Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I hardly need point out your persistent shameless in changing the subject to one where you think you held your debating -position, but you only exhibited your persistent illogic and denial. You should stop wasting your rime, and ours.
Your shameless insistence that it is about whether or not God exists is an unethical and disingenuous tactic. The ACTUAL issue is whether or not what EXISTS is God which is a completely different issue negating your asinine logic games.
Your utter shamelessness involves your refusal to accept that NEITHER you nor I have the ability to PROVE anything about our views, that is why they are and must remain preferred BELIEFS about Reality and WHAT science is investigating..
Your shameless insistence that it is about whether or not God exists is an unethical and disingenuous tactic. The ACTUAL issue is whether or not what EXISTS is God which is a completely different issue negating your asinine logic games.
You wouldn't be going off topic again, would you? Surely you wouldn't.
Your shameless insistence that it is about whether or not God exists is an unethical and disingenuous tactic. The ACTUAL issue is whether or not what EXISTS is God which is a completely different issue negating your asinine logic games.
Your shameless insistence that it is about whether or not God exists is an unethical and disingenuous tactic. The ACTUAL issue is whether or not what EXISTS is God which is a completely different issue negating your asinine logic games.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mensaguy
Nope. Not about reality. It's about God.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mensaguy
You wouldn't be going off-topic again, would you? Surely you wouldn't.
BS. Just asking the question of does God EXIST assumes the consequent is that reality is what atheists assume making it fallacious. Just asking the question of does God NOT EXIST assumes the consequent is that reality is what theists assume making it fallacious. There is no method by which we get to presume EITHER consequent to the unanswerable question about the inscrutable reality, contrary to your ill-conceived rule. Though getting me to explain it is one way of inferring that I am violating the stupid rule.
BS. Just asking the question of does God EXIST assumes the consequent is that reality is what atheists assume making it fallacious. Just asking the question of does God NOT EXIST assumes the consequent is that reality is what theists assume making it fallacious. There is no method by which we get to presume EITHER consequent to the unanswerable question about the inscrutable reality, contrary to your ill-conceived rule. Though getting me to explain it is one way of inferring that I am violating the stupid rule.
Quit derailing threads with this nonsense. Just quit.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
