U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-26-2011, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
29,462 posts, read 28,626,451 times
Reputation: 11877

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gsoboi78 View Post
Do some actual researching instead of just making statement based on your beliefs.
I don't have to, as you have posted all kinds of things that you call evidence.
Sorry but it is not evidence. Many prominent scientists consider extraterrestrial life to be plausible, but the scientific community does not currently recognize any verifiable evidence of such life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2011, 08:01 PM
 
Location: Rutherfordton,NC
9,344 posts, read 6,650,080 times
Reputation: 7273
Truth is in the eye of the beholder. To be honest we won't know what is or isn't true untill we are 6Ft under.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 09:20 PM
 
5,677 posts, read 8,827,116 times
Reputation: 3940
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsoboi78 View Post
We have all heard of the Adam and Eve story in the book of Genesis in the Holy Bible. Most Christians accept that story as the beginning of mankind. But what most people don't realize is that the story of our beginnings in the Holy Bible was based off a more ancient text from the Ancient Sumerians. Sumer was were modern day Iraq is located. The Sumerian text speaks of our beginnings and even speaks of the great flood. While much of the book of Genesis is a carbon copy of the Sumerian text, there is one part that is not so alike. In the bible God created man. In the Sumerian text, the Anunnaki created humans. Anunnaki means those who from heaven came to earth. Today we would call them extraterrestrials. According to the Sumerian text, the Anunnaki created us by mixing their DNA with the DNA of early apes. The result was the creation of homo sapiens. Like in the Bible, the Sumerian text speaks of the Tree of Life and it is depicted on Sumerian clay tablets with entwined snakes which looks exactly like DNA. Variations of that symbol is used in the medical field today. There is one verse in the book of Genesis that is often overlooked. It says "Let US create man in OUR own image" That suggests that more than one created man.

The Sumerian text also says the Anunnaki taught mankind about the stars, how to make weapons, agriculture, ect. Biblical text (the Book of Enoch) says fallen angels taught man these things. The Bible even says that these fallen angels came to earth and mated with human women and created an offspring called the Nephilim or giants. The Bible and Sumerian text both speak of beings coming to earth and physically interacting with humans. So the question is which version of our creation is the truth? When ever you want to find the truth about something you go to the original source. In this case its the ancient Sumerian text. The Sumerian text was the foundation of the Holy Bible. Some where along the line, the creation story changed. Are these beings that came to earth in the past still coming today? More than likely. We call them extraterrestrial/UFOs. Some ET's today are described as human looking with paper white skin and hair. Noah's grandfather Enoch describes the angels as having snow white skin and hair. This truth about UFOs could be the main reason why it is being covered up. It would rock the foundation of the world's great religions. It makes you wonder about some of the reasons the U.S. invaded Iraq. Maybe our government was trying to seek more ancient knowledge. Its interesting that the U.S. went through great lengths to protect museums in Iraq.
I've posted this video MANY times before, but it applies to this thread (and will save you tons of time trying to explain your position on this issue). For those who are interested and have the time, the following video explains exactly why the OP feels the way how he does.


Lloyd Pye - Everything you know is wrong - YouTube

Here is an update that I found on Lloyd Pye's "pet project" (The Star Child skull).


Starchild Skull- The SHOCKING DNA Results Are In....WATCH THIS! *HD* - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 09:41 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
29,462 posts, read 28,626,451 times
Reputation: 11877
Star child skull, yeah right. That was debunked.
Tests conducted utilizing mtDNA recovered from the skull have established it as human. Experts believe it to be the skull of a child who died as a result of known genetic or congenital abnormalities, such as congenital hydrocephalus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
12,288 posts, read 17,098,977 times
Reputation: 12887
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Star child skull, yeah right. That was debunked.
Tests conducted utilizing mtDNA recovered from the skull have established it as human. Experts believe it to be the skull of a child who died as a result of known genetic or congenital abnormalities, such as congenital hydrocephalus.
...which is an extraterrestrial disease cased by alien cranial implants. They didn't have tinfoil back then to protect themselves from it, you see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 09:51 PM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
12,288 posts, read 17,098,977 times
Reputation: 12887
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsoboi78 View Post
According to some who claimed to have been "briefed" the human race is a grand experiment and that our DNA was gradually altered over time by beings not from earth. We call them extraterrestrials.


The Hebrew Bible written some 3,000 years after the Sumer wrote their creation story said that the "Elohim" said "Let us make man in our own image" Elohim is a grammatically singular or plural noun for "god" or "gods". The Elohim are the same as those described by the Sumer as the Annunaki (those who came to earth from heaven). Just what if two great major religions were started (Judaism & Christianity) because of a simple misinterpretation from plural to singular? The original hebrew Bible says Elohim created man. Elohim could be God or gods. When it was translated, somebody could have easily misinterpreted and said God with a capital G.

