Quote:
Originally Posted by mordant
I can see the difference, and suspect that he can, but that's not his point. Today's jeans are form-fitting, the t-shirts are translucent, and there may or may not be a bra (or much of one) under it. Frankly, today's "Sunday best" as worn to church would have been immodest by the standards of a few generations ago.
I have always said that the problem with the way women dress is that it leaves little or nothing to the imagination. If women REALLY want to be desired then they ought to dress modestly so that there is something remarkable about making love ... some degree of wonder and revelation to it. The way it is now, by the time one has one's first sexual experience it is just so much rutting. Nothing new to see here, let's get it over with. The only appeal that really remains is being able to say you did it, to have that rite of passage and the first hand experience of it. But I suspect that the reaction of many is, "is THAT what all the fuss is about?" Heck, that conclusion arrives soon enough anyway, no need to hasten it yet more.
At my age I'm so inured to it, that if I woke up one morning to find that all the women in town had decided to take their morning walks "in the nude", I would find it hilarious rather than arousing.
|
Allow me to put a female's spin on this issue. How DARE you imply that ... nah, just kidding.
I actually agree with you for the most part. Sex among the youth of today is commonplace. It's almost blasé, just something to do on a Saturday night. It could easily show up on a 'to do' list magnetized to the refrigerator.
1. feed the cat
2. pick up chinese take-out
3. do physics homework
4. have sex with someone
5. take out garbage
6. buy more pencils
I refused to be that way. Now, I'm definitely not a sainted virgin, but I wasn't one of those girls, of which there were MANY, who would put out to any guy wearing Greek letters or had a good build. The result is an entire generation of men who think nothing of womanizing and engaging in misogynistic behavior. For a time, after first arriving to the U.S., I felt awkward and out-of-place being the only non-white, non-Nordic person in the room (even if 75% of the other girls dyed their hair blonde).
After a short time, though, I realized that PYTs ("pretty young things") were a dime a dozen. College campuses are filled to bursting with petite blondes. I began to relish in my exotic appearance - at least by comparison. So did a lot of the guys.
BUT ... more to the point, I didn't run around all the time in skimpy little outfits - skirts so short that I'd have to constantly pull it down and leg muscles straining to keep my legs tightly crossed when I sat. No, no tops so low cut that I dare not bend over or cut-off shirts so high that reaching for anything resulted in an unintended peep show.
I think you lose value that way, and that was something I was taught from the git-go. We girls really DO become "pretty young
things" when we constantly dress for sex. You become something worse than a prostitute. You become a prostitute stupid enough to work for free.
Women, though, usually dress to impress other women. The skimpy outfits are just the way women compete. My body is better than yours. I'm the one going home with the fraternity hunk tonight. Look at me, ain't I a hottie? The skimpy clothes are designed to make other women feel inferior, jealous, and insecure. That's not -always- the reason, but it is much of the time. Men of my generation, heh, they don't care if you're wearing a burlap sack given that their goal is to get you OUT of your clothes, not stand there and look at you wearing them. You'll never catch a guy saying, "Wow, that Mary, she looks cute in that outfit." LOL! No, it's always the butt and the boobs - even the prettiness of your face means little. I've overheard many guys talking about girls with an ugly face but good body, "Yeah, if I put a bag over her head, I'd do her."
Me, well, I was always the odd one. I had a lot of friends, sure, but I tended to bounce from clique to clique because almost invariably the guys wouldn't take you seriously unless you sexed them up - and the girls in the clique adored them for the way they womanized them. I ended up entrenching myself with the geeks for at least -most- of them had kind hearts and gentle souls, and they did not take women for granted. But I'd still go to parties and marvel at the absurdity of human behavior. I think I rolled my eyes at least as often as I blinked them. Uh huh, you could accuse me of being a bit smug in this regard; I suppose it's one of my human failings. However, it's a smugness I cherish because I really don't want to be a part of the human miasma of sex, competition for sex, and parading around like a bargain-basement prostitute just to gain acceptance and popularity.
As someone who has yet to hit 30, I'm not overly fond of my generation. A good friend of mine once said that I had been born in the wrong time in the wrong era. Perhaps. The Hindu in me thinks that my reincarnation happened without a complete memory wipe. That somehow older values from a past life have lingered - or perhaps my soul is growing older. Who knows? Not that I believe in reincarnation, mind you. But I have wondered how I ended up so ... different ... than my peers. Whatever the case, the girls who dress yet barely dress at all aren't doing us girls any favors, and they're all going to have a lousy time of it later in life when they try to get jobs in world still run by men. How will my generation of men ever learn to respect women when the women seem to have no respect for themselves?
The "above it all" attitude does win you a good deal of respect. People start treating you like the wisened graybeard of the group always coming to you for advice and opinions. But it can be a lonely place to be sometimes - but it's a loneliness I chose because I couldn't be anyone else but who I am.
And that's my take on what you said ... because I do think you've hit (yet again) that proverbial nail on its equally proverbial head.