Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-17-2014, 02:14 PM
 
3,695 posts, read 11,368,176 times
Reputation: 2651

Advertisements

When Copernicus figured out that the Earth orbits the sun, it wasn't something that was widely believed at first. But as other discoveries and findings confirmed his model people began to understand that it was correct. They didn't have to believe it, they just had to understand it. The earth had always orbited the sun, but we were too scientifically and technologically immature to realize it.

It's the same thing with evolution and the Big Bang, which today's historic discovery has confirmed in a huge way. We evolved and this universe began with an inflationary big bang regardless of whether you or your religion believes in that or not. Science isn't asking you to believe it - it is only showing you the best possible explanation for the evidence at hand, as researched and confirmed by researchers and scientists and students all over the world.

You can choose to follow the experimental path through the observable world that leads to a converging proof of evolution and the big bang in every scientific discipline and come to an understanding of it. You don't have to take anything at face value. You don't have to accept it just because some authority says that you have to. You can do the work yourself, you can see the research, you can follow the reasoning, you can challenge and question it. There is no dogma other than finding out where the evidence leads.

You believe in religions because you have to take their unprovable claims on faith. You understand science because all it presents to you is a model or theory that best fits the available, testable, provable facts.

Last edited by sean98125; 03-17-2014 at 03:16 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-17-2014, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
31,373 posts, read 20,165,320 times
Reputation: 14069
Good point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2014, 02:40 PM
 
Location: Under the Redwoods
3,751 posts, read 7,668,166 times
Reputation: 6116
And yet, so many who 'believe' in science really don't understand it.
I see so many people speak of scientific info as being hard-set facts. But in science there is a lot of theory. Theory based on evidence, and while all evidence points to something in an 'absolute' way, does not mean that it is totally correct.
And then there are the 'laws' and 'truths' in science. Any scientist will tell you that there are no absolutes in science. That the laws and truths are established only on what we have been able to study and test. Scientific laws and truths can and have changed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2014, 03:18 PM
 
3,695 posts, read 11,368,176 times
Reputation: 2651
Of course science has changed. The more information that we have available, the more accurate the models become. And as the models keep converging on the same point the true nature of reality comes into sharper focus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2014, 04:06 PM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,538 posts, read 28,625,446 times
Reputation: 25105
One more thing that science inevitably makes you understand:

Claims about supernatural things are all make-believe and imaginary nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2014, 06:45 PM
 
Location: New Jersey, USA
618 posts, read 540,601 times
Reputation: 217
Quote:
And then there are the 'laws' and 'truths' in science. Any scientist will tell you that there are no absolutes in science. That the laws and truths are established only on what we have been able to study and test. Scientific laws and truths can and have changed.
Hello OwlKaMyst.

Certainly scientific hypotheses are changed all the time. Scientific "laws" are often refined, but rarely discarded wholesale because of the streangth of evidence required for a "theory" to be dubbed a "law." I do not know the criteria for a scientific "truth."

All of this notwithstanding, I'm not sure of the point you are making. Perhaps you are suggesting that some people prefer religion because the beliefs that it offers are more ridged and all-encompassing? While I can see the allure, this doesn't make them any more true.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2014, 09:44 PM
 
6,205 posts, read 7,455,647 times
Reputation: 3563
How can science be right if it changes every week? Scientists of the 19th century believed in things that were later debunked by scientists of the 20 and 21st centuries. We can say with much certainty that 100 years into the future, some of today's theories will be considered obsolete and/or unacceptable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2014, 01:21 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,376,260 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyker View Post
Hello OwlKaMyst.

Certainly scientific hypotheses are changed all the time. Scientific "laws" are often refined, but rarely discarded wholesale because of the streangth of evidence required for a "theory" to be dubbed a "law." I do not know the criteria for a scientific "truth."

All of this notwithstanding, I'm not sure of the point you are making. Perhaps you are suggesting that some people prefer religion because the beliefs that it offers are more ridged and all-encompassing? While I can see the allure, this doesn't make them any more true.

Thanks.
Hi Hyker.

Just to clarify: A scientific Theory, never becomes a Law. Laws describe observations while a Theory explains them.

Here's a good explanation of facts, Laws and Theories in science.

Not Just a Theory
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2014, 05:03 AM
 
Location: New Jersey, USA
618 posts, read 540,601 times
Reputation: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceist View Post
Just to clarify: A scientific Theory, never becomes a Law. Laws describe observations while a Theory explains them.
Hello Ceist.

Yes, poorly phrased on my part, but too late to edit it. My apologies to the reader and to George Ohm, Isaac Newton et. al.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2014, 05:09 AM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,086 posts, read 20,687,859 times
Reputation: 5927
Quote:
Originally Posted by oberon_1 View Post
How can science be right if it changes every week? Scientists of the 19th century believed in things that were later debunked by scientists of the 20 and 21st centuries. We can say with much certainty that 100 years into the future, some of today's theories will be considered obsolete and/or unacceptable.
Can you give one example of an accepted - as-true scientific fact that has been debunked? I don't mean details like circular orbits being discovered to be elliptical or atoms being clouds rather that little solar systems or indeed evolution having a lot of branches rather than the simple direct branches envisaged by Darwin?

Those are refinements, additional information and even stronger confirmation that the basic discovery is right. That is what changes every week - the addition of better information about the detail. I know of nothing that has been debunked and I see no reason why atomic theory, Newton's and Einsteins' Laws of motion and relativity, circulation of the blood, the Heliocentric system and indeed evolution -theory will not be as valid 100 or 1,000 years in the future as they are now.

If you can, let's hear it. If you can't, accept that this 'science is always changing its mind/ getting things wrong' is an ignorant or dishonest attempt to discredit what science reliably knows in hopes to be able to wangle onto the table religious claims that science has pretty much disproven.

P.s there is a lot to ask about why this discussion is even necessary, but let's hear your answer first.

Last edited by TRANSPONDER; 03-18-2014 at 05:23 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top