Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
From the artifacts that the French explorer who have visited the ark of Noah , and have brought back wood from the Boat high on the mountain and have pieces of the wood that they brought back, was on the same kind a oak trees ..... So Noah ark was made of Oak Wood which is of the same kind as this gopher wood with pitch added from Genesis 6: 14........ There is no record were Noah built the ark , but His ancestors were settled in the land were Iraq is , as the Euphrates River, Land of Havilah , and the Gihon River , and Ethiopia
From the artifacts that the French explorer who have visited the ark of Noah , and have brought back wood from the Boat high on the mountain and have pieces of the wood that they brought back, was on the same kind a oak trees ..... So Noah ark was made of Oak Wood which is of the same kind as this gopher wood with pitch added from Genesis 6: 14........ There is no record were Noah built the ark , but His ancestors were settled in the land were Iraq is , as the Euphrates River, Land of Havilah , and the Gihon River , and Ethiopia
What? Artifacts of the ark? Every so called discovery of the ark has been a hoax, but I guess one of them fooled you, huh?
Can't you think? If the highest mountains on the earth in Noah's day were 300 feet high and the water was fifteen cubits above the mountains then the water would be at a height of 322 feet and so the mountains would be covered with 22 feet of water.
So when the reality is the polar opposites with a fairy tale, there is always another fairy tale to compensate. The never ending cornucopia of utter nonsense and willful ignorance supporting more pure nonsense.
So a mere 5000 years ago, the tallest mountain was only 300 feet high? Then we can also assume that the deepest part of the ocean would also be only 300 feet, which would mean that there would be no dry land anywhere, this would be water world.
The desperation exhibited to validate your fantasy view of an ancient fable creates the illusion that you have some serious inability to deal with what is real and what is a complete fantasy.
Stay tuned to see what absurd explanation is next, the never ending story of complete unfathomable absurdities.
Being a righteous man, he paid the workers as he went along. Maybe he paid them with food or money or both.
So god was funding this? Given the technology of the times, that would have been a huge labor force. How did he deliver the funds? Is there where the fantasy of Leprechauns and pots of gold at the end of a rainbow come in to the fantasy?
Or perhaps "money trees" were real, but none survived the flood?
Am I close? Be gentle in your criticism of my solutions, I lack the vast experience in fabricating facts to explain things away you seem to have.
Being a righteous man, he paid the workers as he went along. Maybe he paid them with food or money or both.
Knowing that they, their wives and kids, animals, homes, money and food would all be drowned as soon as the job was done. It stinks, sunshine.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
