DNA evidence: Missing link mated with humans (about, truth, quote)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Another serious problem you have is the lack of transitional fossils. If evolution was true, the great number of fossils would be transitional and you have zilch, nada, none.
Au contraire, we have *plenty* of transitional fossils. Assertions otherwise, are not the truth.
Of course I know why. Man did not evolve from apes or the DNA would verify the connection. l It seems you have let your obvious bias keep you from understanding DNA.
No story needed. God put DNA in almost every living thing in a way that all living things could be separated from other living things.
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,887,758 times
Reputation: 4560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zymer
You apparently want to avoid the fact that DNA *does* verify the connection...to the point that bonobos and chimps are more closely related to humans than to gorillas.
There is less than a 2% difference between you and a chimp.
Here, have a banana. It's perfectly designed to fit in your...mouth.
Correct. The process of change never stops. However, when we think of 'Transitional' forms, we are looking at the those even more particular than representing times of rapid change compared with the longer periods of equilibrium. We really are talking about tose that show characteristics that show a change from one kind (pardon the term ) of creature to another, for example, a fish to a land creature or a land creature to a sea creature (Ambulocetus, for example), a tree -dwelling dinosaur to a creature able to fly, and a tree -dwelling primate to one that lived on the ground.
Originally Posted by omega2xx Another serious problem you have is the lack of transitional fossils. If evolution was true, the great number of fossils would be transitional and you have zilch, nada, none.
Sounds exactly like him.
Quote:
Trip to the ark park?
What...to sabotage the Pakicetus model? Eusebus couldn't believe that Hamm had effectively endorsed the cetan sequence.
Originally Posted by omega2xx Another serious problem you have is the lack of transitional fossils. If evolution was true, the great number of fossils would be transitional and you have zilch, nada, none.
Sounds exactly like him.
Exactly. Edgar disappears and his twin brother omega arrives.
Hey, look! Another Evolution VS Creationism debate.
~~Back up 20 steps from brick wall...lower head...run forward as fast as possible...BAM!! Repeat, repeat, repeat.
~~Drop to knees in desert...start punching at ground...keep punching for years and years.
But please don't ever stop...I love how amusing it is. It shows how obsessed and whacked-out each side is. HaHaHa!
For those on the Fundie Religious side...you prove ignorance is bliss.
For those on the Science side...you prove absolutely that intellect does not equate to wisdom.
Neither prove anything but the above to the other.
Carry on! LOL!
You're not answering Edgar. Would the reason be the same reason why you didn't answer in your previous life? Answer Edgar...
1. explain the general idea of DNA genome mapping and how it is used to track the genotypic background of a modern species?
2. explain three types of tRNA or DNA transcription errors in mitosis.
Hey omega! Still waiting
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
) of creature to another, for example, a fish to a land creature or a land creature to a sea creature (Ambulocetus, for example), a tree -dwelling dinosaur to a creature able to fly, and a tree -dwelling primate to one that lived on the ground.
really? 
