Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What are you looking for? I believe God exists outside of time (has always existed).
why base your traits of god on what is not known? You don't know if god is outside of time?
why not keep the traits of what you believe based on observations that science is finding out every day?Science is proving trans' sect of atheism dead wrong. In fact, trans is debunked as just am iron curtain anti-religious person on a rampage.
The best we can do in understanding something we don't understand is list the observations we have and link our statements of belief to those observations.
we are surrounded by life and connected to it at the fundamental levels of space time. Thats the best base line we have as a starting point.
both "thebiblegod" and "anti-religious" are far less valid base line observations. I call them **** poor axioms.
any lines of logic starting with those two "facts" end up hurting far more people than they are worth. Kind-a like having clowns as the base line for clothing.
why base your traits of god on what is not known? You don't know if god is outside of time?
why not keep the traits of what you believe based on observations that science is finding out every day?Science is proving trans' sect of atheism dead wrong. In fact, trans is debunked as just am iron curtain anti-religious person on a rampage.
The best we can do in understanding something we don't understand is list the observations we have and link our statements of belief to those observations.
we are surrounded by life and connected to it at the fundamental levels of space time. Thats the best base line we have as a starting point.
both "thebiblegod" and "anti-religious" are far less valid base line observations. I call them **** poor axioms.
any lines of logic starting with those two "facts" end up hurting far more people than they are worth. Kind-a like having clowns as the base line for clothing.
We depend upon revealed knowledge. The Bible told us that the earth was suspended in space as a globe.
The "science-faith" people in the ancient world believed that the earth was flat, because they were going on their limited observation. They didn't trust revealed knowledge because the people who believed in it were of such lowly stature in the eyes of the world. As if God wouldn't be able to speak to someone with a lower IQ.
why base your traits of god on what is not known? You don't know if god is outside of time?
why not keep the traits of what you believe based on observations that science is finding out every day?Science is proving trans' sect of atheism dead wrong. In fact, trans is debunked as just am iron curtain anti-religious person on a rampage.
The best we can do in understanding something we don't understand is list the observations we have and link our statements of belief to those observations.
we are surrounded by life and connected to it at the fundamental levels of space time. Thats the best base line we have as a starting point.
both "thebiblegod" and "anti-religious" are far less valid base line observations. I call them **** poor axioms.
any lines of logic starting with those two "facts" end up hurting far more people than they are worth. Kind-a like having clowns as the base line for clothing.
How does science conflict with the idea that God exists outside time as we know it?
No. I call SOME religious people "unthinking". I just told you about being with a group of christians who debated the topic...and most of them showed thinking skills.
You call ME unthinking. There was no need for that.
This would be my advice on answering this question...
Well, rather than being on the outside looking in...meaning using the intellect to figure this question out...
go to the source....go inside...know God...know His Nature, His Mind...
understand Him yourselves and it will all become clear. Forget books.
Have a direct experience of God or whatever you'd like to call the Creator, personally.
Bingo.
Be still.
We depend upon revealed knowledge. The Bible told us that the earth was suspended in space as a globe.
No it doesn't. Produce the chapter and verse.
Quote:
The "science-faith" people in the ancient world believed that the earth was flat, because they were going on their limited observation.
Balderdash! The Greeks mentioned a spherical Earth in the 6th century BCE. In the 3rd century BCE, Hellenistic astronomy established the spherical shape of the Earth. It was the Church that kept insisting that it was flat.
You call ME unthinking. There was no need for that.
No Jimmy, that's an "untruth". Here is the post you're talking about:
"Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmiej
Is that a requirement?
For the unthinking, no. For the thinking man who wants to understand his relationship with god...if there is such a being, yes -- how god came to be remains an unanswered question. Unanswered like many magical aspects of christianity."
Apparently you put yourself within my definition of unthinking.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It was the Church that kept insisting that it was flat.
