Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-22-2010, 03:07 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,040,586 times
Reputation: 15038

Advertisements

A lot has been written in recent weeks about moral absolutism, and transcendent laws, but it is interesting to note, the obvious, Protestantism very birth was the result of moral relativism. More to the point, the desire of one King, Henry VIII, to rid himself of an inconvenient marriage.

I suppose I could recount the moral relativism of the Catholic Church itself, but that would require a thread of voluminous proportions. Suffice it to say, that for good and for ill (from a Christian perspective) the hundreds of Protestant denominations, clearly demonstrate that moral absolutism and transcendent law is hardly achievable even within the Christian community even as exemplified by the schism within the Anglican and Episcopal Churches over issues regarding homosexuality or the role of women in the churches pastoral leadership.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-22-2010, 04:03 PM
 
Location: Free State of Texas
20,440 posts, read 12,783,448 times
Reputation: 2497
Just because men can't agree doesn't mean God is not morally absolute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 04:05 PM
 
Location: East Coast U.S.
1,513 posts, read 1,624,286 times
Reputation: 106
Disagreements over moral absolutes would not equate to an absence of moral absolutes.

Is it wrong to lie?

If there is a Transcendent Being and this Transcendent Being establishes an edict against lying, then, it naturally follows that lying is wrong no matter who disagrees.

If there is no Transcendent Being then it naturally follows that there can be no Transcendent Law and all morality logically becomes relative.

"If there is no God, all things are permissible."

Are certain things just plain wrong or, are certain things wrong just because the atheist says they're wrong?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 04:10 PM
 
Location: Free State of Texas
20,440 posts, read 12,783,448 times
Reputation: 2497
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigetmax24 View Post
Disagreements over moral absolutes would not equate to an absence of moral absolutes.

Is it wrong to lie?

If there is a Transcendent Being and this Transcendent Being establishes an edict against lying, then, it naturally follows that lying is wrong no matter who disagrees.

If there is no Transcendent Being then it naturally follows that there can be no Transcendent Law and all morality logically becomes relative.

"If there is no God, all things are permissible."

Are certain things just plain wrong or, are certain things wrong just because the atheist says they're wrong?
I'm reading (for the second time) C.S. Lewis' "Mere Christianity". I just finished the part where he makes your point exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 04:20 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,040,586 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmiej View Post
Just because men can't agree doesn't mean God is not morally absolute.
A moral absolute, by definition, isn't up for interpretation. Either it is absolute or it is dependent upon interpretation, i.e., relative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Free State of Texas
20,440 posts, read 12,783,448 times
Reputation: 2497
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
A moral absolute, by definition, isn't up for interpretation. Either it is absolute or it is dependent upon interpretation, i.e., relative.
God would agree with you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 04:27 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,040,586 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigetmax24 View Post
Disagreements over moral absolutes would not equate to an absence of moral absolutes.
Welcome back.

Well to ask a question that you are oft to ask, then who decides which of those moral absolutes is absolutely correct?

Quote:
Is it wrong to lie?
No, but that isn't one of your god's absolutes, nor is it relevant to the thread since, as an atheist and a unbeliever in moral absolutes, my opinion is of no import.

Quote:
If there is a Transcendent Being and this Transcendent Being establishes an edict against lying, then, it naturally follows that lying is wrong no matter who disagrees.
Apparently there is quite a bit of disagreement about what this transcendent being as dictated. So, who amongst the holy gets to decide?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 06:17 PM
 
1,743 posts, read 2,159,494 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmiej View Post
God would agree with you.

Not your Bible god. His morals change from one chapter of his "holy word" to the next.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 06:47 PM
 
1,743 posts, read 2,159,494 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigetmax24 View Post
Disagreements over moral absolutes would not equate to an absence of moral absolutes.

Is it wrong to lie?

If there is a Transcendent Being and this Transcendent Being establishes an edict against lying, then, it naturally follows that lying is wrong no matter who disagrees.

If there is no Transcendent Being then it naturally follows that there can be no Transcendent Law and all morality logically becomes relative.
Yeah, so it's too bad that no transcendent being has ever made itself known or given any edicts to humanity, huh?



Quote:
"If there is no God, all things are permissible."
Hmm. Actually it's entirely possible that all things are permissible even if there IS a God
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 08:38 PM
 
Location: Free State of Texas
20,440 posts, read 12,783,448 times
Reputation: 2497
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuixoticHobbit View Post



Hmm. Actually it's entirely possible that all things are permissible even if there IS a God
Is it OK if someone steals $500 from you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top