Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Are we allowed to answer mystic? I am under strict observation not to talk science. Basically, I unable/can't question/support you.
I know, Arach, but I am satisfied you do know what I am talking about and it is not quantum woo. If you have serious questions about the science I refer to, you can DM me with the specifics. I am just tired of the biased games being played here by virtual ignoramuses who seem to have no willingness or ability to think beyond their fixed and rigid atheism or fundamental theism. The strictures are what they are and we know why they are so let not your heart be troubled, my dear friend.
how did various sources of wisdom you enumerate get their moral compass from whom we are supposed to learn to control our animal instincts? Tautology a bit?
From the very spacetime field that manifests both the Spirit and the animal drives. (I am precluded from saying the God whose existence establishes our Reality.)
Are you some kind of quasi moderator for CD? I dpnt see your name on the list and yet you act as if you wrote the rules of engagement for the forum. Did you?
I have no idea, but I do believe there was an admission that he could be one of those consulted about the atheism definition among other things.
I know, Arach, but I am satisfied you do know what I am talking about and it is not quantum woo. If you have serious questions about the science I refer to, you can DM me with the specifics. I am just tired of the biased games being played here by virtual ignoramuses who seem to have no willingness or ability to think beyond their fixed and rigid atheism or fundamental theism. The strictures are what they are and we know why they are so let not your heart be troubled, my dear friend.
Once again we are the stupid, ignorant ones because you refuse to tell us this overwhelming scientific evidence.
From the very spacetime field that manifests both the Spirit and the animal drives. (I am precluded from saying the God whose existence establishes our Reality.)
What is the difference between 'them' and "us" if we all have the same source?
I know, Arach, but I am satisfied you do know what I am talking about and it is not quantum woo. If you have serious questions about the science I refer to, you can DM me with the specifics. I am just tired of the biased games being played here by virtual ignoramuses who seem to have no willingness or ability to think beyond their fixed and rigid atheism or fundamental theism. The strictures are what they are and we know why they are so let not your heart be troubled, my dear friend.
I am good with the information. Its a Dern shame tho. One would figure that talking about beliefs that have strong evidence for being really plausible would want to be discussed as a reasonable alternative to deity.
I always thought beliefs based on things we can actually point to and see would be sought after. Its weird how some atheist/theist are not real big on actually seeing what we are believing in. I don't know, to me, seeing it kind of adds creditability.
But belief that are base on science observation, not to mention in textbooks, are considered "Not going to get us anywhere.". If that statement doesn't reek of fundy-theist-type personality types nothing does.
What is the difference between 'them' and "us" if we all have the same source?
I am thoroughly familiar with where you are coming from so you have to know I see no difference between ANY "them" and "us" because we all ARE the same source. How and why we manifest differently is a function of how our individual bodies and brains deal with the fixed and unthinking animal drives that are part of manifesting our Spirit.
AS usual, you have no clue what I am doing. I am explaining the scientific foundation for the EXISTENCE of God. I assume you agree God exists so this has nothing to do with what you BELIEVE ABOUT God from the Bible. Those issues are separate and we disagree about them.
If you had spent that time in the Word of God rather than this mystic intellectualism, you would know that science will never be able to prove God's existence.
If you had spent that time in the Word of God rather than this mystic intellectualism, you would know that science will never be able to prove God's existence.
His existence is only revealed by Himself.
My effort is not to prove anything but to disprove the automatic atheism that is being pushed in this forum. I have said before, and I do again, I have no desire to interfere with your obviously sincere love of God no matter how wrong I think you are about why you believe and love God. I just think it is sad that you are motivated by ANY kind of fear of God or negative consequences from our Father.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
