View Poll Results: Should people settle in their relationships
|
yes
|
  
|
1 |
6.67% |
no
|
  
|
11 |
73.33% |
sometimes
|
  
|
3 |
20.00% |

07-01-2009, 09:17 AM
|
|
|
352 posts, read 530,783 times
Reputation: 76
|
|
Do you believe that people should settle for someone they may not be entirely interested in when they suffer constant rejection from members of the opposite gender?
|

07-01-2009, 09:18 AM
|
|
|
5,274 posts, read 13,939,293 times
Reputation: 5873
|
|
No.
There's no substitution for quality.
|

07-01-2009, 09:30 AM
|
|
|
Location: Ohio
751 posts, read 1,611,651 times
Reputation: 667
|
|
No I think anyone should just settle.
|

07-01-2009, 09:36 AM
|
|
|
7,101 posts, read 26,389,240 times
Reputation: 7436
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nero777
Do you believe that people should settle for someone they may not be entirely interested in when they suffer constant rejection from members of the opposite gender?
|
No. A better question would be to ask yourself if you need someone of the opposite gender bad enough to settle for someone less interesting.
And try to figure out why there is "constant rejection" from others. Perhaps, the person is trying too hard and makes the others uncomfortabel.
If all a person needs is someone to share the bed, or bring home a paycheck, then certainly, settle for whatever you can get and count yourself lucky. I just don't happen to think that, "someone" else is that important.
A lot of people are interesting, but only after you get to know them. They are worth sticking around for.
|

07-01-2009, 09:43 AM
|
|
|
Location: The Hall of Justice
25,906 posts, read 41,002,800 times
Reputation: 42719
|
|
That's not a yes or no question. Should a person be with someone who is cruel, a cheat or a thief because it's better than being lonely? No. Should a person be realistic that dating a supermodel is highly unlikely and look for more normal people? Yes.
|

07-01-2009, 09:54 AM
|
|
|
Location: Hot Springs, AR
5,612 posts, read 14,593,928 times
Reputation: 3784
|
|
There is no such thing as being entirely interested in anyone. The more you get to know someone, you are bound to find out something about them that you don't like. The trick is for the things you like and are interested in to outweigh those things that would not interest you.
|

07-01-2009, 02:59 PM
|
|
|
Location: Houston, TX
17,030 posts, read 29,663,970 times
Reputation: 16244
|
|
Thsi has been discussed on other threads, but no one is perfect. But if you decide to settle because you can't find anything better, thats not so good.
|

07-01-2009, 03:07 PM
|
|
|
Location: Omaha
2,716 posts, read 6,667,222 times
Reputation: 1230
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nero777
Do you believe that people should settle for someone they may not be entirely interested in when they suffer constant rejection from members of the opposite gender?
|
Hell no, you never just "settle".
|

07-01-2009, 04:38 PM
|
|
|
Location: Rockland County New York
2,984 posts, read 5,654,731 times
Reputation: 1298
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nero777
Do you believe that people should settle for someone they may not be entirely interested in when they suffer constant rejection from members of the opposite gender?
|
Instead of settling I think a person should develop a better self esteem. Why would any one want to settle for anything less than true love?
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|