U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Closed Thread
 
Unread 09-27-2009, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Midwest
136 posts, read 158,632 times
Reputation: 14
Default Little or no change

Here is yet another example of what I said earlier: statements by evolutionists admitting little or no evolutionary change when the comparisons with living offspring are made

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h106/Martyrs5/Sep27271.jpg (broken link)

Here is another:

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h106/Martyrs5/Sep27270.jpg (broken link)

One would think that some of them would catch on sooner or later that biological evolution has never occurred. Some have but the poison of Darwinism has deeply infected the scientific world as evidenced by the stern opposition they have to anyone who exposes their beliefs for what they are; wishful thinking at best.

 
Unread 09-27-2009, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Midwest
136 posts, read 158,632 times
Reputation: 14
Default kicking and screaming?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
The final major class of animal to evolve flight was the bat that first appeared about 55 million years. Little fossil evidence of bat evolution has been found, and the earliest known bat fossil Icaronycteris was already a fully evolved flying animal. Early bats did have long tails and several teeth that no longer appear in modern species, but bats have otherwise changed very little since that time.
I normally don't respond to sanspeur but this one caught my eye.

1. The bat didn't 'evolve' flight. It was created that way. That is the whole point of what I posted (3 times!) concerning the bat. This fossil has no predecssor nor ancestor in the fossil record. It appeared abruptly in the fossil record AS IS.

2. His second statement merely describes the variation within the kind of organism which we believe in. No problem.

Evolution does not exist and never did and sanspeur and company may come kicking and screaming into that reality eventually but sooner or later the scientific world is going to have to bite the bullet and admit the fraud.
 
Unread 09-27-2009, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Midwest
136 posts, read 158,632 times
Reputation: 14
Default Poor me

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kele View Post
Bwaaa haaa haaa haaa haaa....

Talk about deliberately missing the point...you're pretty hilarious there, ostrich boy.
Oh, how convincing! I'm so impressed!

If I had only seen this before I would have been TOTALLY CONVINCED that God does not exist and evolution is the truth!

Poor me.
 
Unread 09-27-2009, 02:02 PM
 
Location: Midwest
136 posts, read 158,632 times
Reputation: 14
Default Baloney

Quote:
Originally Posted by MontanaGuy View Post
Calypsis4 wrote:

What is the point of posting more photographs with examples of organisms that haven't changed much in millions of years? Two or three would have been plenty. As I mentioned earlier you won't find the same thing with modern land mammals because they've evolved recently in terms of geologic time spans. Can you present us with with a fossil of a dairy cow that's been dated from the age of the dinosaurs?
Do you think it possible to switch your brain back to 'on' mode so you can grasp the fact that an intellectual atomic bomb has been dropped on your theory? Are you really so far from reality that you can't grab hold of the fact that there are hundreds of such examples and there are more being found all the time AND that this fact reveals very clearly that biological evolution has never occurred in our world?

Like sanspeur and company, you may come kicking and screaming into that reality but sooner or later you will have to bite the bullet and admit it.
 
Unread 09-27-2009, 02:04 PM
 
Location: Valencia, Spain
7,886 posts, read 3,286,971 times
Reputation: 1481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calypsis4 View Post
Oh, how convincing! I'm so impressed!
Either the planet is 6,000 years old which means that the fossils you are presenting are less than 6,000 old and therefore to young to exhibit any evolutionary changes, which destroys your argument or....

.....the fossils are 50,000,000 years old and your claim of a 6,000 year old planet is debunked.

Which is it to be?
 
Unread 09-27-2009, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Midwest
136 posts, read 158,632 times
Reputation: 14
Default Even more

Here is even more evidence against biological evolution:

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h106/Martyrs5/Sep27269.jpg (broken link)

And here is another:

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h106/Martyrs5/Sep27268.jpg (broken link)
 
Unread 09-27-2009, 02:07 PM
 
Location: Midwest
136 posts, read 158,632 times
Reputation: 14
Default And there is more

The next specimens revealing no evolutionary change:

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h106/Martyrs5/Sep27267.jpg (broken link)

And then this one:

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h106/Martyrs5/Sep27265.jpg (broken link)
 
Unread 09-27-2009, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Valencia, Spain
7,886 posts, read 3,286,971 times
Reputation: 1481
Respond to post 273.
 
Unread 09-27-2009, 02:11 PM
 
Location: Midwest
136 posts, read 158,632 times
Reputation: 14
Default The latter

Quote:
Originally Posted by justme58 View Post
Someone let me know when he actually starts dialogue and posting his own thoughts, for now he is in the ignore bin as his pics just waste bandwidth.
Hmm, you must have just stepped into this. You haven't seen my written positions in relation to this subject...or else you are simply not telling the truth.

I think the latter.
 
Unread 09-27-2009, 02:15 PM
 
Location: San Diego North County
4,804 posts, read 4,412,348 times
Reputation: 2921
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calypsis4 View Post
Oh, how convincing! I'm so impressed!

If I had only seen this before I would have been TOTALLY CONVINCED that God does not exist and evolution is the truth!

Poor me.
Oh OUCH!

I am slain to my foundations by your witty repartee.

That's it. I can no longer fight against such an intellectual giant.

Now that you've beaten me down, let's see you respond to some of the pertinent and intelligent questions that have been posed to you numerous times and ignored as you ran all over cyber space in search of pictures to back your unconvincing argument.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:37 PM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top