U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 07:13 PM
 
Location: by my computer
40 posts, read 10,220 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper 88 View Post
So What is so wrong with polygamy so long as it is between consenting adults? What about it warrants it to be considered a crime? Are you aware that many polygamist relationships have a higher survival rate then monogamous ones? Polygamy is also found amongst many figuers in the Bible.

Is there anybody who approves of gay marriage but opposes polygamy? If so, how did you arrive at that conclusion?

What is so wrong with polygamy and who does it hurt?
There is nothing wrong with this as long as the adult partners are consenting. It would take certain adaptations to form a complete relationship with multiple partners. If these partners were compatible there would be no difference after getting used to the concept of sharing life fully with more than one person. It should not be illegal just as same sex marriage should be accepted so should polygamy.
Government should stay out of relationships, all of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 04-13-2012, 07:17 PM
 
Location: Philippines
449 posts, read 183,800 times
Reputation: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by katiegrrl0 View Post
Government should stay out of relationships, all of them.
After reading your post, I couldn't help but think of Utah. Interesting that the Government would not accept Utah's request for admission into the Union until the Utah state government changed its marital rules to one spouse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 07:22 PM
 
Location: by my computer
40 posts, read 10,220 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallisdj View Post
After reading your post, I couldn't help but think of Utah. Interesting that the Government would not accept Utah's request for admission into the Union until the Utah state government changed its marital rules to one spouse.
I don't understand the need the government has to be in the marriage business.
Marriage or any relationship in a way is a contract between parties and the state needs not involve itself in such contracts.
Why are there benefits given to those that are married? Why is a certain relationship given priority over others? The government is saying that it is not good to be single so we will give you a bonus if you get married. Why is this the case. The government needs to stay out of these and any such relationship. If a person wants to protect their interests draw up a legal contract with the partner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 07:25 PM
 
Location: by my computer
40 posts, read 10,220 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by hljc View Post
What is wrong with a women with five husbands? , or two men and two womens being married as one? .. or a women or man married to a animal of the world ?.... Bazaar ideas, selfish ideas ...how far can ethics go....
Why would it be a bad thing if three women lived together? Why not three men? If relationship is the desire of all the partners it should be no problem to do so.

Ethics are less the problem than perceived morals and convention. This is how relationships have been handled and so they need to remain the same anything else is wrong. LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 07:31 PM
 
Location: Early, TX
4,476 posts, read 958,977 times
Reputation: 1892
Quote:
Originally Posted by katiegrrl0 View Post
It should not be illegal just as same sex marriage should be accepted so should polygamy. Government should stay out of relationships, all of them.
Gay marriage and polygamy being officially accepted in the same way as heterosexual marriage would require at least state government to be involved. This is why the whole concept of legal marriage is retarded in the first place; it's checking in with the powers that be to get their blessing before declaring your love for another to the world. It's actually asking them to be involved.

At any rate, I do think there's at least one considerable difference between gay marriage and polygamy (post #18)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 07:40 PM
 
Location: Florida
596 posts, read 314,680 times
Reputation: 266
Polgyamy is adultery ,,which God opposes ,but if your inclined not to be associated with God albeit His commands or his identifying sinful conditions covered in the word then go for it!

Das
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 07:55 PM
 
Location: by my computer
40 posts, read 10,220 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic 2.0 View Post
Gay marriage and polygamy being officially accepted in the same way as heterosexual marriage would require at least state government to be involved. This is why the whole concept of legal marriage is retarded in the first place; it's checking in with the powers that be to get their blessing before declaring your love for another to the world. It's actually asking them to be involved.

At any rate, I do think there's at least one considerable difference between gay marriage and polygamy (post #18)
I agree that official marriage should be a thing of the past. i thought I made that clear but I guess I didn't.

There is a large different between polygamy and same sex marriage. But the polygamous relationship can very well be same sex. I will look at the quote in post #18.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 08:03 PM
 
Location: by my computer
40 posts, read 10,220 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic 2.0 View Post
While I don't oppose polygamy, I would consider it inherently more risky than a monogamous relationship. It's basic mathematics. More people = more chance there will be trouble. There's at least one more person in the situation who could get hurt emotionally or physically (one more person who could get/transmit an STD).

I'm not saying there aren't monogamous relationships out there which are more harmful to those involved than some cases of polygamy. Just that the idea itself is inherently more dangerous, though perhaps not much. I wouldn't consider gay marriage a relationship in which there is inherently more risk than heterosexual marriage.

But I don't think of legal marriage as anything special in the first place. Whether the law or the state "officially" recognizes your marriage or not, you're married if you're in a committed relationship, say I.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic 2.0 View Post
Gay marriage and polygamy being officially accepted in the same way as heterosexual marriage would require at least state government to be involved. This is why the whole concept of legal marriage is retarded in the first place; it's checking in with the powers that be to get their blessing before declaring your love for another to the world. It's actually asking them to be involved.

At any rate, I do think there's at least one considerable difference between gay marriage and polygamy (post #18)
A monogamous relationship has it's advantage as it is less complex. Living in a household of three or more would certainly add additional difficulties.

I don't so much worry about STD's in lesbian relationships as we are the least risk group. If the partners are faithful to the relationship which we would hope this should not be a problem. If the polygamous relationship is also open then you bring in a larger problem.

I would want the relationship to be closed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 08:04 PM
 
Location: by my computer
40 posts, read 10,220 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by DASULAR17 View Post
Polgyamy is adultery ,,which God opposes ,but if your inclined not to be associated with God albeit His commands or his identifying sinful conditions covered in the word then go for it!

Das
If you believe in god than this would not be a relationship for you. You would not like my current same sex marriage either. I am not concern about such things as the gods of others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-13-2012, 08:10 PM
 
340 posts, read 130,999 times
Reputation: 407
I see nothing wrong with homosexuality or polygamy. Religion or not for the polygamy. I'm a Christian but I also believe what happens between consenting adults is no ones business. People should be free to love as they want & I don't think either are unhealthy as long as all parties are in agreement. I also don't think it's damaging to kids, I've seen plenty of hetero couples that screwed up their kids so it's not a sexual preference that is a factor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:23 PM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top