Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is individual and it depends. My early relationships were mostly age gap relationships. As I got older the gap narrowed. Others do it differently. There is no pattern, no rhyme, no reason. No one reason that is.
It depends on the people involved. Late hubby was 7.5 years older. My (male) best friend is 6 years younger.
For me, it isn't so much about age as it is about life stages. I'm downsizing my possessions and looking at and trying to work toward early retirement. Someone who is 25, just starting out in his career and finally has a bit of financial freedom to buy "stuff" is not likely to be in the same mindset as me. Similarly, neither is someone who is already retired and spends all his free time hanging out with the grandkids.
It depends on how old you are. 18 vs 27 is bad, 25 vs 34 is somewhat bad, 30 vs 39, still bad, 80 vs 89, not a lot of difference there.
I don't know... I kind of agree with this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dewdroplet76
Age gaps relationships aren't inherently bad or good.
To convince me otherwise you would need to define "bad". The age gaps you are using as illustrations are laughably small. If you think 25 vs 34 is 'bad', I don't know what you would say about 24 vs 38 which was my first. And some celebrity age gap relationships are in multiple decades of gap. If duration is any indication they have at least the same snowballs chance as any other kind of celebrity pairing.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.