|

11-01-2007, 05:42 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
72 posts, read 31,377 times
Reputation: 22
|
|
What moral attitude should we take toward Globalism?
How do I change my format to a format that this forum will accept?]
|
|

11-01-2007, 05:54 AM
|
|
Dwarka Citizen ॐ
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The world, where will fate take me this time?
2,960 posts, read 2,744,323 times
Reputation: 947
|
|
|
If I understood your question properly my reply is the following.
We should have an open mind towards it and we should be preparing ourselves for a more global society.
We should develop a higher tolerance for other culture's ideas, beliefs and habits.
Love is the most powerful force in the universe, it is the only way to really influence people if we strive to love and accept others will follow our example and will continue loving others too, that's the only way globalism will work.
And we have to start from ourselves, are we loving unconditionally?
|
|

11-01-2007, 08:59 AM
|
|
G.I. Jesus
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Netherlands
7,750 posts, read 3,556,683 times
Reputation: 1141
|
|
What Christian religion was in the medieval century, so is globalism in our century.
It aggressively tries to convert non-believers to a world-economy.
 What many believers of globalism do not realise yet, is that their political and economical theories are not fully compatible with reality.
|
|

11-01-2007, 09:48 AM
|
|
Faraway Looker
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
2,949 posts, read 1,729,870 times
Reputation: 1739
|
|
|
Globalism itself is not a bad thing. We live in a global community despite our many borders and we should not ignore that.
We should adjust laws accordingly so that global political and economic theories ARE compatible with reality.
|
|

11-01-2007, 10:33 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
2,360 posts
Reputation: 864
|
|
|
It's absurd to call globalization a religion. It's like calling the Industrial Revolution a "religion." It's a change in society that is driven by technology.
RE: What moral attitude should we take toward Globalism (Globalization)?
UPS ships to countries all over the world. I can stay up all night on the east coast, and trade stocks on a stock exchange in Hong Kong. Right now, the standard of living is rising for poor people across the world. Countries along the Pacific Rim are organizing international agreements for sustainable fisheries. Ideas are now more freely shared between people on other sides of the planet. These are all results of globalization that could easily be seen as "morally good."
At the same time, China's increased industrial output is polluting their country, and the world. Pets (And possibly people) have died due to unsafe products from newly "globalized" countries. China's increased global reach raises moral questions about freedom of the press and religion. Islamic terrorists are more able to kill innocent people. American "McDonalds" culture is spreading to countries who may not want it. These are all results of globalization that could easily be seen as "morally bad."
So, like most things, I think globalization is morally ambiguous.
|
|

11-01-2007, 10:36 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
350 posts, read 283,780 times
Reputation: 180
|
|
|
Based on the question I think of the saying, "Think globally, act locally"
|
|

11-01-2007, 11:01 AM
|
|
I have more questions than answers
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ARK-KIN-SAW
3,400 posts, read 2,406,963 times
Reputation: 1303
|
|
|
the more "global" we get as a nation, IMHO will require a reduction in our sovernity as a nation. Do we really want or need other countries troops to help protect the US? Im really asking the question? and how much of others countries "religions" will we have to open up too?
|
|

11-01-2007, 11:29 AM
|
|
Faraway Looker
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
2,949 posts, read 1,729,870 times
Reputation: 1739
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by arguy1973
the more "global" we get as a nation, IMHO will require a reduction in our sovernity as a nation. Do we really want or need other countries troops to help protect the US? Im really asking the question? and how much of others countries "religions" will we have to open up too?
|
We are already supposed to be opened up to ALL religions in the US.
And those who respect the Constitution are.
|
|

11-01-2007, 11:35 AM
|
|
I have more questions than answers
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ARK-KIN-SAW
3,400 posts, read 2,406,963 times
Reputation: 1303
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by b. frank
We are already supposed to be opened up to ALL religions in the US.
And those who respect the Constitution are.
|
not exactly what I meant..
the more countries give up their sovernity, the more the push for a global, one world religion there will be. there is already many that have tried to "water down" their own beliefs to try to accomidate a more worldy view.
|
|

11-01-2007, 11:45 AM
|
|
Faraway Looker
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
2,949 posts, read 1,729,870 times
Reputation: 1739
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by arguy1973
not exactly what I meant..
the more countries give up their sovernity, the more the push for a global, one world religion there will be. there is already many that have tried to "water down" their own beliefs to try to accomidate a more worldy view.
|
OK - I see. But Globalism is not a total merging of all nations, just an open interaction among them.
I personally don't care about one world religion - as long as I'm free to ignore it along with all of the existing ones.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|