Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Exactly. I doubt that the equivalent of Bill Gates was getting laid in 12,000 BC, unless he invented fire or something. Even then, he probably got thrown into his own fire by the 12,000 BC equivalent of Dolph Lundgren.
exactly. I doubt that the equivalent of bill gates was getting laid in 12,000 bc, unless he invented fire or something. Even then, he probably got thrown into his own fire by the 12,000 bc equivalent of dolph lundgren.
I see what you're saying, but shouldn't it go the other way? Since women aren't dependent on men, they don't have to get with anybody they don't want. They can date who they find attractive.
Yes, but because they aren't dependent on men, "who they find attractive" can just be a guy they enjoy being with. It doesn't have to be a guy who can kill a mammoth, win a rock fight, or survive a plague.
Yes, but because they aren't dependent on men, "who they find attractive" can just be a guy they enjoy being with. It doesn't have to be a guy who can kill a mammoth, win a rock fight, or survive a plague.
But in a lot of cases that's still who they find attractive. That and bill gates. Lol
Exactly. I doubt that the equivalent of Bill Gates was getting laid in 12,000 BC, unless he invented fire or something. Even then, he probably got thrown into his own fire by the 12,000 BC equivalent of Dolph Lundgren.
Bill Gates is telling his daughters don't date the wrong nerd.Stay away from the Astrophyises. (Sp?)
3-4 to 7-8, a bit of a stretch, but it could that way for some people.
I've struggled with dating and my best guess for why. (Keep in mind this just my guess, I'm no expert lol) a lot of the single girls I met, were single for a long time. Meaning nobody was what they were looking for, aside from a few guys that wanted FWB. I don't know, but I'm gonna guess these guys they liked were also liked by many other girls.
This is exactly what I've been saying. In general, women like the same kinds of men and will only settle with someone not like that when they become desperate.
The men that you describe in this post do this because they can. Most guys can do this kind of thing, but they will have to put in a ton of effort. The top 10% don't and can get whoever they want. That's my point.
I see what you're saying, but shouldn't it go the other way? Since women aren't dependent on men, they don't have to get with anybody they don't want. They can date who they find attractive.
Women don't find nerdy, intelligent men attractive unless that guy is also great looking. So I agree with you that more attractive people are more likely to reproduce. In fact, I read that 10% of children born every year have a different father than the woman's husband. These fathers are the same men, the good-looking guys, while the provider husbands think that the child is theirs.
I don't think that the future of our race will be all good-looking people though. Remember that just because both parents are good-looking doesn't mean that the child will be good-looking. They could take after an uncle or something lol.
Damn, even on this forum I'm not sure I've ever seen anyone quite as hell-bent on selling the world on his, "I'm a loser and nobody wants me" narrative as you are. If we all agree with you, will you go away? By believing it, you've already made it true for yourself, anyway, so I'm not sure what you think you're going to gain by convincing us of it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.