Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Mitochondrial eve is an interesting part of the history of human origin.
Trace back 100 to 200 thousand years back.
Although the dates are estimated based on life expectancy or molecular clock. Which in itself is very interesting. What if the molecular clock has been altered in variants of time. This could explain why a human could live very long. Say 900 years.
Just like religion all Scientist have motivations. So the outcome of the data is from the observers perception. We still got a lot of hurdles in the Scientific Community. All knowledge today is built upon the founders. And it is subject to change.
I find it interesting that a frame of the universe is 4 forces 4 states of matter, and 4 dimensions. Huh looks familiar ...
The Scientific method is in no way perfect.
Look back at the history of the rotation of the planets and the Sun Revolving around the Earth.
The early Scientist were able to build a model that worked according to there belief.
The fact of the planets revolving around the Sun was accepted eventually. But it was only recently actually observed.
Perception will motivate your beliefs. Those who truly serve God seek the truth.
Mitochondrial eve is an interesting part of the history of human origin.
Trace back 100 to 200 thousand years back.
Although the dates are estimated based on life expectancy or molecular clock. Which in itself is very interesting. What if the molecular clock has been altered in variants of time. This could explain why a human could live very long. Say 900 years.
Mitochondrial eve is an interesting part of the history of human origin.
Trace back 100 to 200 thousand years back.
Although the dates are estimated based on life expectancy or molecular clock. Which in itself is very interesting. What if the molecular clock has been altered in variants of time. This could explain why a human could live very long. Say 900 years.
But it doesn't explain why Hebrews ... and ONLY Hebrews ... seemed to have this exceedingly selective ability to live for many centuries. No other culture or society has any documentation of people living to be 900 years old. Or even 200 years old.
But it doesn't explain why Hebrews ... and ONLY Hebrews ... seemed to have this exceedingly selective ability to live for many centuries. No other culture or society has any documentation of people living to be 900 years old. Or even 200 years old.
God decreed it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by pinacled
Just like religion all Scientist have motivations. So the outcome of the data is from the observers perception. We still got a lot of hurdles in the Scientific Community. All knowledge today is built upon the founders. And it is subject to change.
I find it interesting that a frame of the universe is 4 forces 4 states of matter, and 4 dimensions. Huh looks familiar ...
Duh...Look, your efforts to try to use Mitochondrial eve to prove genesis and the vage thing you heard about the observer changing the result of the experiment, plus of course the usual Creationists stuff about about science having some sort of agenda to discredit the Bible and the back to front argument about science always getting things wrong, is all half assed, pinacled.
The beauty of science is that it will re-evaluate previous views in the light of new information.
Christianity is doing this all the time, slowly, grudgingly, and often causing disagreements, but it tries to claim that it isn't changing at all.
On the other hand, as explained above, since discoveries at the time that science really became experimental, the heliocentric system, the circulation of the blood and deep -time geology - science hasn't really had to change anything it said at all. The new discoveries merely add to the basics of Newton, Copernicus, Hervey, Faraday and Darwin, whose discoveries are just as valid now as they were then.
The Bible on the other hand is falling apart, piece by piece. Genesis and now Exodus does not look true, nor the Conquest, and certainly not the nativity or resurrection. Not the Sermon on the mount, the trial, nor the transfiguration. And I wouldn't trust Acts any further than I could throw it.
It is religion, not science, that is always getting things wrong. But unlike science, it will never admit it.
Last edited by TRANSPONDER; 08-27-2014 at 04:55 AM..
...snip....
The Bible on the other hand is falling apart, piece by piece. Genesis and now Exodus does not look true, nor the Conquest, and certainly not the nativity or resurrection. Not the Sermon on the mount, the trial, nor the transfiguration. And I wouldn't trust Acts any further than I could throw it.
It is religion, not science, that is always getting things wrong. But unlike science, it will never admit it.
The title of the above-linked article says it all: The World's Greatest Creation Scientists.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
