Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-05-2011, 11:40 AM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,088 posts, read 20,717,984 times
Reputation: 5930

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr5150 View Post
And what evidence would that be?

I keep asking that question. No one has an answer.
Let's try to give you one.

There is no God. Evidence is that there is no valid spoor of God. Faith - healings are dubious, spirit messages, NED's and predictions are doubtful, dodgy and fall flat. Historically events do not show anything but the forces of humanity. Miracles are so much tosh. The best attested one, Fatima, is demonstrably fraudulent.

The problem of evil puts the tin lid on the matter - the God of Christian theology is a contradiction in terms and cannot be possible.

Genesis is contradicted by the evidence. Exodus has no good support and is chronologically impossible, being placed after the establishment of Philistia which was supposedly after the Jews invaded Canaan. In fact evidence is that the jews grew (like Rome) on site and originally worshipped a lot of gods of which YHWH and his wife were only two.

The battles are historical or probably so but some the Israelites won, some they lost. No sign of the hand of God there. The predictions are evidently written after the event - probably all around the time of the Maccabean revolt since the prophecies Daniel and Tyre are dodgy as to Babylon (supposedly when they were written) but get their Greek material right. E.g the Alexandrian causeway and the Seleucid/Ptolemaic war but are after that either vague or wrong. Tyre was soon flourishing again. Similar is the prophecy of Babylon which prospered even under the Greeks.

Having disposed of the OT, the New T is a Christian fabrication based on the Jewish - based gentile - friendly teachings of Paul. He believed that Jesus was man, not God and a suffering obedient servant of God, not God incarnate. Since he got his info from the apostles who had made the best of a bad job of Jesus' failed messianic mission by supposing that his spirit had ascended and would soon return to finish the job, Paul worked out a theory involving Jesus as sacrifice to redeem Adam's disobedience.

Thus the gospels, going a bit further in taking the human animated by the spirit of God which we see even in John, were not yet at the stage of identifying Jesus AS God which theology was invented later.

Essentially, we can see the progression of theology from Paul as the Gospel - writers re-created God in his own image and cast the Jews (who had rejected Paul's theology) as the villains. The prophecies of Jesus are flimsy and have been used to construct the Jesus story in any case. Example the Bethlehem story was invented to fulfill scripture (which historically, Jesus didn't) The two differing accounts of Judas' death are based on mistranslated and out of context OT passages. Once you have seen the trick it's clear how the Jesus story was padded out with prophecy - the crucifixion even having Jesus quoting Psalms and John rather uncommonly lifting the spear (which the synoptics know nothing of) and bone - breaking out of context from Isaiah.

The OT is no evidence for God and Science is evidence against.

The New T is no evidence for Gos and history is evidence against.

Logically, theologically and practically, there is no sound evidence for God and plenty of evidence against.

That should be enough for most people, but Faith of course demands that reason and evidence should be subverted to religious belief.

That's just an overview from my own stance, of course. The discussion is a huge one but I can say that the Genesis and Nativity discussion is done and lost to Theism. Exodus, Daniel, the Galilean material and pretty much all the parables and prophecies have received a good kicking, though I have to say that our Theist pal Campbell 34 is a redoubtable fighter for Crystal skulls and holes in the poles.

If you are so minded, stick around and we can run through some of the evidences, reasons and kickings alluded to above. It's always worth -while giving them an airing.

Last edited by TRANSPONDER; 07-05-2011 at 11:57 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-05-2011, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Sierra Nevada Land, CA
9,455 posts, read 12,545,216 times
Reputation: 16453
OK I'll take one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AREQUIPA View Post
Let's try to give you one.


The problem of evil puts the tin lid on the matter - the God of Christian theology is a contradiction in terms and cannot be possible.
The lid? God allows and/or causes evil. It says as much in the Bible. Nowhere is it written that God is all nice and loving.

