Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you ever study the Bible long enough to understand it, get back to me. Your embellishments and false, jugmental statements and lack of understanding show you have a long way to go.
Why would a god create a manual for life that needs to be studied? A bible for everyone to understand is to much for your omnidude?
If you really understood science you would know that it actually disproves the TOE. You don't even understand basic genetics and evidently you believe nothing can be the source of something. That is about as foolish as one can be.
To believe life originated from lifeless elements and all living things, plants and animals originated from a single source, which no one knows what it was, takes much more faith than I have.
And still nothing to validate the claims about Jesus. Even if the the theory of evolution was shown to be false (which from Darwin to Dover, the denialists have never been able to do) and science admitted that life can never come from non -fife, and "something" can never come from "nothing" (both of which Opinions are close to being overturned) that would not do a darn thing to validate the Gospel Jesus, which I will go out on a personal limb to say is also close to overturned, if people are willing to set aside their Opinions and listen to the evidence. The internal evidence of four discrepant and fabricated gospels.
As I recall i provided three+ examples, which have been ignored. The attempts to validate Gospel Jesus through the back door by claiming the disciples believed what is in the gospels have been shown worthless; the disciples never read the gospels, and if they had they would have been appalled. Just as they were appalled by what Paul was doing with their religion.
We have had more excuses for not having a shred of decent evidence for Gospel -Jesus than Brig has barnacles. Excuses, evasions, misdirections, tricks, rhetorical ploys, and good old 'Just have Faith'. No arguments that stand up. None - even if they try.
While I take Gldrule's point about numbers (which only proves how persuasive a lie can be) the credibility of the Bible is crumbling faster than Creationism.
If you really understood science you would know that it actually disproves the TOE.
Quote:
You don't even understand basic genetics and evidently you believe nothing can be the source of something. That is about as foolish as one can be.
Don't tell us. We don't think that 'something came from nothing'. Tell it to the theists that claim their god created everything...from nothing.
Quote:
To believe life originated from lifeless elements and all living things, plants and animals originated from a single source, which no one knows what it was, takes much more faith than I have.
And still nothing to validate the claims about Jesus.
The NT, especially the gospels, validate Jesus. You just don't accept the evidence and you can't prove any of it wrong.
Quote:
Even if the the theory of evolution was shown to be false (which from Darwin to Dover, the denialists have never been able to do) and science admitted that life can never come from non -fife, and "something" can never come from "nothing" (both of which Opinions are close to being overturned) that would not do a darn thing to validate the Gospel Jesus, which I will go out on a personal limb to say is also close to overturned, if people are willing to set aside their Opinions and listen to the evidence. The internal evidence of four discrepant and fabricated gospels.
Congratulations, you finally got something right. Science can't validate who Jesus is and what He did.
The gospels for that. If you don't accept the testimony of 4 men who considered bearing false witness a sin, you will never see the truth. Of course you denying the evidence does snot make it false.
As I recall i provided three+ examples, which have been ignored. The attempts to validate Gospel Jesus through the back door by claiming the disciples believed what is in the gospels have been shown worthless; the disciples never read the gospels, and if they had they would have been appalled. Just as they were appalled by what Paul was doing with their religion.
Quote:
We have had more excuses for not having a shred of decent evidence for Gospel -Jesus than Brig has barnacles. Excuses, evasions, misdirections, tricks, rhetorical ploys, and good old 'Just have Faith'. No arguments that stand up. None - even if they try
There is also no evidence that refutes the gospels.
Quote:
While I take Gldrule's point about numbers (which only proves how persuasive a lie can be) the credibility of the Bible is crumbling faster than Creationism.
The real liar is the one who calls someone else a liar but can't prove it. That is also dishonest.
Don't tell us. We don't think that 'something came from nothing'. Tell it to the theists that claim their god created everything...from nothing.
...and also intelligence by the look of it!
Instead of your snide remarks, why not explain, scientifically, that is, how did life originate from lifeless elements and what is the source of matter and energy?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.