Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-12-2017, 08:13 AM
 
13,011 posts, read 13,047,890 times
Reputation: 21914

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BaptistFundie View Post
It's fairly typical of clergy in the US. They opt out of SS, and don't get a guaranteed income later. The housing allowance allows one to put money into a house and have assets later. Not to mention, cover business expenses, the way anyone else would do so.
This sounds like a personal financial decision. Although the factors leading clergy to make this decision may include the housing allowance, that does not in and of itself validate the housing allowance.

Quote:
Keep in mind, the housing allowance really just gives on a tax deduction off of the self-employment portion of the taxes.
No, they are unrelated. What is related is if a clergy member opts out of SS, they no longer have to pay FICA (commonly called social security) or SECA (commonly called self employment tax)

Quote:
He is considered a private contractor, and pays self-employment fees.
True, but you said he opted out of SS, so he no longer has to pay that.

Quote:
Just like any small business owner does. If you want to open a business and work out of your home, go for it. You can probably even get a deduction.
Yes, you can deduct that PORTION of the home that is used EXCLUSIVELY for business. Not the entire cost of the housing.

Quote:
Anyone can claim business expenses.
True. But not everyone can claim their entire housing expense as a business expense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-12-2017, 08:15 AM
 
13,011 posts, read 13,047,890 times
Reputation: 21914
Quote:
Originally Posted by L8Gr8Apost8 View Post
How does that work? He doesn't have to pay into SS?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaptistFundie View Post
No. And he doesn't draw from it later on.
So why bring up the extra expense, which he doesn't pay, as a rationale for tax exemption of housing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 08:25 AM
 
18,976 posts, read 7,020,934 times
Reputation: 3584
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishbrains View Post
So why bring up the extra expense, which he doesn't pay, as a rationale for tax exemption of housing?
Because a home is an asset. It's one of the ONLY assets clergy might have come retirement age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 08:30 AM
 
13,011 posts, read 13,047,890 times
Reputation: 21914
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaptistFundie View Post
Because a home is an asset. It's one of the ONLY assets clergy might have come retirement age.
Thanks for backing up my point.

A home is a personal asset, which clergy get based upon tax free income because of the housing allowance,. Therefore it is in no way an offset to the fact that clergy don't have to pay FICA/SECA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 08:33 AM
 
Location: minnesota
15,860 posts, read 6,325,302 times
Reputation: 5057
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaptistFundie View Post
Because a home is an asset. It's one of the ONLY assets clergy might have come retirement age.
So how is he supposed to live? That seems like poor planning to be allowed not to pay the 15% tax everyone else has to and then end up not being able to support yourself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 08:37 AM
 
18,976 posts, read 7,020,934 times
Reputation: 3584
Quote:
Originally Posted by L8Gr8Apost8 View Post
So how is he supposed to live? That seems like poor planning to be allowed not to pay the 15% tax everyone else has to and then end up not being able to support yourself.
That's just the way it is. Pastors don't go into ministry for the money. I know my church is poor and we would not be able to give him a $10k/year raise to make up for it.

Call it what it is..this is an attack on Christianity, and it's what Dan Barker does. He's a cowardly little man that is bitter about the time he spent in religion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 08:43 AM
 
Location: minnesota
15,860 posts, read 6,325,302 times
Reputation: 5057
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaptistFundie View Post
That's just the way it is. Pastors don't go into ministry for the money. I know my church is poor and we would not be able to give him a $10k/year raise to make up for it.

Call it what it is..this is an attack on Christianity, and it's what Dan Barker does. He's a cowardly little man that is bitter about the time he spent in religion.
Asking someone to pay their share is an attack?

Edit: BTW 10000 is 15% of 70000. So basically this man makes 80000(earnings+tax incentive) which is far above what the majority of families live on. Along with all the other perks regular Americans are not entitled to and are paying for so we can have a protected class of individuals and corporations that don't pay their share and anyone that says "Hey, that ain't right" is some kind of evil tool of Satan. I call BS!

Last edited by L8Gr8Apost8; 10-12-2017 at 08:53 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
31,373 posts, read 20,184,822 times
Reputation: 14070
Quote:
Originally Posted by L8Gr8Apost8 View Post
Asking someone to pay their share is an attack?
If you're not goosestepping the fundie line, you're attacking the poor, delicate dears.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 10:07 AM
 
18,976 posts, read 7,020,934 times
Reputation: 3584
Quote:
Originally Posted by L8Gr8Apost8 View Post
Asking someone to pay their share is an attack?

Edit: BTW 10000 is 15% of 70000. So basically this man makes 80000(earnings+tax incentive) which is far above what the majority of families live on. Along with all the other perks regular Americans are not entitled to and are paying for so we can have a protected class of individuals and corporations that don't pay their share and anyone that says "Hey, that ain't right" is some kind of evil tool of Satan. I call BS!
Actually, the 1st Amendment grants the freedom to worship. That is why churches don't pay taxes, and it's largely why a parsonage is not taxed. The church is exempt.

And no---our pastor doesn't make $80k. He makes $50k. So, the amount would be less. I hadn't done the math, so I just used a nice round #. Out of that $50k he has to raise a family, and buy a house that is to be used for ministry purposes, as well as pay all of his taxes, including self-employment tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2017, 10:21 AM
 
13,011 posts, read 13,047,890 times
Reputation: 21914
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaptistFundie View Post
Actually, the 1st Amendment grants the freedom to worship. That is why churches don't pay taxes, and it's largely why a parsonage is not taxed. The church is exempt.
We aren’t talking about the church directly, we are talking about clergy housing allowance. Related I agree, but they are distinct issues.

Quote:
And no---our pastor doesn't make $80k. He makes $50k.
How much your pastor makes isn’t technically relevant to the larger principle, but I will indulge you.

Is that $50k in total, which would be salary and housing included, or is it $50k for salary only?

Quote:
So, the amount would be less. I hadn't done the math, so I just used a nice round #. Out of that $50k he has to raise a family, and buy a house that is to be used for ministry purposes, as well as pay all of his taxes, including self-employment tax.
Lots of people have to raise a family on $50k. Irrelevant to the discussion

Lots of people have to buy a house, and many use their homes for business. Why should he be allowed the purchase of a house tax-free when most people aren’t? Why not simply deduct the portion of the house used for ministerial purposes, just like anybody else who operates a home business?

Everybody has to pay taxes out of their salary. I don’t understand why you note this as special for clergy

Why is he paying self employment tax? You said that he opted out of social security, which means he doesn’t have to pay self employment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top