In Christian art angels are depicted as having wings on their backs. They don't literally have wings. They are symbolic for their ability to fly. There are scientific explanations as to how they fly and they fly in vehicles called UFOs. In Christianity angels=extraterrestrials and Sumer gods=extraterrestrials.
Um, one point. If someone is in a high enough place to be briefed on aliens, you probably aren't gonna hear them talk about it at at UFO convention or cheesy Discovery Channel edutainment program. Just sayin'...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 10:13 PM
 
5,677 posts, read 8,827,116 times
Reputation: 3940
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Star child skull, yeah right. That was debunked.
Tests conducted utilizing mtDNA recovered from the skull have established it as human. Experts believe it to be the skull of a child who died as a result of known genetic or congenital abnormalities, such as congenital hydrocephalus.
In 2004 the Starchild Skull was examined by respected craniofacial surgeon Dr. Ted Robinson, in consultation with ten other specialists with the goal of identifying a medical condition that could explain the skull[10]. In their discussion on Hydrocephaly, Dr David Hodges, a radiologist, confirmed that the suture lines were open and growing at the time of death, and could find no evidence of widening or other abnormality of the cranial sutures[11]. Dr. Bachynsky, also a radiologist, found no signs of erosion on the internal surfaces of the skull, ruling out fluid between the brain and skull, and supported Dr. Robinson's conclusion that the Starchild was not Hydrocephalic
Is the Starchild Skull a Hydrocephalic?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 10:25 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
29,462 posts, read 28,626,451 times
Reputation: 11877
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbancharlotte View Post
In 2004 the Starchild Skull was examined by respected craniofacial surgeon Dr. Ted Robinson, in consultation with ten other specialists with the goal of identifying a medical condition that could explain the skull[10]. In their discussion on Hydrocephaly, Dr David Hodges, a radiologist, confirmed that the suture lines were open and growing at the time of death, and could find no evidence of widening or other abnormality of the cranial sutures[11]. Dr. Bachynsky, also a radiologist, found no signs of erosion on the internal surfaces of the skull, ruling out fluid between the brain and skull, and supported Dr. Robinson's conclusion that the Starchild was not Hydrocephalic
Is the Starchild Skull a Hydrocephalic?
Right, then it must have been some other abnormality...The DNA test confirms that the skull is human....We have had this discussion before, so I really see no point in having it again. You will continue to believe what you want in spite of the lack of evidence, and you will continue to dismiss any evidence that refutes what you WANT to believe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 10:30 PM
 
Location: Somewhere out there
9,616 posts, read 10,439,615 times
Reputation: 3702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asheville Native View Post
You start off making stuff up, thus I have to read no further than your first falsehood. I was unaware that believing in fairy tales gives you license to make up more fairy tales.

In the US only 40% of the people believe in the creation fairy tale, and we are on the stupid end of the scale.

In almost every other industrialized country the percentage is 20% or less.

When you start a premise based on falsehoods, the rest is summarily dismissed as more of the same.

Here is the scale and the US is clearly on the stupid end.
Despite my growing understanding of the utter naiveté of the American public, this graph still stunned me, Asheville Thanks, but wow! Wish I hadn't seen this one: it's humiliating and embarrassing. But then again, so is this poster's loonoid premise.

Hmmm... it's got to be our stupid education system, coupled with our keen interest in special deals on McDonald's french fries as a badge of accomplishment, huh?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gsoboi78 View Post
again...Have you ever wondered why 223 genes in the human genome dont show up anywhere in ANY of our predecessors? Either these genes magically appeared in our DNA or they are extraterrestrial.
1) A completely assumptive conclusion on your part. 2) 223 out of how many, gsoboi? What's the total number of gene pairs in the human genome again? You tell me please. No? OK then, I'll tell you: it's 3 billion+, making your little tiny number of seemingly unassigned genes (which I personally doubt, since they may well just be left-overs from a previous iteration or species difference, simply not in use right now. to asume they are alien-sourced as the ONLY option? Wow. Just wow! )

Your number is, indeed, a rather unimportant percentage. In fact, it's also difficult to write it down in a manner that most readers would be able to comprehend. 223/3,000,000,000*100 = percentage; = (well, my calculator wont' tell me right off! Wait: OK: there it is, in engineering terms: 7.43 X 10 to the minus 7 percentage. Hmmm : real significant!).

Quote:
Originally Posted by gsoboi78 View Post
Then why are scientist trying to find the missing link?
Boy, are you ever stuck in the late '60s, huh? What Missing Link are we supposedly searching for? We don't need one: that is an old and now discarded concept used long before the advent of DNA genome mapping. Where-ever did you conclude that we're looking for that any more? On some ancient-info Christian web site you just gladly read and blindly accept??

Got to be it: a reliance on totally debunked old stuff, whose authors are incapable of "sussing" beyond the most technically outdated info on the planet. to be part of a herd of uninformed anti-science apologists. Typical. Try to read a bit and upgrade, OK gsoboi??

I mean, you don't want to look completely illiterate, do you?

RE: gsoboi's use of unexamined info, or of accusing us of simply making it up for dramatic effect. His amazing quote:

Quote:
Originally Posted by gsoboi78
"Do some actual researching instead of just making statement based on your beliefs."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sickman View Post
You're saying this? Really?
This guy's proven himself to be completely unworthy of, or unprepared for, continued debate on his own OP topic! Time to move on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2011, 10:42 PM
 
5,677 posts, read 8,827,116 times
Reputation: 3940
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Right, then it must have been some other abnormality.
For once we agree. It was "some 'other' abnormality".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2017, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top