Why Hasn't A Creationist Scientist Published The Scientific Proof That Creationism Is Real? (origin, pagan)

[Nea1]

Originally Posted by alphamale

Okay.

Who created the seeds of life?

Who needs seeds? The right conditions and elements, life happened. No creator needed.

[jeffington]

Originally Posted by PanTerra

Hey, can I play?

OK, here goes.

If we evolved from monkeys, why do we still have eyes?

I don't know how to deal with this question because it appears to be the work of an insane person, but in case you are seriously asking this question, the answer is because eyes are useful.

[TaoistDude]

Creationists may be closet atheists. They lack faith, so try to justify their absurd beliefs by trying to "prove" the unproveable. True faith doesn't need fake science.

Like pedophiles, creationists attempt to justify and rationalize their perversion by any means possible.

[jeffington]

Originally Posted by Driftwood2011

I guess the fallacy of absolutism in this statement escapes you?

Okay, prove him wrong. Come up with a single provable fact that points to the existance of a creator, i.e. "god".

I'll give you say,,,, 30 years to come up with one. Happy searching.

[jeffington]

Originally Posted by alphamale

Why hasn't an evolutionist provide proof that life didn't begin from a creator?

You're so confused. Evolution has to do with the development of different and varied lifeforms. It does NOT, however, speak to the source of life at its origins. That is a different law of nature, not the law of evolution.

[PanTerra]

Originally Posted by jeffington

I don't know how to deal with this question because it appears to be the work of an insane person, but in case you are seriously asking this question, the answer is because eyes are useful.

Exactly!!! The work of an insane person, to think that is a good argument. You couldn't see my tongue firmly planted in my cheek? i tried to make that obvious by saying, "Hey, can I play," just because it is so easy to follow up with bad arguments. It was just a twist on the old creationist stumper, "if we evolved from monkees, why are there still monkees" but even that get's too cliche'. Read Campbell's arguments. I was following his lead LOL. It's just too easy.

[lifertexan]

Originally Posted by jeffington

I don't know how to deal with this question because it appears to be the work of an insane person, but in case you are seriously asking this question, the answer is because eyes are useful.

It's a joke based on a post from Campbell,who claims that because most all creatures have eyes,this proves that identical mutations can spring up independently in various species.This is supposed to be a "logical" answer to the broken vitamin C gene that primates,including humans,share.

Kind of off track for Campbell and shows a bit of desperation,since that would mean that God created all animals without eyes and then they all developed them independently.But when the facts of life confound you and you go desperately searching for an answer to a question you don't truly even understand,such happens.

[PanTerra]

Originally Posted by lifertexan

It's a joke based on a post from Campbell,who claims that because most all creatures have eyes,this proves that identical mutations can spring up independently in various species.This is supposed to be a "logical" answer to the broken vitamin C gene that primates,including humans,share.

I guess if you have to explain it.... Thanks. Maybe I need to use the <sarcasm></sarcasm> around those kinds of posts, but it is always fun to see who bites.

[jeffington]

Originally Posted by PanTerra

Exactly!!! The work of an insane person, to think that is a good argument. You couldn't see my tongue firmly planted in my cheek? i tried to make that obvious by saying, "Hey, can I play," just because it is so easy to follow up with bad arguments. It was just a twist on the old creationist stumper, "if we evolved from monkees, why are there still monkees" but even that get's too cliche'. Read Campbell's arguments. I was following his lead LOL. It's just too easy.

Got it - I think? Did not know it was a joke.

[agnostic soldier]

Originally Posted by alphamale

Okay.

Who created the seeds of life?

You're making the presumption that something external entity created life although the better question would 'what caused life to begin.'