Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Statistically approx 10% of women can't orgasm at all.
Could you live with that? What would be other determining factors in your ability to live with an anorgasmic woman vs. not?
Cut from mayo clinic website:
Definition
Anorgasmia is the medical term for regular difficulty reaching orgasm after ample sexual stimulation, causing you personal distress. Anorgasmia is actually a very common occurrence. About 15 percent of women report difficulties with orgasm, and as many as 10 percent of women in the United States have never climaxed. Even women who orgasm regularly only climax about 50 percent to 70 percent of the time.
To be honest. This would wierd me out.
My wife would have one and only one...pretty much every time we had sex.
Last gf would have 1-2+ every time (giant long-lasting variety) and um....another friend is more like 3-6 per (no Im not making that up.)
If I have a fetish, (per other thread) it's giving my partners O's and it would really bother me.
I'd like to thank the moderator for moving this back.
I suppose I'm not surprised that the preponderance of replies are of the - this can be fixed variety.
But I'd like the men to try to imagine - what would a life be like with a woman who can't? Because as a woman talking to other women I think the mayo's stats are right. For some women, physically, it just doesn't happen. Not sure why, no sensitivity, something.
Thank you Mathguy and the others that said it would or wouldn't bother them.
How much would it bother you to spend the next 30-40 years with a women who was willing to have sex but couldn't get to Ohio? Would it be a deal breaker?
I'd like to thank the moderator for moving this back.
I suppose I'm not surprised that the preponderance of replies are of the - this can be fixed variety.
But I'd like the men to try to imagine - what would a life be like with a woman who can't? Because as a woman talking to other women I think the mayo's stats are right. For some women, physically, it just doesn't happen. Not sure why, no sensitivity, something.
Thank you Mathguy and the others that said it would or wouldn't bother them.
How much would it bother you to spend the next 30-40 years with a women who was willing to have sex but couldn't get to Ohio? Would it be a deal breaker?
Yes probably. The satisfaction of bringing your SO to Ohio woud be missing and I would feel selfish as a lover.
I'd like to thank the moderator for moving this back.
I suppose I'm not surprised that the preponderance of replies are of the - this can be fixed variety.
But I'd like the men to try to imagine - what would a life be like with a woman who can't? Because as a woman talking to other women I think the mayo's stats are right. For some women, physically, it just doesn't happen. Not sure why, no sensitivity, something.
Thank you Mathguy and the others that said it would or wouldn't bother them.
How much would it bother you to spend the next 30-40 years with a women who was willing to have sex but couldn't get to Ohio? Would it be a deal breaker?
Not a deal breaker at all...but she would have to be as understanding of my angst as I would have to be of her situation.
I'd like to thank the moderator for moving this back.
I suppose I'm not surprised that the preponderance of replies are of the - this can be fixed variety.
But I'd like the men to try to imagine - what would a life be like with a woman who can't? Because as a woman talking to other women I think the mayo's stats are right. For some women, physically, it just doesn't happen. Not sure why, no sensitivity, something.
Thank you Mathguy and the others that said it would or wouldn't bother them.
How much would it bother you to spend the next 30-40 years with a women who was willing to have sex but couldn't get to Ohio? Would it be a deal breaker?
It would bother me. Not to sound falsely selfless, but it is the absolute best thing about sex. I am lucky to be with a woman for whom that has never been a problem, and I just don't see how sex would be very sexy without it, or them.
Would it be a deal-breaker? Not at this stage of the game, but truthfully I don't think we would have gotten to this stage of the game if our sex was not wonderful, and for me when a woman orgasms, deeply, strongly, there is nothing sexier.
So women who can't end up alone. Isn't that a double whammy?
Being that this has to be PG-13 this is kinda hard. But is there anything that even gets close to Ohio. I mean do you have a reaction at all? Is this something you can work on. Forgive my ignorance on the medical 10% I have just never met a woman I couldn't satisfy. There has to be a way to wind your clock up enough for time to carry you to Ohio.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
? Would it be a deal breaker?
