Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-05-2015, 01:17 PM
 
2,183 posts, read 2,201,607 times
Reputation: 1852

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Djuna View Post
I agree with the premise. If you haven't got your act together by the time you're 35 then there's something wrong with you. Most people by that age have at least one long term relationship under their belt. If you haven't then you're either very abhorrent to the opposite sex, lazy, completely hapless or you have major psychological issues that prevent you developing a closeness to your preferred gender. Of course there will be the odd exception to this rule but in my opinion you have missed out on one of the essential milestones of human development.
Sure they missed out but they more than likely had no choice in the matter. If you are unattractive you're not going to succeed in getting anything other than rejected.

 
Old 03-05-2015, 01:19 PM
 
9,408 posts, read 13,734,422 times
Reputation: 20395
Quote:
Originally Posted by jma501 View Post
Sure they missed out but they more than likely had no choice in the matter. If you are unattractive you're not going to succeed in getting anything other than rejected.
Half the world, heck 3/4 of the world is unattractive...yet somehow they manage to find someone. I think people who constantly find themselves rejected are subconsciously projecting something unpleasant about themselves. The secret is figuring out what it is and changing it.
 
Old 03-05-2015, 01:23 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,188 posts, read 107,790,902 times
Reputation: 116087
Quote:
Originally Posted by hellomoon View Post
Okay I see your point. But relationships are very important to us humans. We are social animals. Feeling loved, having sex, a person to rely on in an intimate level is very important. So this is not the same as buying a house...see my point?
But your criterion was that a person had to have a relationship for longer than a year. Plenty of people have experienced feeling loved, at least initially, having sex, and intimacy, but don't meet this arbitrary duration requirement. So for the purposes of this discussion, we're defining "LTR" as anything beyond 1-year's duration? Someone with one yr.+ 1/2 relationship passes muster, but someone with several relationships lasting a year each, or close to it, are rejects, defined as having some fatal flaw?
 
Old 03-05-2015, 01:26 PM
 
Location: NY
9,131 posts, read 19,997,945 times
Reputation: 11707
Lets stop blaming it on being physically unattractive.

A walk through any Walmart in the country will reveal plenty of people society would consider "extremely unattractive" in a physical sense doing their shopping with their spouse or significant other. Not being considered attractive, in a general sense, is not an absolute for not being able to find companionship.

Besides, this thread was about not having a long term relationship beyond a year, which is certainly not exclusive to people who have never had any kind of romantic interaction with the opposite sex.
 
Old 03-05-2015, 01:27 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,938 posts, read 36,935,179 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Checkered24 View Post
Lets stop blaming it on being physically unattractive.
Yeah, this claim is purely bogus
 
Old 03-05-2015, 01:27 PM
 
4,038 posts, read 4,860,904 times
Reputation: 5353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djuna View Post
Half the world, heck 3/4 of the world is unattractive...yet somehow they manage to find someone. I think people who constantly find themselves rejected are subconsciously projecting something unpleasant about themselves. The secret is figuring out what it is and changing it.
Why assume it was the person with only short-term relationships that was the one who was always rejected? Maybe he or she got into a few relationships only to find the partner was a spendthrift, had psychological issues or for other reasons wasn't LTR material? 35 is still plenty of time to find a solid relationship leading to marriage. It doesn't mean someone's doomed. lol
 
Old 03-05-2015, 01:31 PM
 
9,408 posts, read 13,734,422 times
Reputation: 20395
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewbiePoster View Post
Why assume it was the person with only short-term relationships that was the one who was always rejected? Maybe he or she got into a few relationships only to find the partner was a spendthrift, had psychological issues or for other reasons wasn't LTR material? 35 is still plenty of time to find a solid relationship leading to marriage. It doesn't mean someone's doomed. lol
That would point to an issue with choosing suitable partners.

And my point was not whether it's too late to find a solid relationship, it was about the fact some people have never had a relationship at all, or very short lived ones and by the age of 35 it's pretty normal for most people to have had some semblance of a longish term relationship.
 
Old 03-05-2015, 01:35 PM
 
4,038 posts, read 4,860,904 times
Reputation: 5353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Checkered24 View Post
Lets stop blaming it on being physically unattractive.

A walk through any Walmart in the country will reveal plenty of people society would consider "extremely unattractive" in a physical sense doing their shopping with their spouse or significant other. Not being considered attractive, in a general sense, is not an absolute for not being able to find companionship.

Besides, this thread was about not having a long term relationship beyond a year, which is certainly not exclusive to people who have never had any kind of romantic interaction with the opposite sex.
It's not even about attractiveness, going by the scenario the OP set up. Someone with only short-term relationships is attractive enough to have had relationships. Maybe even a lot of 'em. So we could assume that looks aren't the obstacle for people with relationships under a year long. That means it's other criteria, like maybe the stability of the people they get involved with, or undesirable character traits that come out only after getting to know them awhile and seeing how they live and the kind of decisions they make. It could mean someone has trouble finding people of similar intelligence who are well-adjusted, financially responsible, and all that.

Or it could be that someone didn't get started dating much until they finished an extended education and got their career off the ground. So they haven't had time to find the right person for an LTR. They've been dating, maybe had a couple of shorter relationships that didn't pan out, but they're still new to the game.
 
Old 03-05-2015, 01:39 PM
 
2,183 posts, read 2,201,607 times
Reputation: 1852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djuna View Post
Half the world, heck 3/4 of the world is unattractive...yet somehow they manage to find someone. I think people who constantly find themselves rejected are subconsciously projecting something unpleasant about themselves. The secret is figuring out what it is and changing it.
I have never had a relationship yet I have had women friends over the years. So apparently I was likeable but not relationship material. You either have whatever it is that makes a person relationship material or you don't. But there is nothing wrong with me or most others whom are in the same boat.

Last edited by jma501; 03-05-2015 at 01:48 PM..
 
Old 03-05-2015, 01:46 PM
 
Location: "Silicon Valley" (part of San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA)
4,375 posts, read 4,067,341 times
Reputation: 2158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djuna View Post
Half the world, heck 3/4 of the world is unattractive...
I completely disagree with this statement. I would say at least 80% of the women I encounter are sexually attractive to one degree or another. Only 30% of Americans are obese, so 70-80% being attractive seems like a good number.

Quote:
I think people who constantly find themselves rejected are subconsciously projecting something unpleasant about themselves. The secret is figuring out what it is and changing it.
You might be right about that. To suggest that someone is "unpleasant" is offensive, but I know what you meant so we'll put that aside. But the thing is, if that aspect of your personality which seems to be undesirable for people seeking a relationship is something that is intrinsic to who you are, then it isn't something you can change, or if you could change it, you would not wish to do so.

For example, I am a shy, introverted person. I tend to make a lot of social mistakes. That's who I am. I don't want to be an extrovert because that wouldn't be Brian, that would be someone else. I want to be Brian. Now maybe that's means I'll be "nice, but..." all my life, but that's who I am. Either someone is interested or they are not. It's not anybody's fault, it's just how people feel.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top