Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What would "none of the above" be? Wouldn't "agnostic" pretty much cover it?
yeah, I second mighty's.
Its something between deity and deny everything so we have a better chance to stop religion. Something that rational atheist and theist would say "oh, I see why we/they thought that."
I agree with Mighty Queen too. An 'It' (with respect) and 'agnostic -god'. Only I don't Believe in it a distinct from denying that could be any such thing; a mindset foisted on atheists by atheist -bashers and one that few if any that I have encountered actually hold. And we do see why they thought that. Residual faith, perhaps or just being won over by the complexity/order argument. Yes, we see it but we see that it really is a fallacious one.
Which doesn't mean that it has to be wrong, but there is no good evidential reason to suppose it's right. It does not justify credibility, let alone Belief as a fact.
What if someone believes that something called "God" exists,
but doesn't see God as a "he" or even as an actual person at all?
On a chart or list?
That would be called 'Smart". I think.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
