Once those "pro-lifers" take responsibility for the babies to grow properly into adulthood, I'll be all for not trusting women to do what's right for them and the cells that grow inside them, allowing the "anti-death heroes" to force the women to bear and conceive the unwanted child.
Once anti-abortionists study embryology deeply, I'll be even more glad.
Once they stand up against war and the death-sentence and crime, etc. I will stop thinking they have a deeply rooted emotional tunnel vision.
Such silly religions can't take up full responsibility when they try to cease full worldly power.
The God postulated by "pro-life" Christians hears the silent screams and does nothing, such a postulated God kills some of the babies himself without batting an eye. Where does he choose to send the unbaptized babies? Where would he send the baptized ones if they were killed?
a zygote is one diploid (sperm+egg) cell, no soul enters at this stage, a twin can develop/fuze
an embryo is from 2 cells on to birth, no soul in any individual cell nor isolate-able tissue.
a blastocyst (cells in a mass within a sphere of cells) is from 2 cells to gastroblast
in week 3 beings gastroblast stage as the sphere develops an indentation for the alimentary canal.
a fetus is from 8 weeks to birth, the mass of brain cells has begun developing.
After birth its a breathing baby, no soul enters at this stage either, I think.
Human embryogenesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Roe v Wade remains a good and proper compromise (can't decide to kill a born baby, why kill a fetus after 6 long months?)
releasing "your" growing diploid mass before the first trimester should be allowable.
By second trimester let the more local people decide how to punish and prosecute women who think they need/want an abortion w/o it being a rape or incest, etc.