Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-07-2013, 06:40 PM
 
Location: City-Data Forum
7,943 posts, read 6,066,770 times
Reputation: 1359

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaznjohn View Post
To recap:

According to Vizio,

1. Relatively modern indentured servants were called slaves in the OT.
2. Slaves in the OT were not the same as the slaves in the relatively modern times because they were indentured servants.

Got it.
So can still coalesce those two.

In his head (since we know him as "Vizio the LMAO historian") he believes he must support his idol with every degree of gymnastics. What he has forced himself to believe is that there was no such thing as "owning people as property and removing all their (dare I say it) 'God-given' rights" back in the Iron Ages.

It was either slavery or dungeon prison (or perhaps death) for debters buddy Vizio.
Jesus and Paul of the Iron age, were undeniably immoral, since they thought "benevolent" slavery was civil and necessary.

Vizio, to support his inky idol, does not believe in inalienable human rights. He believes human rights are alienable when you owe money, and when his YHWH, commands to alienate them. And if he doesn't, then I hope he settles his cognitive dissonance in one of the good ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-07-2013, 06:45 PM
 
5,190 posts, read 4,838,858 times
Reputation: 1115
It would be much easier and honest, if Christians were to just come out and say:

'Yes, slavery is permissable because the Bible says so'

at least we would all know where we stood then, lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 07:08 PM
 
864 posts, read 871,208 times
Reputation: 258
Quote:
So were they then allowed to leave free after they had paid their debts?

And how about the slaves that were forced into it?
Slaves automatically went free the sabbatical year called shmita.
Slaves could not be forced into slavery. Prisoners of war ended up slaves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 07:31 PM
 
5,190 posts, read 4,838,858 times
Reputation: 1115
A prisoner of war is still forced.

And how about children whose parents had sold them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 10:11 PM
 
864 posts, read 871,208 times
Reputation: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenneth-Kaunda View Post
A prisoner of war is still forced.

And how about children whose parents had sold them?
A prisoner of war is a prisoner of war. War has its risks. Being killed is one of them, another is capture. Laws of war are different than civilian law.

Only a prepubescent girl could be sold into slavery and she went free as soon as she turned twelve.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 10:19 PM
 
Location: Valencia, Spain
16,155 posts, read 12,858,876 times
Reputation: 2881
Quote:
Originally Posted by iwishiwerethin View Post
A prisoner of war is a prisoner of war. War has its risks. Being killed is one of them, another is capture. Laws of war are different than civilian law.
You can spin and waffle all you want but it isn't going to alter the fact that your Bible and your man-god Jesus condones slavery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 10:23 PM
 
5,190 posts, read 4,838,858 times
Reputation: 1115
Quote:
Originally Posted by iwishiwerethin View Post
Only a prepubescent girl could be sold into slavery and she went free as soon as she turned twelve.
ok, right, now I see - it's ok for a child to be sold into slavery cos' they like, get free once they turn 12.

Nice
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 10:47 PM
 
Location: City-Data Forum
7,943 posts, read 6,066,770 times
Reputation: 1359
Quote:
Originally Posted by iwishiwerethin View Post
Slaves automatically went free the sabbatical year called shmita.
Slaves could not be forced into slavery. Prisoners of war ended up slaves.
False, as expected from a Christian or someone else similarly ill-informed.

Only slaves who were Jews and owned by Jews would be set free for fullfilment of debt payment.
unless they married while slaves, in which case they would stay slaves, even though Jew, forever.

Foreign slaves could of course be kept forever also, whether they married a Jewish slavewomen (in which case she would be forever enslaved) or anyone else.

Debters, the poor, prisoners of war, people sold into slavery by their parents, prisoners of inquisitions, prisoners of genocide attempts, prisoners of conquest campaigns, victims of famine, etc... all of these and more could be FORCED into slavery.

The character in the "good news" short essays named "Jesus," says to beat your slaves severely if they knowingly do not follow your (the owner's) will, and to beat them with a rod moderately (as you would a child) if they didn't know any better. Indeed, those were the laws of the land at the time, since the rich people had control

Beating a slave for not following your orders is called "forcing them into slavery"

Shmita - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't know how they enforced or followed this observance of forgiving all debts on the seventh year, it looks like according to Deutoronomy, they left it up to the people, who would of course hardly follow such a religious suggestion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2013, 10:50 PM
 
Location: City-Data Forum
7,943 posts, read 6,066,770 times
Reputation: 1359
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenneth-Kaunda View Post
ok, right, now I see - it's ok for a child to be sold into slavery cos' they like, get free once they turn 12.

Nice
I think, according to Paul, what they would have gotten was the Ability to BUY their human rights back, once they turned 12 and could pay for their worth and all they cost/owed their masters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 01:02 AM
 
Location: Valencia, Spain
16,155 posts, read 12,858,876 times
Reputation: 2881
Quote:
Originally Posted by iwishiwerethin View Post
Slaves automatically went free the sabbatical year called shmita.
Slaves could not be forced into slavery. Prisoners of war ended up slaves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuminousTruth View Post
False, as expected from a Christian or someone else similarly ill-informed.
Perhaps they think we are too ignorant to see through their attempt to bamboozle us!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:07 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top