Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-12-2016, 08:48 PM
 
Location: Salt Lake City
28,090 posts, read 29,934,993 times
Reputation: 13118

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by badlander View Post
But you are not one of them. Sometime in the 50s or 60s it became ok t9 be Jewish maybe because Arabs were less l8ked, I don't know.
You lost me. Who am I not one of?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2016, 10:10 AM
 
19,942 posts, read 17,180,832 times
Reputation: 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroutDude View Post
That's a lie, preacher.

You are against gay people marrying the ones they love and would revoke the law if you could.
I've asked this before and I'll ask it again: why do you believe they should be guaranteed a right to marry for love when no one else is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2016, 10:29 AM
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
31,373 posts, read 20,168,052 times
Reputation: 14069
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio View Post
I've asked this before and I'll ask it again: why do you believe they should be guaranteed a right to marry for love when no one else is?
Yeah, you've asked a lot of stupid questions. Often the same one many times.

Like that one.

Who said "guaranteed?" Not me. Just you, in another attempt to shift the goal posts.

They should be "allowed" to marry the person they love. Just like you and I are allowed to marry the persons we love.

Now, please do us all a favour and retire that particular stupid question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2016, 10:38 AM
 
19,942 posts, read 17,180,832 times
Reputation: 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroutDude View Post
Yeah, you've asked a lot of stupid questions. Often the same one many times.

Like that one.

Who said "guaranteed?" Not me. Just you, in another attempt to shift the goal posts.

They should be "allowed" to marry the person they love. Just like you and I are allowed to marry the persons we love.

Now, please do us all a favour and retire that particular stupid question.
There are many many people that are not allowed to marry "for love". Why are gay people any different?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2016, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
31,373 posts, read 20,168,052 times
Reputation: 14069
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio View Post
There are many many people that are not allowed to marry "for love". Why are gay people any different?
Which "many many?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2016, 10:44 AM
 
9,345 posts, read 4,320,166 times
Reputation: 3023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katzpur View Post
You lost me. Who am I not one of?
The white protestant real Americans
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2016, 10:52 AM
 
19,942 posts, read 17,180,832 times
Reputation: 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by badlander View Post
The white protestant real Americans
Did you just tell her she isn't a protestant?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2016, 10:55 AM
 
9,345 posts, read 4,320,166 times
Reputation: 3023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio View Post
I've asked this before and I'll ask it again: why do you believe they should be guaranteed a right to marry for love when no one else is?
Let's rephrase ot, they are now allowed to choose to marry someone of a gender that they are sexually attractive to. 8 know you like these little word games you play in an attempt to belittle gays and discount their marrages as of less value that yours. The law now allows them to marry someone who they are attracted to and love. The law never guarantees that they will find love but they now have the same legal option as you did, the right to find someone of their sexual orientation, no more and no less. That you use several different word games to dismiss ssm infers that it must be more than your religious views than makes you oppose equal marriage rights or maybe you are trying to hide the religious point totally. Whatever it is transparent, you love gays so much you are willing to keep them as second class persons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2016, 10:59 AM
 
9,345 posts, read 4,320,166 times
Reputation: 3023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio View Post
Did you just tell her she isn't a protestant?
Read all the words. And no I have said over and over again, to be if a person calls themselves a Christian they are a Christian. She is one of the most Christian on this board in my opinion and most of you should study what she posts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2016, 11:03 AM
 
19,942 posts, read 17,180,832 times
Reputation: 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by badlander View Post
Let's rephrase ot, they are now allowed to choose to marry someone of a gender that they are sexually attractive to. 8 know you like these little word games you play in an attempt to belittle gays and discount their marrages as of less value that yours. The law now allows them to marry someone who they are attracted to and love. The law never guarantees that they will find love but they now have the same legal option as you did, the right to find someone of their sexual orientation, no more and no less. That you use several different word games to dismiss ssm infers that it must be more than your religious views than makes you oppose equal marriage rights or maybe you are trying to hide the religious point totally. Whatever it is transparent, you love gays so much you are willing to keep them as second class persons.
Instead of trying to attack me personally and accuse me of having motives that I don't have, why not answer the question? This has nothing to do with one's sexual preferences. I honestly don't care if you're homosexual, and no one asked me about my preferences when I got married. It's a non-sequitur.

What is it that makes a homosexual special that he/she needs to have special legislation to marry in a way they previously could not marry?

There are men and women in this country that would like to marry their close sibling, or to take a 2nd husband or wife. Why are homosexuals more privileged?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:52 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top