Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Say you sense your partner isn't that physically interested in you, however you were physically interested in them.. but they still wanted to marry you due to other factors - your personality, reliability etc. Would you go for it or is mutual physical attraction (as opposed to one-sided) absolutely mandatory for you?
Mutual attraction is absolutely neccessary. I need to be married to someone that can't keep their hands off of me. If there is no physical attraction, I'd consider that person a friend.
Mandatory. No chance would I enjoy sex with that person. What is the spouse going to do for physical fulfullment? Just curious.
My question was not about being attracted to that person which would obviously be a deal-breaker for most. If you were attracted to the person would you require it to be reciprocal? If you were attracted to them then you could still enjoy sex with them. They may not be that attracted to you but to keep you happy they may just agree to physical intimacy with you because they overall like you as a partner for non-physical reasons and they are willing to compromise on the physical part because it may not be that important to them.
Location: Huntersville/Charlotte, NC and Washington, DC
26,700 posts, read 41,742,544 times
Reputation: 41381
You'd have to be damn crazy to marry someone you have no physical attraction to. You'd have to be damn crazy to even go on a date with someone you have no physical attraction to.
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,962,945 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by k374
My question was not about being attracted to that person which would obviously be a deal-breaker for most. If you were attracted to the person would you require it to be reciprocal? If you were attracted to them then you could still enjoy sex with them. They may not be that attracted to you but to keep you happy they may just agree to physical intimacy with you because they overall like you as a partner for non-physical reasons and they are willing to compromise on the physical part because it may not be that important to them.
How could I enjoy sex with someone that wasn't enjoying it with me? By definition it would be bad sex.
They may not be that attracted to you but to keep you happy they may just agree to physical intimacy with you because they overall like you as a partner for non-physical reasons and they are willing to compromise on the physical part because it may not be that important to them.
Nope, wouldn't fly with me, at all.
I'm not going to be physically intimate with someone who feels that intimacy is a "favor" to me. I want them to WANT it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
