Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2016, 02:05 PM
 
30,902 posts, read 32,998,960 times
Reputation: 26919

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
Religion, and especially the evangelicals on this board, frequently attempt to equate particularly homosexual sexual conduct with immorality. So, what is immoral? How does your religion address that issue when it comes to sex, and why constrain one activity and not another?

I am looking for discussion from a religious perspective as it relates to sexual activity, in this case, incest.
Oh, I see.

I'm not religious so I guess I can't give that sort of input.

I think you should specify what you just said ^ here ^, though, because otherwise people are not going to understand what you want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-19-2016, 02:07 PM
 
Location: Logan Township, Minnesota
15,501 posts, read 17,075,596 times
Reputation: 7539
While people who follow a moral code probably believe it is a universal code, I doubt there is a single Morality coe applicable to all people at all times and under all circumstances.

With that said I am an American and Muslim. the Morality codes of both consider incest to be immoral. There are minor differences of opinion as to what constitutes incest. In Islam and several states sexual relations are permitted between cousins. For myself it is a moot point I do not recall ever having any sexual desires towards any of my cousins.

Now as I consider it morally correct to abide by the morality codes of the Nation I live in and as required by my religious believes I believe it would be immoral for me to have sexual relations with a close female relative even it it were with mutual consent. Now if John and Jane happen to be Brother and sister, it is not my right to impose my concept of morality upon them. Each person is morally obligated to abide by the rules of their religion and Nation. If that is morally right is a matter of individual opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 02:40 PM
 
28,432 posts, read 11,577,622 times
Reputation: 2070
who pays for the warped offspring?

no offspring ... I dont care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 03:52 PM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
5,671 posts, read 4,352,196 times
Reputation: 2610
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerZ View Post
I think an issue with incest is that so often there is the dynamic of power/powerlessness and/or coercion, even when the two are similar in age.

I mean really. How many stories do you hear (and you WOULD hear them...this is the internet) of literally, two fully-adult, consenting siblings (for example) or a parent/child who are both adults, healthily and logically beginning a sexual relationship with one another?

This hypothetical situation - two fully grown, mature, logical people making, with no power-play or coercion involved, a calm decision to have a romantic/sexual relationship together - is going to be the exception by far as opposed to the rule. (And not just because society is horrified by it or because of laws. People do things all the time that society is horrified by and that may even be against the law, with the argument that "on principle" nothing is actually wrong with what they're doing. Indeed, if laws and societal horror were preventatives then there would be no incestuous rape cases of children, and obviously, there are plenty and then some.)

This logic would be similar to saying: why is EVERY case of an 11-year-old having sex with her teacher wrong? What if we can locate at least several situations where the 11-year-old was both physically and mentally mature, the girl had a well above-average IQ and an emotional equivalent close to that of an 18-year-old and THEY TOGETHER logically and rationally decided to have sex, with appropriate protection...wouldn't this be evidence that 1. ephibophilia should be legal and 2. sex between an underage student and a teacher should be legal?

Well, no. It wouldn't. Rather it would be: Here's an EXTREME exception, with a few backups also in the extreme, but possible to find given there are 7.5 billion people on earth so it's bound to happen somewhere, some time. Let's change all the laws based on that, and allow millions to get hurt in the process.

Not logical.

Overwhelmingly when you hear stories of incest, there is coercion or a power play involved. It is obviously a FREQUENT element and to dismiss this because it is somewhere, some time possible that two fully-adult (legally, physically and mentally) individuals of sound mind made such a decision and nobody got hurt, doesn't change that fact.

And by the way, the thought of what would happen to family members in a presumed inferior position everywhere were incest to become legal is just shudder-worthy.
*We already have anti-sexual battery/assault/groping laws. I figure that covers any type of sexual assault, unwanted incest included. I'm not sure exactly what the are...but I'd hope they'd cover all the sorts of unwanted touching a person would want covered.

*The difference I see between statutory rape and incest between relatives of similar ages is...who do you punish when an 14 year old has intercourse with a 15 year old? Now, if an 11 year old has intercourse with 30 year old, we can easily determine it would be more sensible to punish the 30 year old. The 30 year old should have known better. Sure, incest is a bad idea in most cases...but if there's no sexual assault that took place or unwanted touching, whose there to punish? (and sometimes I'm sure incest will actually be a good thing, like if two siblings have nobody but each other and know each other better than I ever will, it will be none of my business how the go about developing their love lives).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 03:54 PM
 
9,345 posts, read 4,323,862 times
Reputation: 3023
I noted that this topic is also in the Great Debates forum started by a different person of course but there are other people's opinion there is any one is interested.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 06:29 PM
 
22,178 posts, read 19,217,049 times
Reputation: 18302
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
.. if two consenting adults are in a sexual relationship, it is no one's business except the two concerned. Should this be carried over to incest?
If you think incest is fine, or can't see why it is NOT FINE....then you have a serious need for professional help
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 06:37 PM
 
30,902 posts, read 32,998,960 times
Reputation: 26919
Do
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arach Angle View Post
who pays for the warped offspring?

no offspring ... I dont care.
Well...logically, as eew as the thought of incest may be, every day people all over the world deliberately have children knowing there is a chance of passing on specific genetic issues to the child, issues the parents may have themselves, or run in the family, which they know their offspring have X% chance of having. But we have no laws forbidding dwarves, autistic people, or sickle-cell anemia - or for that matter, alcoholics or people with schizophrenia (or incidence in the immediate family) - from reproducing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 06:43 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,358,815 times
Reputation: 73932
I think there are an awful lot of people who are obsessed with other people's sex lives.

Also homosexuality and incest are completely unrelated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 06:50 PM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,920,960 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tzaphkiel View Post
If you think incest is fine, or can't see why it is NOT FINE....then you have a serious need for professional help
I never said I endorse it, however, what moral argument can you make against it, as long as two consenting adults are involved?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-19-2016, 06:55 PM
 
12,595 posts, read 6,650,323 times
Reputation: 1350
Quote:
Originally Posted by badlander View Post
I noted that this topic is also in the Great Debates forum started by a different person of course but there are other people's opinion there is any one is interested.
Not new here. Read the whole thread, some interesting perspectives:
Incest...Immoral or just Unhealthy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top