So what does it mean? It means God works in ways that we either don't understand or agree with. It is not a proof of anything beyond that God behaves in ways that we find objectionable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2011, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Valencia, Spain
16,155 posts, read 12,857,175 times
Reputation: 2881
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr5150 View Post
Nowhere is it written that God is all nice and loving.
"And so we know and rely on the love God has for us. God is love"
1 John 4:16
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2011, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Sierra Nevada Land, CA
9,455 posts, read 12,545,216 times
Reputation: 16453
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
"And so we know and rely on the love God has for us. God is love"
1 John 4:16
John 3:36 Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on them.

Not all nice and loving, as it is written.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2011, 05:43 PM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,088 posts, read 20,717,984 times
Reputation: 5930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr5150 View Post
OK I'll take one.The lid? God allows and/or causes evil. It says as much in the Bible. Nowhere is it written that God is all nice and loving.

So what does it mean? It means God works in ways that we either don't understand or agree with. It is not a proof of anything beyond that God behaves in ways that we find objectionable.
That is not a new argument. However, it puts the tin lid - as I say - on the Christian idea that God is comfortably nice. It becomes a very uncomfortable god. It also puts the tin lid on the idea that we can find the spoor of god in the workings of the world since God permits or even does evil. If there was no god - how would it be different?

Together with those doubts about the veracity of the Bible it puts the tin lid - as I say - on any sound evidence FOR God as opposed to some pretty telling evidence against.

Of course I am not so foolish as to suppose that this is going to persuade the believer. All I'm doing to give you a snapshot of the evidential case this particular atheist has as to why the Biblical and christian God is unbelievable, which is what you asked for.

It's just the beginning of the debate not the end of course. The debate has been going on for a long time. But I'm seeing less of the old arguments being used as we have the measure of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2011, 06:13 PM
 
Location: East Coast U.S.
1,513 posts, read 1,624,420 times
Reputation: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr5150 View Post
OK I'll take one.The lid? God allows and/or causes evil. It says as much in the Bible. Nowhere is it written that God is all nice and loving.
God causes evil? ...and the Bible confirms this? It seems to me that there is a vast difference between God allowing evil and God causing evil.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AREQUIPA View Post
The problem of evil puts the tin lid on the matter - the God of Christian theology is a contradiction in terms and cannot be possible.
How does one acknowledge the presence of evil without also acknowledging the existence of good? If "there is no God," from whence do good and evil come?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2011, 07:18 PM
 
4,529 posts, read 5,137,790 times
Reputation: 4098
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigetmax24 View Post
God causes evil? ...and the Bible confirms this? It seems to me that there is a vast difference between God allowing evil and God causing evil.



How does one acknowledge the presence of evil without also acknowledging the existence of good? If "there is no God," from whence do good and evil come?

That are concepts that come from mankind. Both good and evil are absent in nature. We are the cause of both, nothing else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2011, 07:36 PM
 
63,808 posts, read 40,077,272 times
Reputation: 7871
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebnllnb View Post
That are concepts that come from mankind. Both good and evil are absent in nature. We are the cause of both, nothing else.
In an oddly ignorant philosophical way this is quite true. We are the only creature in nature capable of making such distinctions and caring about them. Therein lies our special power and importance to the universal consciousness (God).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2011, 09:27 AM
 
4,529 posts, read 5,137,790 times
Reputation: 4098
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticPhD View Post
In an oddly ignorant philosophical way this is quite true. We are the only creature in nature capable of making such distinctions and caring about them. Therein lies our special power and importance to the universal consciousness (God).

universal consciousness (God) There is no such thing. As much as you wish it to be so. Because mankind has the ability to commit acts of pure selfishness (evil) or pure selflessness (good) but god it does not make, or a "universal consciousness" which is a laughable concept.

And mystic you can be as condescending and self important as you like. It does nothing to further your ideology. It only serves to make you seem like a pompous jack---.

Last edited by mikebnllnb; 07-06-2011 at 10:31 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2011, 10:50 AM
 
2,031 posts, read 2,987,934 times
Reputation: 1379
Default More evidence that supports "Gone With The Wind"

American Civil War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Georgia (U.S. state) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reconstruction Era of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See? There really was a Civil War, a place called Georgia, and a period called Reconstruction!

What more proof do you need that Scarlett O'Hara really lived, and that Rhett Butlet really didn't give a damn?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top