Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The time for trial etc is much cut down if one supposes that the arrest was done by Pilate, who knew exactly what Jesus had been up to and why he was a danger. If the Sadducees were involved at all it was as translators. But this is to depart from the Gospel story.
The 'swoon' theory on the other hand depends on the gospel story. I have explained elsewhere how the story only makes sense if a swoon, induced by Arimathea, gets Jesus off the cross alive, and is of course removed (by the people who put him there) a few hours later, and long before the guard is placed.
This is rejected, of course and for one good reason - if we can trust Paul at all, Jesus had to be dead.
I won't go into that here, but would remark that it does raise a question about Matadora's myth. Unless we dismiss the letters of Paul as pure invention (and I honestly can't), then we have to accept the apostles as real and that means a leader who was real. And also a belief in a resurrection.
That's not a problem, as a dead Jesus and a risen spirit is not only an explanation but one that fits the text better than a bodily resurrection. So we have a real Jesus but a myth, indeed, or rather an invented story.