Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well what archaeology are you talking about??? Give me a clue at least! I mean are you talking about say...archaeological evidence for the tower of Babel (which would be astonishing) or are you just saying that there is say - archaeological evidence for a house that the Bible says existed in Jerusalem (which would be of no significance). Tell me what you are talking about.
What 'multiple sources support the context,
Eye witness accounts are no more reliable that the eye-witness accounts of Bigfoot, The Loch Ness monster or aliens from outer space.
Wow, you mean you haven't heard?
Archaeologists so far have unearthed the following evidence that proves the Bible is true:
A piece of water with Jesus's footprints on it
A piece of the burning bush ... and it's still burning
tape recordings of the talking snake from Eden who went on to give lectures at the University of Cairo
Lot's wife, who later auditioned to be one of the Spice Girls (heh heh heh)
An eyeball that was once blind but was magically healed by Jesus
A plague boil that fell off someone who, again, was magically healed by Jesus
Two thousand year-old fish and loaves containing a faint magical residue suggesting they were poofed into existence straight out of thin air
Some weird misty crap inside a bottle that, when opened, killed the first born of every archaeologist at the dig site
A staff that turned into a snake
Ancient undulating ripples on the surface of the Red Sea suggesting that the waters had been parted some 3,000 years ago
Stone tablets with profanity written in 279 different languages, obviously chiseled the very moment everyone realized no one could understand anyone else
The ruins of the entire city of Nazareth
5 or 6 different "Spears of Destiny" at at least a hundred splinters from the True Cross of Jesus
I mean, seriously, who wouldn't be a believer after this archaeological haul?
Archaeologists so far have unearthed the following evidence that proves the Bible is true:
A piece of water with Jesus's footprints on it
A piece of the burning bush ... and it's still burning
tape recordings of the talking snake from Eden who went on to give lectures at the University of Cairo
Lot's wife, who later auditioned to be one of the Spice Girls (heh heh heh)
An eyeball that was once blind but was magically healed by Jesus
A plague boil that fell off someone who, again, was magically healed by Jesus
Two thousand year-old fish and loaves containing a faint magical residue suggesting they were poofed into existence straight out of thin air
Some weird misty crap inside a bottle that, when opened, killed the first born of every archaeologist at the dig site
A staff that turned into a snake
Ancient undulating ripples on the surface of the Red Sea suggesting that the waters had been parted some 3,000 years ago
Stone tablets with profanity written in 279 different languages, obviously chiseled the very moment everyone realized no one could understand anyone else
The ruins of the entire city of Nazareth
5 or 6 different "Spears of Destiny" at at least a hundred splinters from the True Cross of Jesus
I mean, seriously, who wouldn't be a believer after this archaeological haul?
You still wouldn't be convinced. "So what, just because you got splinters from the cross of Christ doesn't mean Christ really lived!!".
You still wouldn't be convinced. "So what, just because you got splinters from the cross of Christ doesn't mean Christ really lived!!".
Prove it was from the cross of Christ (and that Christ was real, and indeed crucified) and we will talk. Until then.... What archaeological evidence do you have, Jeff? Please, provide us with it. Or are you going to cop out of providing that evidence as well?
Prove it was from the cross of Christ (and that Christ was real, and indeed crucified) and we will talk. Until then.... What archaeological evidence do you have, Jeff? Please, provide us with it. Or are you going to cop out of providing that evidence as well?
Prove it was from the cross of Christ (and that Christ was real, and indeed crucified) and we will talk. Until then.... What archaeological evidence do you have, Jeff? Please, provide us with it. Or are you going to cop out of providing that evidence as well?
Prove to me that Alexander the Great really existed. Again, I presented evidence. It is simply dishonest to say I am copping out because you stubbornly refuse to accept it.
You still wouldn't be convinced. "So what, just because you got splinters from the cross of Christ doesn't mean Christ really lived!!".
If it could some how be scientifically proven that the splinters really were from Jesus's cross, no, I wouldn't be convinced that Jesus was the Son of God. All it would prove is that Jesus actually existed and that he really was crucified.
However, I would put more stock in the truth of Jesus's life and take it more seriously.
I find it rather irksome, Jeff, when you try to tell me what I would do, say, or think. Why don't you let me speak for myself, okay? How about ASKING me how I would react or what I would think instead of just making these big assumptions on my behalf. You just might be surprised. Thanks in advance.
("You're right, Shirina. I shouldn't take control of you like some kind of puppet and presume to speak for you. My apologies. From now on, I'll ask you what you'd think if, for instance, there were real splinters from the cross of Jesus. Godspeed!")
Prove to me that Alexander the Great really existed. Again, I presented evidence. It is simply dishonest to say I am copping out because you stubbornly refuse to accept it.
I am not the one saying he exists, you are. I have seen you post exactly ZERO evidence. Either man up and admit you can't prove it, or give us some evidence. Archaeological evidence is a good start. So.... What are you waiting for?
In other words....
"No, I can't so therefore I will now deflect and look like a typical hypocritical fundy!"
Just admit it Eusie, you can't PROVE that someone did not exist. You can't even prove Jesus DID live. So stop being a troll and admit it like a man.
There is plenty of evidence that Christ lived. To believe He never did is like people believing the earth is flat or the moon is made of cheese.
There is plenty of evidence that Christ lived. To believe He never did is like people believing the earth is flat or the moon is made of cheese.
So where is the evidence outside of your Bible or other "holy books"? Even if you can prove he did in fact live, you still can't prove he was the son of God.
Then tell me what is considered "verifiable evidence" ? If archaeology doesn't count, multiple sources supported the context, eyewitness accounts are not evidence then what else is left?
Typical atheistic smokescreen tactics. Let's obscure the fact that we have no proof of our own assertion by asking you provide verifiable evidence, which you either cannot give because you aren't a researcher/archaeologist. If you can give it, say that isn't verifiable using arbitrary standards of what is verifiable.
Okay then. What would be verifiable evidence for atheism?
There is no verifiable evidence for atheism. On the other hand, God might indeed be a sick God. Which was the topic. Remember?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
