Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-09-2019, 07:12 AM
 
28,432 posts, read 11,575,455 times
Reputation: 2070

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GldnRule View Post
The "dirt" on the Founding Fathers requires no "digging".
Actually, as respects Religious Indoctrination of the Society....it has been all over it, ever since they ran their game.
Their conjob writings and rules to the contrary, notwithstanding.
That is the point I try to make...when someone makes the claim they did not like religion, or wanted the Country to be secular. Their actions proved different.
yeah, but everybody was religious back then. I think they would have ran things different today. They operated as free as they could under that system. I actually think they did a great job under the confines of society at that time. they are trying to lessen the affect of one religion deciding the rules. In a room full of religious people.

I think they were deist or pantheist myself. A lot of them were smart enough to understand that no biblegod existed but they really have no proof. When we don't have proof we can get all twisted up convoluted logic. Trans is an excellent of of convoluted logic. his twisted up notions having to answer to no-god and anti-religion is an excellent of convoluted twisted up logic supporting a less valid statement of belief.

the forefathers got stuck, just a bit, in it too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-09-2019, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,794 posts, read 24,297,543 times
Reputation: 32935
Quote:
Originally Posted by GldnRule View Post
The "dirt" on the Founding Fathers requires no "digging".
Actually, as respects Religious Indoctrination of the Society....it has been all over it, ever since they ran their game.
Their conjob writings and rules to the contrary, notwithstanding.
That is the point I try to make...when someone makes the claim they did not like religion, or wanted the Country to be secular. Their actions proved different.
I'm going to be a little more generous to the floundering fathers. They were imperfect men...just as you and I are. They worked in a world that was much different than ours, and with their own faults and foibles still tried to create a more perfect union. In some ways they succeeded, in other ways they failed...and we still haven't gotten it right since then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2019, 11:05 AM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,087 posts, read 20,712,695 times
Reputation: 5930
Quote:
Originally Posted by GldnRule View Post
The "dirt" on the Founding Fathers requires no "digging".
Actually, as respects Religious Indoctrination of the Society....it has been all over it, ever since they ran their game.
Their conjob writings and rules to the contrary, notwithstanding.
That is the point I try to make...when someone makes the claim they did not like religion, or wanted the Country to be secular. Their actions proved different.
Well, you really refute yourself here. You sideline what they wrote - their ideals in fact - and try to pretend that these were not their ideals because of their failings. That's what i mean by 'dirt -digging'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2019, 11:33 AM
 
12,595 posts, read 6,649,477 times
Reputation: 1350
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRANSPONDER View Post
Well, you really refute yourself here. You sideline what they wrote - their ideals in fact - and try to pretend that these were not their ideals because of their failings. That's what i mean by 'dirt -digging'.
What they wrote was cool...very.
How they acted and what they did was the opposite of what they wrote, and not just as regards Religion...but as regards many cool things they wrote.
Slavemaster, woman oppressing dudes, carrying out a genocide...saying and endorsing the declaration that all men are created equal. You don't get more hypocritical than that. Conmen...hungry for power, prestige, and the highlife...running a scam.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2019, 12:07 PM
 
Location: S. Wales.
50,087 posts, read 20,712,695 times
Reputation: 5930
Quote:
Originally Posted by GldnRule View Post
What they wrote was cool...very.
How they acted and what they did was the opposite of what they wrote, and not just as regards Religion...but as regards many cool things they wrote.
Slavemaster, woman oppressing dudes, carrying out a genocide...saying and endorsing the declaration that all men are created equal. You don't get more hypocritical than that. Conmen...hungry for power, prestige, and the highlife...running a scam.
At least you concede that what they wrote was cool. I also say that it is a very useful and convenient basis for separation of Church and state and the law to keep it that way. In return. I will concede that in themselves they were not plaster saints.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2019, 03:27 PM
 
12,595 posts, read 6,649,477 times
Reputation: 1350
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRANSPONDER View Post
At least you concede that what they wrote was cool. I also say that it is a very useful and convenient basis for separation of Church and state and the law to keep it that way. In return. I will concede that in themselves they were not plaster saints.
Religion does not belong in government and governing...not at all, IMO.
The reason it is, and has always been, so prevalent in the U.S....is because of the actions of those so-called Founding Fathers. They instigated it...and saw to it that it was ingrained and locked in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2019, 03:28 PM
 
Location: West Virginia
16,671 posts, read 15,665,596 times
Reputation: 10922
You can't judge late 18th Century people using 21st Century standards. You need to look at those people within the norms for that day and time.
__________________
Moderator posts are in RED.
City-Data Terms of Service: http://www.city-data.com/terms.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2019, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,794 posts, read 24,297,543 times
Reputation: 32935
Quote:
Originally Posted by mensaguy View Post
You can't judge late 18th Century people using 21st Century standards. You need to look at those people within the norms for that day and time.
I would say that's not quite true for christians since what's in the bible has not changed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2019, 04:16 PM
 
63,799 posts, read 40,068,856 times
Reputation: 7870
Quote:
Originally Posted by mensaguy View Post
You can't judge late 18th Century people using 21st Century standards. You need to look at those people within the norms for that day and time.
True. There is an evolution to the intangibles of our humanity just as there is to our physical bodies. It can be as unfair to judge our lack of humanity in a specific area where we had not collectively evolved the sensitivity to it as it would be to judge our lack of upright bipedal walking before we evolved the appropriate pelvis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2019, 05:07 PM
 
12,595 posts, read 6,649,477 times
Reputation: 1350
Quote:
Originally Posted by mensaguy View Post
You can't judge late 18th Century people using 21st Century standards. You need to look at those people within the norms for that day and time.
I didn't do that.
I was comparing what they wrote at the time (so, obviously they had "evolved" enough to know what was cool), to what they actually did at that same time.
I always note this in response to those that claim they were not into religion (didn't even like it), and wanted the nation they were assembling to be secular.
It's like someone giving you counsel that everyone should be honest...while they are picking your pocket. Based on what they are saying, they obviously are aware of the virtue of being above boards...but their actions are demonstrative of them being a scammer.
Once you know what they did...you would not say they "didn't like stealing", just because of what they were saying as they robbed you.
And you also wouldn't say they hadn't evolved to know being a thief was wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top