woman, a couple of times, I believe.

But yeah it goes both ways put in the profile somewhere.

You're right, I haven't online dated, so I can't speak from experience there.

As I mentioned previously, it protects both parties if people are upfront about it, that's the only point I was trying to make.

In terms of wasting time... IDK... time is precious and more importantly what if there is a spark, a connection, like I said, it would suck to have all that end if kid(s) are a deal breaker for someone.

Wasn't trying to turn this thread into some kind of anti-children one.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2014, 01:29 PM
 
Location: Illinois
4,751 posts, read 5,437,466 times
Reputation: 13001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chowhound View Post
I never really said it was the woman's responsibility, I was actually pretty careful to say man or woman, a couple of times, I believe.

But yeah it goes both ways put in the profile somewhere.

You're right, I haven't online dated, so I can't speak from experience there.

As I mentioned previously, it protects both parties if people are upfront about it, that's the only point I was trying to make.

In terms of wasting time... IDK... time is precious and more importantly what if there is a spark, a connection, like I said, it would suck to have all that end if kid(s) are a deal breaker for someone.

Wasn't trying to turn this thread into some kind of anti-children one.

I don't disagree with anything you're saying, but I believe the onus should be on the person who wants to make an exclusion, not the other way around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2014, 01:45 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
13,520 posts, read 22,124,133 times
Reputation: 20235
I don't want to waste time neither, so in addition to the number of kids, I want women to disclose on their profile:

- credit score: I'm incompatible with someone who could be fiscally irresponsible
- salary and IRA balance: I don't want to potentially be someone's sugar daddy
- home ownership status
- whether they are an alcoholic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2014, 01:52 PM
 
Location: So Cal
52,222 posts, read 52,648,334 times
Reputation: 52742
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonBeam33 View Post
I don't disagree with anything you're saying, but I believe the onus should be on the person who wants to make an exclusion, not the other way around.
I get what you mean, that's fine and dandy if the "seeker" puts in their profile that they don't want to deal with X number of kids. That makes sense.

I'm still sort of confused how the onus is on the excluder, if the excluder is the seeker, how are they able to "seek" an ad and determine if they have too many kids, if they don't list how many they have.

it's a cart before the horse sort of situation.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top